Re: Dropping kdelibs4-based applications in KDE Applications 17.12

2016-11-12 Thread Marko Käning
Hi Luigi, On 12 Nov 2016, at 11:49 , Luigi Toscano wrote: > Almost every ported application has no more supported kdelibs4 branch right > now. i know. > It would be better to focus and complete the porting. Yeah, it would be, but you perhaps remember since when I am already busying myself

Re: Dropping kdelibs4-based applications in KDE Applications 17.12

2016-11-12 Thread Marko Käning
On 12 Nov 2016, at 11:59 , Elvis Angelaccio wrote: > Ah, then yes I don't see why it shouldn't be possible anymore Thanks for the heads-up.

Re: Dropping kdelibs4-based applications in KDE Applications 17.12

2016-11-12 Thread Marko Käning
Hi Elvis, On 12 Nov 2016, at 11:44 , Elvis Angelaccio wrote: > What do you mean with "KDE4 repositories"? The kdelibs repo? > Otherwise each app's repository will keep its KDE4-based branches and > you can continue to build them. I meant each lib’s and app’s repository’s KDE branches. The ques

Re: Dropping kdelibs4-based applications in KDE Applications 17.12

2016-11-12 Thread Luigi Toscano
Il 12 novembre 2016 11:36:41 CET, "Marko Käning" ha scritto: > >On 12 Nov 2016, at 11:29 , René J.V. Bertin >wrote: > >> I don't see why people currently maintaining KDE4-based applications >(by choice or necessity) could no longer continue to do so. The fact >they're not included in an official

Re: Dropping kdelibs4-based applications in KDE Applications 17.12

2016-11-12 Thread Luigi Toscano
Il 12 novembre 2016 11:24:51 CET, "Marko Käning" ha scritto: >Hi Albert, > >On 10 Nov 2016, at 23:42 , Albert Astals Cid wrote: > >> Hi, my proposal would be to make KDE Applications 17.08 the last >release we >> accept applications based on kdelibs4, that means people have a year >until KDE >

Re: Dropping kdelibs4-based applications in KDE Applications 17.12

2016-11-12 Thread Elvis Angelaccio
On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 11:36 AM, Marko Käning wrote: > > On 12 Nov 2016, at 11:29 , René J.V. Bertin wrote: > >> I don't see why people currently maintaining KDE4-based applications (by >> choice or necessity) could no longer continue to do so. The fact they're not >> included in an official b

Re: Dropping kdelibs4-based applications in KDE Applications 17.12

2016-11-12 Thread Marko Käning
On 12 Nov 2016, at 11:29 , René J.V. Bertin wrote: > I don't see why people currently maintaining KDE4-based applications (by > choice or necessity) could no longer continue to do so. The fact they're not > included in an official bundle doesn't mean they have to disappear from > bugs.kde.org

Re: Dropping kdelibs4-based applications in KDE Applications 17.12

2016-11-12 Thread René J . V . Bertin
On Saturday November 12 2016 11:24:51 Marko Käning wrote: > do you also mean by this that from then on it wouldn’t be possible anymore to > bugfix existing KDE4 libs and apps, or am I misreading this? I don't see why people currently maintaining KDE4-based applications (by choice or necessity)

Re: Dropping kdelibs4-based applications in KDE Applications 17.12

2016-11-12 Thread Marko Käning
Hi Albert, On 10 Nov 2016, at 23:42 , Albert Astals Cid wrote: > Hi, my proposal would be to make KDE Applications 17.08 the last release we > accept applications based on kdelibs4, that means people have a year until > KDE > Applications 17.12 to port the applications from the list below to

Re: Dropping kdelibs4-based applications in KDE Applications 17.12

2016-11-12 Thread Luigi Toscano
Il 12 novembre 2016 04:18:58 CET, "David C. Rankin" ha scritto: >On 11/11/2016 11:32 AM, Luigi Toscano wrote: >>> Will we still release the KDE4 platform for not-yet-ported extragear >>> > applications (Amarok etc.) with 17.12? >>> > >>> > If we stop releasing it, then we should also move all un