Re: Apple OS X Patches for KDE Software (was MacPorts Patches).

Hi Boudhayan, On 01/12/2015, at 1:05 AM, Boudhayan Gupta wrote: > We've suddenly been having an influx of MacPorts specific patches, It is best not to use that word ("influx") - it has racist and xenophobic connotations, which I am sure you do not intend. Besides, the patches are not "MacPorts s

Re: FOSDEM Desktops DevRoom 2016: Call for Participation

Hello, Just a quick mail to remind everybody we will accept talk proposals for the Desktops DevRoom at FOSDEM 2016 only until this Saturday. Hurry up! On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 8:44 PM, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote: > > FOSDEM Desktops DevRoom 2016 Call for Participation > > FOSDEM is one of the larg

Re: MacPorts Patches

On Monday 30 November 2015 17:23:45 Thomas Lübking wrote: > On Montag, 30. November 2015 17:03:01 CEST, Martin Graesslin wrote: > > There have been various OSX patches being created against the > > kde-workspace > > repository in the past. So yeah, it seems to be part of what they want to > > achie

Re: MacPorts Patches

On Montag, 30. November 2015 17:03:01 CEST, Martin Graesslin wrote: There have been various OSX patches being created against the kde-workspace repository in the past. So yeah, it seems to be part of what they want to achieve. I doubt it makes sense to run plasma-desktop/kwin/plasmashell on O

Re: MacPorts Patches

On Monday, November 30, 2015 8:50:48 AM CET Jeremy Whiting wrote: > Boudhayan, > > I'm not sure why you think the MacPorts approach has anything to do > with running a full KDE experience. Macports is just a packaging > system, and in KDE's aspect of MacPorts it's only to get our > applications an

Re: MacPorts Patches

Boudhayan, I'm not sure why you think the MacPorts approach has anything to do with running a full KDE experience. Macports is just a packaging system, and in KDE's aspect of MacPorts it's only to get our applications and libraries, there's no intent that I've seen anywhere with MacPorts (or Windo

MacPorts Patches

Hi all, We've suddenly been having an influx of MacPorts specific patches, and most of them have ended up generating some sort of controversy because what I perceive to be some differences in envisioned use-cases. Unless I'm much mistaken, the "full KDE experience", if I may call it that, is inte

QxOrm 1.4.1 released : new documentation (user guide), and boost::serialization becomes optional

Hello, *QxOrm 1.4.1 just released !* Changes in version QxOrm 1.4.1 : *!!! IMPORTANT NOTE ABOUT THIS VERSION !!!* : it is strongly recommended to read the QxOrm.pri configuration file of this new version (compilation

Close Bug 340240

Hi, Can someone close Bug 340240 (https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=340240) with an appropriate status? The comment thread on the page is conclusive. It's filed against KHotkeys. -- Boudhayan. >> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<