> On Oct. 19, 2014, 3:33 p.m., Emmanuel Pescosta wrote:
> > What are the possible benefits of this patch?
> >
> > You still have a lot of code duplication in both plugins, an additional
> > dependency on Qt xml in KFileMetaData itself and (possible) slowdowns in
> > both plugins (esp. in odf e
> On Okt. 19, 2014, 1:33 nachm., Emmanuel Pescosta wrote:
> > What are the possible benefits of this patch?
> >
> > You still have a lot of code duplication in both plugins, an additional
> > dependency on Qt xml in KFileMetaData itself and (possible) slowdowns in
> > both plugins (esp. in odf
> On Oct. 19, 2014, 1:33 p.m., Emmanuel Pescosta wrote:
> > What are the possible benefits of this patch?
> >
> > You still have a lot of code duplication in both plugins, an additional
> > dependency on Qt xml in KFileMetaData itself and (possible) slowdowns in
> > both plugins (esp. in odf e
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120657/#review68706
---
What are the possible benefits of this patch?
You still have
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120657/
---
Review request for Baloo and Vishesh Handa.
Repository: kfilemetadata
D
