Re: Re[2]: mark kget obsolete?

2016-04-26 Thread Antonio Rojas
Nick Shaforostoff wrote: > ok, does anybody mind if i disable bittorrent support in KGet sources > for Applications/16.04 and master (still qt4-based) branches? > What's the need to disable it in the source? It's already optional at build time and, even if built, it's an optional plugin at runt

Re: Re[2]: mark kget obsolete?

2016-04-26 Thread Alexander Potashev
2016-04-27 3:22 GMT+03:00 Nick Shaforostoff : > ok, does anybody mind if i disable bittorrent support in KGet sources > for Applications/16.04 and master (still qt4-based) branches? Please don't disable this feature. It was around for several years already, so someone may need it. -- Alexander P

Re[2]: mark kget obsolete?

2016-04-26 Thread Nick Shaforostoff
ok, does anybody mind if i disable bittorrent support in KGet sources for Applications/16.04 and master (still qt4-based) branches? > > FWIW, the library not being co-installable is kind of a bug, or at > > least bad form anyway. > > That is true, of course. > The two things are probably orthogon