Re: Another proposal for modernization of our infrastructure

Hello, First of all, thank you Boud for the wise words. On Tuesday 03 February 2015 11:17:59 Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > On Mon, 2 Feb 2015, Milian Wolff wrote: > > Sigh, I find it highly sad to read this over and over again. > > Well, this whole discussion makes me extremely sad. What people have

Re: Build dependency issues with kdesrc-build

Hello, On Friday 06 February 2015 15:11:22 Kevin Funk wrote: > On Thursday 05 February 2015 22:16:54 Michael Pyne wrote: > > kdesrc-build will reorder modules into the right build order (assuming the > > needed metadata in kde-build-metadata is present). > > > > However as of now it only reorders

Re: [Kde-pim] The Future or KDE PIM Releases

Hello, On Tuesday 14 April 2015 09:44:19 Sandro Knauß wrote: > > What's meant by "KDE Accounts"? > > well we also had a look into the code. It is a resource that will adds all > local users from kde to your kaddressbook. Oooh, that one... it's very important to me, I rely a lot on it. Can we re

Phabricator: Make it happen already!

Hello all, So we've been evaluating different options to modernize our tooling, and for some reason it looks like we're still waiting on some external pressure to pick one. I'll then try to be this external pressure with this war cry: Phaaab! Make it happen already! It is basically what I repo

Re: Fwd: Plasma Mobile Components -> Kirigami (?)

Hello, On Tuesday, 1 March 2016 18:30:23 CET Marco Martin wrote: > [...] > right now They are called Plasma mobile components, but the concern is > that "it depends on plasma", it's intended just to be used on plasma, > but that's not true. > Another name was proposed: Kirigami, below the rational

Re: Next Gen CI Will Be Moving to Production Shortly: Upcoming Changes

Hello, On Saturday, 6 May 2017 11:37:51 CEST Ben Cooksley wrote: > Which brings me to the third point of attention. We'll only be adding > projects to the Next Gen CI system at their request going forward. For > Frameworks, Applications and Plasma this is something which we're > essentially assumi

zanshin for kdereview

Hello, Zanshin has been around for a while and I should have requested it to move to Extragear a long time ago but somehow forgot. The discussion regarding the next gen CI reminded me of that. I hereby request Zanshin to be moved out of playground and into kdereview so that it gets the usual r

Re: zanshin for kdereview

Hello, On Tuesday, 6 June 2017 11:29:00 CEST Aleix Pol wrote: > On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 9:01 AM, Kevin Ottens wrote: > > Zanshin has been around for a while and I should have requested it to move > > to Extragear a long time ago but somehow forgot. The discussion regarding >

Zanshin is in kdereview

Hello, OK, this time it's the right one. :-) Zanshin is now in kdereview and aiming for extragear/pim. Please review away! Thanks in advance. Regards. -- Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net KDAB - proud supporter of KDE, http://www.kdab.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally

Re: Zanshin is in kdereview

Hello, On Thursday, 8 June 2017 13:03:35 CEST Jonathan Riddell wrote: > There's some GPL 2 only files in 3rdparty/kdepim, if they are used it > means the applications can only be copied as GPL 2, consider > contacting the copyright holders to fix this as it doesn't match the > rest of the source.

Re: Zanshin is in kdereview

Hello, On Thursday, 8 June 2017 19:24:54 CEST Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El dijous, 8 de juny de 2017, a les 9:36:51 CEST, Kevin Ottens va escriure: > > OK, this time it's the right one. :-) > > > > Zanshin is now in kdereview and aiming for extragear/pim. Please rev

Re: Zanshin is in kdereview

Hello, On Thursday, 8 June 2017 22:12:10 CEST Albert Astals Cid wrote: > Sincerely i'd just suggest to kill the 3rdparty folder altogether, if you're > concerned about people not being able to compile your thing you're better > server just providing an appimage/snap/flatpack. It's more that: 1)

Re: Zanshin is in kdereview

Hello, On Tuesday, 13 June 2017 00:07:01 CEST Albert Astals Cid wrote: > Have you read the page that speaks about how to write Messages.sh files? > It's quite good. Please read it and explain what you don't understand. It's more that I don't quite see clearly the distribution of the .po and such

