Re: Request for review

Hi Kevin, thank you very much for your comments. I revised the code regarding your comments and checked in some minutes ago. Best regards, Conny Am 16.02.2014 14:45, schrieb Kevin Krammer: Hi, On Saturday, 2014-02-15, 19:44:46, Conny Marco Menebröcker wrote: Hello all, I have written my

Re: Question about Qt tests

Em dom 16 fev 2014, às 06:38:35, Michael Stemle escreveu: > So, I'm still getting used to the dpointer paradigm. Is anybody familiar > with how to use QTest to simulate code paths dependent on values in the > dpointer which have no exposed mutators? If they have no exposed mutators, can those valu

Re: Request for review

Hi, On Saturday, 2014-02-15, 19:44:46, Conny Marco Menebröcker wrote: > Hello all, > > > I have written my first plasmoid. I called it PlasmaTaskViewer, because > it views the todos of a calendar file. > In my case it shows the entries of my iPhone reminder app. > > I would be happy if someone

Re: Question about Qt tests

On Sunday, 2014-02-16, 06:38:35, Michael Stemle wrote: > So, I'm still getting used to the dpointer paradigm. Is anybody familiar > with how to use QTest to simulate code paths dependent on values in the > dpointer which have no exposed mutators? > > For instance, I have QApt::Transaction which ha

Question about Qt tests

So, I'm still getting used to the dpointer paradigm. Is anybody familiar with how to use QTest to simulate code paths dependent on values in the dpointer which have no exposed mutators? For instance, I have QApt::Transaction which has its dpointer, and its dpointer has a property "error". This pro