Re: QtQuick: Why is it relevant

Hi, Adding to what Aleix said, the approach to problems being different might also lead to confusion and frustration in the beginning if you have used QWidgets extensively. In such cases, reading the examples (there are loads of them) is very useful. -- Shantanu Tushar(UTC +0530) http://www.

Re: QtQuick: Why is it relevant

On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 1:13 AM, Olivier CHURLAUD wrote: > Hi, > > I saw that one of the great feature of Qt was QtQuick, and that KDE chose to > use this a lot. I went lately from fully written widgets to QtDesigner > > What are the real advantages of QtQuick over the old fashion Qt (I don't >

QtQuick: Why is it relevant

Hi, I saw that one of the great feature of Qt was QtQuick, and that KDE chose to use this a lot. I went lately from fully written widgets to QtDesigner What are the real advantages of QtQuick over the old fashion Qt (I don't know how to call it)? Are there drawbacks? (The real question i

Pathes were not reviewed

Hello, friends. Some time ago I have sent patches (here and here ), but I have not received any response yet. I'm new to opensource community so I have no suggestion why my pathes were ignored. Should I fix s

Re: Pathes were not reviewed

Hello Alexander, I think there are only 2 reasons it has been ignored. 1. We mostly send patches and review patches via review board ( git.reviewboard.kde.org) these days, rather in bugzilla directly. 2. I don't think Brad Hards has been too active lately. If you can stick those patches on review

Re: Pathes were not reviewed

On Thursday 05 of March 2015 16:42:35 Александр Михалевич wrote: > Hello, friends. > Some time ago I have sent patches (here > and here > ), but I have not received any > response yet. I'm new to opensource c

Re: Google Summer of Code 2015

On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 6:08 PM, Arun Jayan wrote: > Hello friends , > >I am Arun Jayan from College of engineering poojar , kerala , India . > I am a 3rd year Computer Science and engineering student . I am interested > in working for foss . > So I started with microhope . > > Microhope is