Re: Zanshin is in kdereview

Hello, On Monday, 12 June 2017 16:48:26 CEST Jonathan Riddell wrote: > On 10 June 2017 at 14:08, Kevin Ottens wrote: > >> You have a release script in scripts/release.sh, consider using > >> kde:releaseme as extracting translations can be quite faffy and > >> r

Re: Zanshin is in kdereview

Hello, On Monday, 19 June 2017 18:56:39 CEST Luigi Toscano wrote: > On Monday, 19 June 2017 18:50:23 CEST Kevin Ottens wrote: > > On Tuesday, 13 June 2017 00:07:01 CEST Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > > Have you read the page that speaks about how to write Messages.sh files? >

Re: Zanshin is in kdereview

Hello, On Monday, 19 June 2017 21:49:26 CEST Jonathan Riddell wrote: > On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 09:36:39PM +0200, Kevin Ottens wrote: > > Looks like I just didn't clone at the right time. > > > > That said, there's something fishy with the signature: >

Re: Zanshin is in kdereview

Hello, On Monday, 19 June 2017 23:11:09 CEST Albert Astals Cid wrote: > That makes no sense, the kxmlgui code will call i18n(), so you need to have > it in a .mo file not on a .ts file. Fair enough, I abandoned that patch, did another one to switch to i18n everywhere instead: https://phabricator

Re: Zanshin is in kdereview

Hello, On Monday, 19 June 2017 21:50:16 CEST Luigi Toscano wrote: > Kevin Ottens ha scritto: > > On Monday, 19 June 2017 18:56:39 CEST Luigi Toscano wrote: > >> On Monday, 19 June 2017 18:50:23 CEST Kevin Ottens wrote: > >>> On Tuesday, 13 June 2017 00:07:0

Re: Zanshin is in kdereview

Hello, On Saturday, 10 June 2017 15:08:36 CEST Kevin Ottens wrote: > On Thursday, 8 June 2017 13:03:35 CEST Jonathan Riddell wrote: > > If I stop Akonadi it silently stops working, an error message might be > > informative. > > I'll see what can be done, I'll nee

Re: Zanshin is in kdereview

Hello, On Tuesday, 20 June 2017 22:14:33 CEST Kevin Ottens wrote: > On Monday, 19 June 2017 21:50:16 CEST Luigi Toscano wrote: > > [...] > > I'm not sure why you didn't like the above solution. > > Just more work over time, and I don't have the bandwidth ATM.

Re: Zanshin is in kdereview

Hello, On Friday, 23 June 2017 16:11:12 CEST Luigi Toscano wrote: > On Friday, 23 June 2017 16:08:31 CEST Kevin Ottens wrote: > > On Tuesday, 20 June 2017 22:14:33 CEST Kevin Ottens wrote: > > > On Monday, 19 June 2017 21:50:16 CEST Luigi Toscano wrote: > > > > [...

Re: Zanshin is in kdereview

Hello, On Thursday, 8 June 2017 09:36:51 CEST Kevin Ottens wrote: > OK, this time it's the right one. :-) > > Zanshin is now in kdereview and aiming for extragear/pim. Please review > away! > > Thanks in advance. So I pushed just now all the patches mentioned in t

Re: Zanshin is in kdereview

Hello, On Sunday, 25 June 2017 14:00:05 CEST Kevin Ottens wrote: > On Thursday, 8 June 2017 09:36:51 CEST Kevin Ottens wrote: > > OK, this time it's the right one. :-) > > > > Zanshin is now in kdereview and aiming for extragear/pim. Please review > > away! >

Re: Zanshin is in kdereview

Hello, On Sunday, 2 July 2017 13:52:48 CEST Sandro Knauß wrote: > > 2) the third one (libkdepim) I'm forbidden to link against since it's > > private API to kdepim (turned into a dumping ground apparently...). > > > > Obviously, as soon as libkdepim is cleaned up (which I regularly hear it's > > s

Re: Zanshin is in kdereview

Hello, On Sunday, 2 July 2017 12:33:47 CEST Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El diumenge, 2 de juliol de 2017, a les 1:58:52 CEST, Kevin Ottens va > > It's been a week now without objection or further change requests. It's > > been in kdereview for three weeks now. Shall

