Re: Disabling baloo-integration possible?

2014-04-09 Thread Ian Wadham
On 10/04/2014, at 8:40 AM, Thomas Lübking wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 10. April 2014 schrieb : > > > So, I wonder what baloo would be doing on OSX to get its hands into the > > user’s emails… > > I hope Vishesh can clarify this! > > > > Sure one doesn’t want to see any collisions between OSX

Re: Disabling baloo-integration possible?

2014-04-09 Thread Bradley Giesbrecht
On Apr 9, 2014, at 3:47 PM, mk-li...@email.de wrote: > On 10 Apr 2014, at 00:40 , Thomas Lübking wrote: >> i assume, ideally the api would just abstract spotlight on osx? >> would require someone developing an osx backend. > > Yes, Thomas, that would be ideal. > > Since I am not an OSX developer

Re: Disabling baloo-integration possible?

2014-04-09 Thread mk-lists
On 10 Apr 2014, at 00:40 , Thomas Lübking wrote: > i assume, ideally the api would just abstract spotlight on osx? > would require someone developing an osx backend. Yes, Thomas, that would be ideal. Since I am not an OSX developer I have no clue as to how open Apple’s API’s regarding Spotlight

Re: Disabling baloo-integration possible?

2014-04-09 Thread Lindsay Mathieson
On Thu, 10 Apr 2014 12:18:56 AM Albert Astals Cid wrote: > but if you > use KMail it(akonadi_baloo_indexer) will still index your emails into the > Baloo database, and may be other baloo_stuff (not aware of others existing) > running. Contacts and calendar as well. If the akonadi_baloo resour

Re: Disabling baloo-integration possible?

2014-04-09 Thread Thomas Lübking
Am Donnerstag, 10. April 2014 schrieb : > So, I wonder what baloo would be doing on OSX to get its hands into the user’s emails… > I hope Vishesh can clarify this! > > Sure one doesn’t want to see any collisions between OSX’ Spotlight indexer on one side and baloo on the other. i assume,

Re: Disabling baloo-integration possible?

2014-04-09 Thread mk-lists
On 10 Apr 2014, at 00:18 , Albert Astals Cid wrote: > Again not Baloo guy here, but as far as I know you can't disable "Baloo", > what > Vishesh told you is how to disable it's file indexer (baloofile), but if you > use KMail it(akonadi_baloo_indexer) will still index your emails into the > Ba

Re: Disabling baloo-integration possible?

2014-04-09 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dijous, 10 d'abril de 2014, a les 00:12:55, mk-li...@email.de va escriure: > Hi again, > > On 09 Apr 2014, at 23:53 , Frank Reininghaus wrote: > > I think that there are many KDE apps which do not require Baloo at all. > > I could imagine that too. > > > I'm not sure if there is a full list

Re: Disabling baloo-integration possible?

2014-04-09 Thread mk-lists
Hi again, On 09 Apr 2014, at 23:53 , Frank Reininghaus wrote: > I think that there are many KDE apps which do not require Baloo at all. I could imagine that too. > I'm not sure if there is a full list somewhere, but you can > always build KDE modules and watch for any Baloo-related output from >

Re: Disabling baloo-integration possible?

2014-04-09 Thread mk-lists
Hi Albert, On 09 Apr 2014, at 22:28 , Albert Astals Cid wrote: > No, it is not, if we had to do user support in this list it would get crowded I got it. > So you are a packager, ok, the it's not user support and I guess it is kind > on > topic. If you had given all the information on the begi

Re: Disabling baloo-integration possible?

2014-04-09 Thread Frank Reininghaus
Hi, 2014-04-09 23:37 GMT+02:00: > Hi Frank, > > thanks again for your constructive feedback! :) > > On 09 Apr 2014, at 22:24 , Frank Reininghaus wrote: >> yes, but you might not be able to build and/or use all KDE >> applications correctly. kdelibs itself does not depend on Baloo at >> all. > oka

Re: Disabling baloo-integration possible?

2014-04-09 Thread mk-lists
Hi Frank, thanks again for your constructive feedback! :) On 09 Apr 2014, at 22:24 , Frank Reininghaus wrote: > yes, but you might not be able to build and/or use all KDE > applications correctly. kdelibs itself does not depend on Baloo at > all. okay, good to know that kdelibs itself doesn’t ne

Re: Disabling baloo-integration possible?

2014-04-09 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dimecres, 9 d'abril de 2014, a les 22:11:49, mk-li...@email.de va escriure: > Hi Albert, > > On 09 Apr 2014, at 22:01 , Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > How is this a development question? Remember this is kde-devel, not a > > support forum. > > it is not? No, it is not, if we had to do user sup

Re: Disabling baloo-integration possible?

