> I just read a very good novel where all such talk about "Software
Collection"
> or "Platform" was aptly called "commercial bulshytt". I think many of us,
> including your "only-users", would appreciate it if you all there upstream
> would just stick to KDE, because that is what everyone uses.
On Friday 10 June 2011, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> Kevin Kofler wrote:
> >OK, since a lot of context apparently got lost during the message
> >passing, let
> >me just state my (personal) position clearly:
> >
> >What I think is acceptable:
> >* Module X wants feature Y, which is non-invasive and wel
On Thursday 09 June 2011, Eric Hameleers wrote:
> Andreas, how I agree!
>
> This now, is _exactly_ what I was afraid for when I voiced my concern
> about the break-up of this relatively small collection of coherent
> source tarballs we are used to work with, into a fragmented and
> potentially dis
OK, since a lot of context apparently got lost during the message passing, let
me just state my (personal) position clearly:
What I think is acceptable:
* Module X wants feature Y, which is non-invasive and well-tested and does not
change the user experience nor the user interface in a significa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 9 Jun 2011, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> Dear KDE upstream,
>
>> Since KDE is the community, how can we do a KDE 4.8? And then Platform will
>> call itself 5 if I understood correctly. So how do we call a new release
>> schedule then?
>
> I jus
Dear KDE upstream,
> Since KDE is the community, how can we do a KDE 4.8? And then Platform will
> call itself 5 if I understood correctly. So how do we call a new release
> schedule then?
I just read a very good novel where all such talk about "Software Collection"
or "Platform" was aptly call
Hello,
On penktadienis 10 Birželis 2011 00:09:16 Eric Hameleers wrote:
> > That both makes no sense. Suggestion 1 fails completely with the "if they
> > like" part, since we all know already how much pain the "out of sync
> > kdepim" caused. Suggestion 2 fails with the "independent of the
> > sche
On Friday 10 June 2011 01:22:00 Kevin Kofler wrote:
> On Friday 10 June 2011, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > >OK, since a lot of context apparently got lost during the message
> > >passing, let
> > >me just state my (personal) position clearly:
> > >
> > >What I think is accept
Kevin Kofler wrote:
>OK, since a lot of context apparently got lost during the message
>passing, let
>me just state my (personal) position clearly:
>
>What I think is acceptable:
>* Module X wants feature Y, which is non-invasive and well-tested and
>does not
>change the user experience nor t
- Original Message -
> My main concern with disparate releases would be that it would be
> impossible
> to test all the possible combinations properly. Every distribution
> would end
> up with its own combination of versions, with the potential for
> incompatibilities nobody else can reprod
Hi,
The release-team mailinglist is for release coordination, reaching consensus
and then announce the outcome on the appropiate lists. I think I started a
valid discussion, which can be discussed maturely inside the release-team, it
was not meant to be passed to a wider audience.
You have no
Hello Michael!
On Thursday, June 09, 2011 02:32:09 AM Michael Pyne wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 08, 2011 20:20:44 Gregory Schlomoff wrote:
> > Try wrapping them in double quotes, like this:
> >
> > cmake-options -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_DEBUG="-g3 -O0"
>
> It's been awhile since I had to add this, but t
On Thursday 09 Jun 2011 15:31:42 John Layt wrote:
> We would like to co-ordinate our efforts at QtCS to ensure the best
> possible outcome for KDE and Qt. To help this we would like all KDE
> community members attending to list their name on the KDE at QtCS wiki
> page [2]. Please indicate if you
The Qt Contributors Summit [1] is happening Berlin from 16-18 June to discuss
the future of Qt under Open Governance. Many members of the KDE community
will be there either as direct representatives of KDE or on behalf of their
employer. A rough estimate puts our presence at about 10% of the 2
On Wednesday, June 08, 2011 21:56:00 Christoph Feck wrote:
> On Wednesday 08 June 2011 21:45:22 Shantanu Tushar Jha wrote:
> > Any suggestions on what Qt library I can use for
> > that? The library should be able to support extraction and compression on
> > all platforms Qt supports.
>
> If you ar
On Thursday, June 09, 2011 07:22:32 AM Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> Hi Scott,
>
> On Tuesday, June 07, 2011 03:13:43 Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > It may be that there was more to the release implications of the git
> > transition than "we're sure it'll get figured out by people who actually
> > care ab
Hi Scott,
On Tuesday, June 07, 2011 03:13:43 Scott Kitterman wrote:
> It may be that there was more to the release implications of the git
> transition than "we're sure it'll get figured out by people who actually
> care about releases", but if there was it's not apparent to me.
I don't think the
On Friday, June 03, 2011 23:12:03 Stefan Majewsky wrote:
> I've been looking into QML again for kdegames. Some background: I
> added a QDeclarativeImageProvider to feed images from libtagaro's
> ThemeProvider into QML, and that mostly works (with an emphasis on
> mostly; QTBUG-14900). Then I tried
18 matches
Mail list logo