Re: KDE Review: Rust Qt Binding Generator

Hello, On Sunday, 3 September 2017 18:14:49 CEST Jos van den Oever wrote: > [...] > The idea of this binding generator is that you write each part in the most > appropriate language. Rust bindings for Qt are hard to get right and will > still have caveats for a while. With this generator, you writ

Re: KDE Review: Rust Qt Binding Generator

Hello, On Monday, 4 September 2017 09:43:46 CEST Jos van den Oever wrote: > Op maandag 4 september 2017 07:46:28 CEST schreef Kevin Ottens: > > On Sunday, 3 September 2017 18:14:49 CEST Jos van den Oever wrote: > > > [...] > > > The idea of this binding generator is

Reviving KAudioCreator

Hello all, I happen to be one of those poor souls who still rip CDs from time to time. I'm using Dolphin for that right now, but I miss the convenience of using KAudioCreator a while back. It looks like it's not released at all anymore. After a quick glance at the repository, it seems to be in

Re: Reviving KAudioCreator

Hello, On Friday, 22 December 2017 10:59:55 CET Boudhayan Gupta wrote: > I did a little work on KCompactDisc about two years ago (and also > looked at KAudioCreator), and then realised it hadn't been working for > a long time. [...] I think it was due to the audiocd kio not being available in the

Re: Reviving KAudioCreator

Hello, On Tuesday, 26 December 2017 23:18:00 CET Albert Astals Cid wrote: > One kind-of-big bug i'd like fixed is that it doesn't realize the encoder > command line is not there, i was waiting for like 5 minutes wondering why it > took so much to encode until i realized that i don't actaully have

Re: Importing kdiff3 - was - Re: Aw: Re: KDE inclusion

Hello, On Thursday, 25 January 2018 00:08:03 CET Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El dimecres, 24 de gener de 2018, a les 17:34:16 CET, Kevin Funk va escriure: > > On Wednesday, 24 January 2018 16:24:10 CET Michael Reeves wrote: > > > A little confused on where to start with this sponsor thing. > > >

Re: Importing kdiff3 - was - Re: Aw: Re: KDE inclusion

Hello, On Thursday, 25 January 2018 22:35:37 CET Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El dijous, 25 de gener de 2018, a les 9:01:10 CET, Kevin Ottens va escriure: > > On Thursday, 25 January 2018 00:08:03 CET Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > > As I did with the last person that also was confu

Re: CI system maintainability

mandatory... I know it's unpopular in KDE, and I advocated for "don't force a tool if you can get someone to look at your screen or pair with you" in the past. Clearly this compromise gets somewhat exploited and that's especially bad in the case of a fragile and central

Re: CI system maintainability

Hello, On Thursday, 28 March 2019 09:41:29 CET Luca Beltrame wrote: > In data giovedì 28 marzo 2019 09:29:22 CET, Kevin Ottens ha scritto: > > at your screen or pair with you" in the past. Clearly this compromise gets > > somewhat exploited and that's especially bad in

Re: CI system maintainability

Hello, On Thursday, 28 March 2019 10:08:54 CET Luca Beltrame wrote: > In data giovedì 28 marzo 2019 09:50:47 CET, Kevin Ottens ha scritto: > > I'd argue we're loosing more with the current state of PIM than we'd loose > > with mandatory reviews. > > Perhaps, i

Re: CI system maintainability

Hello, On Thursday, 28 March 2019 10:35:37 CET Luca Beltrame wrote: > In data giovedì 28 marzo 2019 10:32:39 CET, Kevin Ottens ha scritto: > > OK, to be fair not 100% today's situation because of the above. It was > > based on best judgment maybe we're missing su

Re: CI system maintainability

programmer :-) I think this is > especially important for projects like PIM, where most of us contribute at > work in between waiting for CI and replying to 15 Slack threads or in the > evening after a long day And this too of course. I fully support this message. ;-) Cheers. -- Kev

