Re: KNewStuff questions (uninstalling/providers)

2011-01-24 Thread Martin
Hi, > > The question is whether this is important enough or not. If it's a problem then we can skip the 4.6 backport. I just thought that it would be nice to have it there Please tell me about your final decision, whether to do do a backport or not. I will then commit my patch from reviewboard (a

Re: GSoC 2011!

2011-01-24 Thread Lydia Pintscher
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 22:08, todd rme wrote: > Is there any sort of general way to submit ideas for people who aren't > mentors? > > -Todd The best way is to talk to the team in KDE who'd be responsible for the idea and see if they have someone who's willing to mentor it. If you don't know who

Re: KNewStuff questions (uninstalling/providers)

2011-01-24 Thread Kevin Krammer
On Monday, 2011-01-24, Martin wrote: > Hi, > > > > The question is whether this is important enough or not. > > If it's a problem then we can skip the 4.6 backport. > I just thought that it would be nice to have it there > > Please tell me about your final decision, whether to do do a backport o

Re: KNewStuff questions (uninstalling/providers)

2011-01-24 Thread Kevin Krammer
On Monday, 2011-01-24, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > A Dilluns, 24 de gener de 2011, Kevin Krammer va escriure: > > On Monday, 2011-01-24, Frederik Gladhorn wrote: > > > On Sunday 23. January 2011 19.10.07 Martin wrote: > > > > Hi Frederik, > > > > > > > > thanks for answering :) > > > > > > > > > I

Re: KNewStuff questions (uninstalling/providers)

2011-01-24 Thread Albert Astals Cid
A Dilluns, 24 de gener de 2011, Kevin Krammer va escriure: > On Monday, 2011-01-24, Frederik Gladhorn wrote: > > On Sunday 23. January 2011 19.10.07 Martin wrote: > > > Hi Frederik, > > > > > > thanks for answering :) > > > > > > > It would be easy to extend this class to also allow uninstalling: