On Tuesday, May 29, 2012 09:03:11 Andrew Mason wrote:
> > There may be an answer to the question of how to programmatically render
> > icons that are both attractive and useful across a wide range of sizes,
> > but
> > SVG isn't it.
>
> Out of curiosity what are the issues with regards to SVG?
Fo
On Tuesday, May 29, 2012 09:03:11 Andrew Mason wrote:
> > There may be an answer to the question of how to programmatically render
> > icons that are both attractive and useful across a wide range of sizes,
> > but
> > SVG isn't it.
>
> Out of curiosity what are the issues with regards to SVG?
He
>
> There may be an answer to the question of how to programmatically render
> icons that are both attractive and useful across a wide range of sizes, but
> SVG isn't it.
Out of curiosity what are the issues with regards to SVG?
Kind regards
Andrew
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/
On Mon, 28 May 2012 06:56:20 PM Michael Pyne wrote:
> Of course, it may certainly be the case for a given app that no special
> icons are needed and that the PNG icons are simply dumped directly from
> SVG. It should be fine to get rid of PNG icons in that case
Pretty much the case for me, I'll
On Tuesday, May 29, 2012 08:31:01 Lindsay Mathieson wrote:
> Do we still need PNG application icons? I have a app with the usual:
> hi-app-.png for 49,32 & 16 pixel sizes, all generated from
> a SVG icon.
>
> Can we just do away with the png icons now and use just one SVG icon?
The short answer