Re: CI system maintainability

friend told me when I started > to work on kde "We can't create a bug when we don't code..." And this is true, writing code will create bugs, that's why responsible people like safety nets even to the price of throughput. Now can we use a more adult tone again? Maybe re-read Dan's email again who has a more balanced view despite being in a similar situation? Regards. -- Kevin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: CI system maintainability

t regarding the state of the CI in PIM components. Although it's clear from the kde-pim list that the CI is making a lot of noise there. Either we collectively became too good at ignoring those emails, or it's too verbose (after all it's one email per component per build type, it piles up quickly). Regards. -- Kevin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: CI system maintainability

responsibility in carrying those duties for the well being of the project. > IMO this specific case is also a technical issue. Akonadi makes things > complicated (and it's already 13 years old, so it should be mature in the > meantime). Yes, it's byzantine really. And the user experience is still not great (to be polite), had to setup some new hardware recently and I was honestly almost to the point of throwing it all through the window. Regards. -- Kevin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: CI system maintainability

Hello, On Friday, 29 March 2019 09:43:44 CET Volker Krause wrote: > On Friday, 29 March 2019 08:59:59 CET Kevin Ottens wrote: > > On Thursday, 28 March 2019 21:53:06 CET Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > > Having mandatory reviews for a central and complex component like > &g

Re: CI system maintainability

code style, etc.). Regards. -- Kevin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: kaudiocreator to unmaintained

releases in KF5 time > > > > Obsolete technology > > Copying also the last maintainer. In fact I have one local commit which I forgot to push... from Dec 2017. I wanted to brush it up a bit and have it released again. Yes, I buy CDs and rip them to mp3 or flac. Call me old scho

Re: kaudiocreator to unmaintained

being said, it's been eons since I had anything in the regular applications collection. Could someone refresh me on what it entails to "make release"? Back in the day it was fairly transparent, if that's still so low on work I can easily say yes... if not I'll have to e

Re: kaudiocreator to unmaintained

epend on kdelibs4support. > > Has anyone attempted to port away from it? Not yet, but definitely something I want to tackle soon-ish. Regards. -- Kevin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: kaudiocreator to unmaintained

he last few months which kind of de facto makes him maintainer. ;-) Since I'd rather we have one project with a team size > 1 that two with a team size of 1, I'll retract my previous offer of reviving kaudiocreator and turn my attention to audex instead. Hopefully we can get it out of playgro

Re: Possible to move some KF5 frameworks to invent?

27;m genuinely surprised about that claim. Are we sure that it's not a setting on our instance forcing this? I'm currently working on a project where you can force push in non-protected branches without your own fork. Regards. -- Kevin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net enioka Ha

Re: Possible to move some KF5 frameworks to invent?

you can set extra rules based on such a wildcards scheme. Beside, this would put some order to that naming going forward, I see that as a bonus. Regards. -- Kevin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net enioka Haute Couture - proud patron of KDE, https://hc.enioka.com/en signature.asc Description

Re: Kup in KDE Review

ackup plans as > they want and each will have some settings. By the sound of it you might want to look into parameterized groups: https://api.kde.org/frameworks/kconfig/html/kconfig_compiler.html This feature has been there forever but is often overlooked. Regards. -- Kevin Ottens, http://ervin.ip

KF5 Update Meeting Minutes 2013-w35

Hello everyone, This is the minutes of the Week 35 KF5 meeting. As usual it has been held on #kde-devel at 4pm Paris time. Were present: afiestas, apol, d_ed, dfaure, mck182, mgraesslin, sebas, shadeslayer, teo, vHanda, wojtask9 and myself. Announcement: * I will be away three weeks, dfaure w

Re: KF5 Update Meeting Minutes 2013-w35

On Tuesday 27 August 2013 17:47:10 Alexander Neundorf wrote: > On Tuesday 27 August 2013, Kevin Ottens wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > > > This is the minutes of the Week 35 KF5 meeting. As usual it has been held > > on #kde-devel at 4pm Paris time. > > >

Re: Review Request 109551: port KPtyProcess to QProcess

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109551/ --- (Updated Sept. 23, 2013, 8:31 a.m.) Status -- This change has been di

Re: Review Request 108845: add support for SSSE3 and SSE4.2 in cpufeatures and for msvc

do so ASAP. - Kevin Ottens On May 22, 2013, 3:31 p.m., Patrick Spendrin wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://git.reviewboard

Re: Review Request 112367: Include the icon's theme in the cache key

> On Aug. 31, 2013, 7:11 a.m., David Faure wrote: > > I disagree. Making things slow to cover a really really corner case (mixing > > kde4 and kde5), while the solution already exists (clearing the cache when > > switching icon themes), doesn't seem very sensible to me. > > > > The point is re

