On Tuesday, 8 de February de 2011 00:44:48 Arno Rehn wrote:
> On Monday 07 February 2011 23:25:02 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > On Monday, 7 de February de 2011 10:05:39 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > > On Monday, February 7, 2011, Arno Rehn wrote:
> > > > shame if that feature went away I think. And I fin
Le Monday 07 February 2011, Aaron J. Seigo a écrit :
> On Monday, February 7, 2011, Arno Rehn wrote:
> > shame if that feature went away I think. And I find it hard to imagine
> > how many QFiles you would need to create to actually notice the drop in
> > performance.
>
> as i said, talk with Qt d
On Monday 07 February 2011 23:25:02 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Monday, 7 de February de 2011 10:05:39 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > On Monday, February 7, 2011, Arno Rehn wrote:
> > > shame if that feature went away I think. And I find it hard to imagine
> > > how many QFiles you would need to create
On Monday, 7 de February de 2011 10:05:39 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Monday, February 7, 2011, Arno Rehn wrote:
> > shame if that feature went away I think. And I find it hard to imagine
> > how many QFiles you would need to create to actually notice the drop in
> > performance.
>
> as i said, tal
On Monday, February 7, 2011, Arno Rehn wrote:
> shame if that feature went away I think. And I find it hard to imagine how
> many QFiles you would need to create to actually notice the drop in
> performance.
as i said, talk with Qt devs. it's apparently enough of a pain that there is a
desire to
On Monday 07 February 2011 18:03:57 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Saturday, February 5, 2011, Arno Rehn wrote:
> > In your main() function, create an instance of the attached class
>
> i'm not sure how long into the future i'd expect that to continue working
> as advertised, tbh. i've heard chatter a
On Saturday, February 5, 2011, Arno Rehn wrote:
> In your main() function, create an instance of the attached class
i'm not sure how long into the future i'd expect that to continue working as
advertised, tbh. i've heard chatter amongst Qt devs about wanting to get away
from FileEngines because
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 12:40 AM, Arno Rehn wrote:
> In your main() function, create an instance of the attached class (somewhere
> at the beginning, before you access anything with '%foo'). That's all you have
> to do. Looks like a cool idea to have this available in any KDE powered app.
>
> Docs: