On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 3:40 AM, Be wrote:
>
>
> On 07/30/2015 07:08 AM, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
>
> So instead of 3, 4, 5 or more KDE/Qt based music players I´d rather see
>> one or
>> two. I´d envision something like the Plasma devs did for Plasma. Make one
>> extensible core and give it sever
On 07/30/2015 07:08 AM, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
So instead of 3, 4, 5 or more KDE/Qt based music players I´d rather see one or
two. I´d envision something like the Plasma devs did for Plasma. Make one
extensible core and give it several faces. Make one player core that for a
change is absolu
Hi,
On 2015-07-31 23:43, kainz.a wrote:
> what's the problem with using Amarok? In kde4 times they are the first
> application that use plasma. now I think an qt 5 port is still open so this
> would be the perfect time to get into an redesign isn't it? If the amarok
> developers don't like an rede
what's the problem with using Amarok? In kde4 times they are the first
application that use plasma. now I think an qt 5 port is still open so this
would be the perfect time to get into an redesign isn't it? If the amarok
developers don't like an redesign (what I can understand, because the last
red
On Thursday, July 30, 2015 17:56:42 Martin Sandsmark wrote:
> I also sold my soul and started using Spotify a lot, so that meant I
> downprioritized JuK a bit.
Same here, I feel ashamed for not using Free software to listen to my music,
but then .. music on harddisks is simply deprecated for me.
On Friday, July 31, 2015 07:32:05 PM Boudhayan Gupta wrote:
> On 31 July 2015 at 06:53, Michael Pyne wrote:
> > It's basically still a KDE 3 app that got only partially ported to KDE
> > 4...
> >
> > IMHO some kind of rewrite using taglib and Phonon and a very simple GUI
> > would be the best way
Hi,
On 2015-07-31 20:29, Wolfgang Mader wrote:
> Would it be a good idea to also take plasma mobile into account on deciding
> the code base?
from my PoV definitly. If we could have a Backend that using different
UIs and maybe some different code can run on Desktop, Mobile & Big
Screen (Plasma M
Would it be a good idea to also take plasma mobile into account on deciding the
code base?
On July 30, 2015 3:06:46 PM GMT+02:00, Stefan Derkits wrote:
>Hi,
>
>On 2015-07-30 14:08, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
>> Why a new one? Aren´t none of the existing ones in a state that they
>can´t be
>> evo
Hello,
taking some lists off this discussion.
Let us try to use the kde-multimedia list, there is no mail traffic
there anyways ;)
On 2015-07-31 16:35, kainz.a wrote:
> why we can't use PMC as standard audio and video player? I think there was
> also an discussion about an standard video player
why we can't use PMC as standard audio and video player? I think there was
also an discussion about an standard video player so PMC is in our source
and we don't have to start developing again.
cheers
Andreas
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
On 31 July 2015 at 06:53, Michael Pyne wrote:
> It's basically still a KDE 3 app that got only partially ported to KDE 4...
>
> IMHO some kind of rewrite using taglib and Phonon and a very simple GUI would
> be the best way to go for KDE 5. Martin Sandsmark was working on a better port
> but it's
11 matches
Mail list logo