Re: Review Request 112880: Added KColorSchemeToken class.

http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112880/#comment29913> Use "" for this include. - Kevin Ottens On Sept. 23, 2013, 2:43 p.m., Denis Kuplyakov wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mai

Re: Review Request 112816: Do not use internal headers in kcolorutilsdemo

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112816/ --- (Updated Sept. 24, 2013, 2:19 p.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks and

Re: Review Request 112816: Do not use internal headers in kcolorutilsdemo

that KColorSpaces become private, no need to export it anymore imo. - Kevin Ottens On Sept. 24, 2013, 2:19 p.m., Aurélien Gâteau wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://git.revi

KF5 Update Meeting Minutes 2013-w39

Hello everyone, This is the minutes of the Week 39 KF5 meeting. As usual it has been held on #kde-devel at 4pm Paris time. Were present: afiestas, agateau, apol, d_ed, dfaure, mck182, mgraesslin, sebas, shadeslayer, teo, vHanda, wojtask9 and myself. Announcement: * I will be away next week, a

KF5 Update Meeting Minutes 2013-w41

Hello everyone, This is the minutes of the Week 41 KF5 meeting. As usual it has been held on #kde-devel at 4pm Paris time. Were present: afiestas, agateau, apol, jpwhiting, mck182, sebas, shadeslayer, teo, vHanda, wojtask9 and myself. Announcement: * If you didn't read my email on stop the li

Re: Review Request 112367: Include the icon's theme in the cache key

ink it is much simpler than that: > -Theme is changed but cache is not nuked, we get wrong icons. > > My case is, KIconLoader should realize that the theme has changed and > nuke it without any external help. > > What is happening is, that KSharedDat

Re: Review Request 112880: Added KColorSchemeToken class.

> On Oct. 1, 2013, 2:47 p.m., Sebastian Kügler wrote: > > kdeui/colors/kcolorschemetoken.h, line 70 > > > > > > using int here loses the type-safety. Why no use the corresponding > > enums? It would also make the

Re: Review Request 112880: Added KColorSchemeToken class.

> On Sept. 24, 2013, 6:55 a.m., Kevin Ottens wrote: > > I'm not sure we can let that in for kdelibs 4.x / kdeui... David? Any > > opinion? > > > > If we ignore that point for the moment, and think in terms of KF5, ATM it > > would go with KColorScheme in

Re: Review Request 113205: Make KJob::result public for the new signal/slot syntax.

? We end up with both mechanisms for private signals in the same header otherwise. - Kevin Ottens On Oct. 12, 2013, 6:30 p.m., Mark Gaiser wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visi

Re: Packaging KDE Foundation 5 frameworks

Hello, On Wednesday 09 October 2013 11:10:03 Lubomir Rintel wrote: > I'm wondering what's your position on naming the packages? Does kf5-* > prefix (kf5-solid, kf5-extra-cmake-modules) make sense to you? OpenSUSE > seems to use that (except that they don't include the prefix for ECM). > [1] It do

Re: Review Request 101348: Add Activity Awareness to KFilePlaces* Widget (OnlyInActivity)

- On June 1, 2011, 6:07 a.m., Jeffery MacEachern wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101348/ > ---

Re: Review Request 113153: Deprecate KFileMetaDataWidget and KFileMetaDataConfigurationWidget

. - Kevin Ottens On Oct. 7, 2013, 5:01 p.m., Vishesh Handa wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://git.reviewboard.kde.

KF5 Update Meeting Minutes 2013-w42

Hello everyone, This is the minutes of the Week 42 KF5 meeting. As usual it has been held on #kde-devel at 4pm Paris time. Were present: afiestas, agateau, dfaure, dMaggot, jpwhiting, markg85, mck182, mgraesslin, sebas, shadeslayer, steveire, teo, vHanda and myself. Announcement: * We have a

Re: KF5 Update Meeting Minutes 2013-w42

On Wednesday 16 October 2013 19:17:06 Alexander Neundorf wrote: > On Tuesday 15 October 2013, Kevin Ottens wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > .. > > > * steveire recommends _LIBRARIES variables from Config files and the > > > > template, > > Is there a