2014-04-09 Thread Frank Reininghaus
Hi, 2014-04-09 21:29 GMT+02:00: > Hi Vishesh, > > On 08 Apr 2014, at 10:36 , Vishesh Handa wrote: >>> will it be possible to run KDE without baloo enabled? >> Yes. You can go to System Settings -> Desktop Search -> Exclude Folders, and >> add your $HOME directory over there. >> >> Otherwise you ca

Re: Disabling baloo-integration possible?

2014-04-09 Thread mk-lists
Hi Albert, On 09 Apr 2014, at 22:01 , Albert Astals Cid wrote: > How is this a development question? Remember this is kde-devel, not a support > forum. it is not? > If you want to check if that is possible. Try it out yourself. I am not a KDE developer, just a port maintainer, and I thought I A

Re: Disabling baloo-integration possible?

2014-04-09 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dimecres, 9 d'abril de 2014, a les 21:29:43, mk-li...@email.de va escriure: > Hi Vishesh, > > On 08 Apr 2014, at 10:36 , Vishesh Handa wrote: > >> will it be possible to run KDE without baloo enabled? > > > > Yes. You can go to System Settings -> Desktop Search -> Exclude Folders, > > and add

Re: Disabling baloo-integration possible?

2014-04-09 Thread mk-lists
Hi Vishesh, On 08 Apr 2014, at 10:36 , Vishesh Handa wrote: >> will it be possible to run KDE without baloo enabled? > Yes. You can go to System Settings -> Desktop Search -> Exclude Folders, and > add your $HOME directory over there. > > Otherwise you can also edit the baloofilerc file and add

Re: Review Request 117441: Raise match ceiling in the KRunner plugin from 5 to 10

2014-04-09 Thread Eike Hein
> On April 9, 2014, 1:46 p.m., Vishesh Handa wrote: > > Pushed as 8df8be6ac. - Eike --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117441/#review55289 --

Re: Review Request 117441: Raise match ceiling in the KRunner plugin from 5 to 10

2014-04-09 Thread Eike Hein
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117441/ --- (Updated April 9, 2014, 1:55 p.m.) Status -- This change has been ma

Re: Review Request 117441: Raise match ceiling in the KRunner plugin from 5 to 10

2014-04-09 Thread Vishesh Handa
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117441/#review55288 --- Ship it! - Vishesh Handa On April 9, 2014, 1:42 p.m., Eike

Re: Review Request 117441: Raise match ceiling in the KRunner plugin from 5 to 10

2014-04-09 Thread Vishesh Handa
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117441/#review55289 --- Ship it! - Vishesh Handa On April 9, 2014, 1:42 p.m., Eike

Re: Review Request 117441: Raise match ceiling in the KRunner plugin from 5 to 10

2014-04-09 Thread Eike Hein
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117441/ --- (Updated April 9, 2014, 1:42 p.m.) Review request for Baloo and Vishesh H

Re: Review Request 117441: Raise match ceiling in the KRunner plugin from 5 to 10

2014-04-09 Thread Vishesh Handa
> On April 9, 2014, 8:46 a.m., Vishesh Handa wrote: > > I'm a little hesitant about this because the user may never see emails as > > KMail only shows the first 8 results or so. The user can scroll but by > > default they will never see the Emails. > > > > Do you think it would make sense inte

Re: Review Request 117441: Raise match ceiling in the KRunner plugin from 5 to 10

2014-04-09 Thread Eike Hein
> On April 9, 2014, 8:46 a.m., Vishesh Handa wrote: > > I'm a little hesitant about this because the user may never see emails as > > KMail only shows the first 8 results or so. The user can scroll but by > > default they will never see the Emails. > > > > Do you think it would make sense inte

Re: Review Request 117441: Raise match ceiling in the KRunner plugin from 5 to 10

2014-04-09 Thread Eike Hein
> On April 9, 2014, 8:46 a.m., Vishesh Handa wrote: > > I'm a little hesitant about this because the user may never see emails as > > KMail only shows the first 8 results or so. The user can scroll but by > > default they will never see the Emails. > > > > Do you think it would make sense inte

Re: Review Request 117441: Raise match ceiling in the KRunner plugin from 5 to 10

2014-04-09 Thread Vishesh Handa
> On April 9, 2014, 8:46 a.m., Vishesh Handa wrote: > > I'm a little hesitant about this because the user may never see emails as > > KMail only shows the first 8 results or so. The user can scroll but by > > default they will never see the Emails. > > > > Do you think it would make sense inte

Re: Review Request 117441: Raise match ceiling in the KRunner plugin from 5 to 10

2014-04-09 Thread Vishesh Handa
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117441/#review55262 --- I'm a little hesitant about this because the user may never se