> On Sept. 23, 2016, 3:16 a.m., Boudhayan Gupta wrote:
> > Diff looks sane to me, and the feature seems useful in theory.
> >
> > Will this require a reindexing? Seems to me from previous comments made by
> > vHanda that there's a schema change involved?
>
> James Smith wrote:
> Yes. The f
> On Feb. 4, 2017, 11:59 a.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > Any reason this has not been commited?
>
> Luigi Toscano wrote:
> Because there was no final decision.
>
> It is true that the Baloo database can be regenerated, but I would say
> that if we avoid a complete rebuild of the
> On Feb. 4, 2017, 7:59 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > Any reason this has not been commited?
>
> Luigi Toscano wrote:
> Because there was no final decision.
>
> It is true that the Baloo database can be regenerated, but I would say
> that if we avoid a complete rebuild of the
> On Feb. 4, 2017, 11:59 a.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > Any reason this has not been commited?
>
> Luigi Toscano wrote:
> Because there was no final decision.
>
> It is true that the Baloo database can be regenerated, but I would say
> that if we avoid a complete rebuild of the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129839/#review102387
---
No need to move this (yet).
src/extractors/taglibextractor
> On Feb. 4, 2017, 7:59 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > Any reason this has not been commited?
Because there was no final decision.
It is true that the Baloo database can be regenerated, but I would say that if
we avoid a complete rebuild of the database after a Frameworks update, that
wou
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129605/#review102382
---
Any reason this has not been commited?
- Albert Astals Cid
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127728/
---
(Updated Feb. 4, 2017, 11:09 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been di