Re: Review Request 108845: add support for SSSE3 and SSE4.2 in cpufeatures and for msvc

> On Sept. 23, 2013, 9:12 a.m., Kevin Ottens wrote: > > Any reason why this patch isn't committed yet? Please do so ASAP. Any news? I'll close it as discarded if I don't see any activity by next monday. - Kevin --

Re: Review Request 112367: Include the icon's theme in the cache key

ink it is much simpler than that: > -Theme is changed but cache is not nuked, we get wrong icons. > > My case is, KIconLoader should realize that the theme has changed and > nuke it without any external help. > > What is happening is, that KSharedDat

Re: Review Request 112880: Added KColorSchemeToken class.

frameworks branch and go into kdeclarative. - Kevin Ottens On Oct. 6, 2013, 7:24 p.m., Denis Kuplyakov wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://git.reviewboard.kde.

Re: Review Request 113299: KDirWatch code style: braces for one-liner conditionals

t the topic of the coding style shortly before the split. It might makes sense now to stick purely to the Qt style for KF5. - Kevin Ottens On Oct. 17, 2013, 4:19 a.m., Nicolás Alvarez wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically genera

Re: Review Request 113298: KDirWatch code style: cleanup whitespace.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113298/#review42078 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Kevin Ottens On Oct. 17, 2013, 7:53

KF5 Update Meeting Minutes 2013-w43

Hello everyone, This is the minutes of the Week 43 KF5 meeting. As usual it has been held on #kde-devel at 4pm Paris time. Were present: afiestas, agateau, dfaure, dMaggot, jpwhiting, mck182, PovAddict, sebas, teo, vHanda and myself. Announcement: * All new code should use qCDebug and friends

KF5 Update Meeting Minutes 2013-w44

Hello everyone, This is the minutes of the Week 43 KF5 meeting. As usual it has been held on #kde-devel at 4pm Paris time. Were present: afiestas, agateau, apol, arichardson, d_ed, dfaure, dMaggot, jpwhiting, sebas, svuorela, teo, vHanda and myself. Announcement: * dfaure's and my sponsoring

Re: Review Request 104222: Display recent documents in places bookmark by default

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104222/#review42652 --- Ship it! Looks fine to me. - Kevin Ottens On Oct. 27, 2013

Re: Review Request 113260: Port KTimeZoned to Qt5/KF5

look. - Kevin Ottens On Oct. 22, 2013, 4:49 p.m., Martin Klapetek wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://git.reviewboard

Re: Review Request 113260: Port KTimeZoned to Qt5/KF5

> On Nov. 4, 2013, 4:12 p.m., John Layt wrote: > > I've asked on the Qt Development list about Qt 5 Solaris support. I'm told > > it builds and works to some extent, and patches are welcome, but not > > without having been tested on a real Solaris build first, which I have no > > desire to do

KF5 Update Meeting Minutes 2013-w45

Hello everyone, This is the minutes of the Week 43 KF5 meeting. As usual it has been held on #kde-devel at 4pm Paris time. Were present: afiestas, agateau, apol, d_ed, dfaure, dMaggot, mgraesslin, Riddell, sandsmark, sebas, svuorela, teo and myself. * afiestas is working toward completion of

Re: Review Request 112880: Added KColorSchemeToken class.

> On Oct. 21, 2013, 11:22 a.m., Kevin Ottens wrote: > > To get in this patch would benefit from being based on the frameworks > > branch and go into kdeclarative. Any chance for an update? - Kevin --- This is a

KF5 Update Meeting Minutes 2013-w46

Hello everyone, This is the minutes of the Week 46 KF5 meeting. As usual it has been held on #kde-devel at 4pm Paris time. Were present: afiestas, agateau, apol, dfaure, dMaggot, jpwhiting, mdemeyer, mgraesslin, randomguy3, Riddell, sebas, svuorela and myself. Announcement: * I plan to open the

Re: Review Request 113503: make dbus dependency optional in JobWidgets

patch is abandoned? - Kevin Ottens On Oct. 30, 2013, 10:08 a.m., Sune Vuorela wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://git.reviewboard

KF5 Update Meeting Minutes 2013-w47

Hello everyone, This is the minutes of the Week 47 KF5 meeting. As usual it has been held on #kde-devel at 4pm Paris time. Were present: afiestas, agateau, apol, jpwhiting, mgraesslin, randomguy3, sebas, teo and myself. Announcement: * We're not yet ready for the splitting so it's postponed by

Re: Review Request 113503: make dbus dependency optional in JobWidgets

> On Nov. 15, 2013, 6:20 p.m., Kevin Ottens wrote: > > Any chance to see Stephen's comments addressed or this patch is abandoned? Last warning, I'll close it as discarded if it's not updated on my next roun

Re: Review Request 112880: Added KColorSchemeToken class.

> On Oct. 21, 2013, 11:22 a.m., Kevin Ottens wrote: > > To get in this patch would benefit from being based on the frameworks > > branch and go into kdeclarative. > > Kevin Ottens wrote: > Any chance for an update? > > Denis Kuplyakov wrote: > Yes

KF5 Update Meeting Minutes 2013-w48

Hello everyone, This is the minutes of the Week 48 KF5 meeting. As usual it has been held on #kde-devel at 4pm Paris time. Were present: afiestas, agateau, apol, dfaure, markg85, mgraesslin, miroslav, randomguy3, Riddell, sebas, svuorela, teo and myself. Announcement: * We're close to be ready

Re: Review Request 112463: Port SMB kioslave to KF5/Qt5

ce to see progress or should it be discarded? - Kevin Ottens On Sept. 2, 2013, 7:16 p.m., Mark Gaiser wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://git.reviewboard

Re: Review Request 112880: Added KColorSchemeToken class.

> On Oct. 21, 2013, 11:22 a.m., Kevin Ottens wrote: > > To get in this patch would benefit from being based on the frameworks > > branch and go into kdeclarative. > > Kevin Ottens wrote: > Any chance for an update? > > Denis Kuplyakov wrote: > Yes

Re: Review Request 112880: Added KColorSchemeToken class.

> On Oct. 21, 2013, 11:22 a.m., Kevin Ottens wrote: > > To get in this patch would benefit from being based on the frameworks > > branch and go into kdeclarative. > > Kevin Ottens wrote: > Any chance for an update? > > Denis Kuplyakov wrote: > Yes

Re: Review Request 112463: Port SMB kioslave to KF5/Qt5

pact toString(QUrl::PrettyDecoded).toUtf8() Avoids a temporary in the process. - Kevin Ottens On Dec. 1, 2013, 9:32 p.m., Mark Gaiser wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://gi

KF5 Update Meeting Minutes 2013-w52

Hello everyone, This is the minutes of the Week 52 KF5 meeting. As usual it has been held on #kde-devel at 4pm Paris time. Were present: alexmerry, apol and myself. Announcement: * I lined up that one to see who would show up, merry christmas! * alexmerry has been working on getting jenkins

KF5 Update Meeting Minutes Almost 2014

Hello everyone, This is the minutes of the last meeting of 2013. As usual it has been held on #kde-devel at 4pm Paris time. Were present: apol and myself. Announcement: * TP1 is almost ready, forwarding headers work missing * apol has been working on the header generation for KCoreAddons, KG

KDE Frameworks: Moving toward 5.0 final and Governance

Hello all, Now that TP1 is almost out of the door, it is time to move toward the final release and put in place the governance of KDE Frameworks. It is a very large and multi-faceted product, so we will need people with longer term commitment if we want it to shine on release day. ## What's le

Re: KDE Frameworks: Moving toward 5.0 final and Governance

Hello, On Monday 06 January 2014 09:33:38 Martin Graesslin wrote: > On Monday 06 January 2014 07:52:50 Kevin Ottens wrote: > > The current list of modules is there: > > http://community.kde.org/Frameworks/List > > > > As you can see there's quite some hol

Re: KDE Frameworks: Moving toward 5.0 final and Governance

On Monday 06 January 2014 22:26:27 Alexander Neundorf wrote: > IMO something like proposing the maintainers and approving them, similar to > Qt, would be good, i.e. at least some kind of "voting" by who we will be > "governed". Definitely something we'll need at some point. For bootstrapping I'm m

KF5 Update Meeting Minutes 2014-w2

Hello everyone, This is the minutes of the Week 48 KF5 meeting. As usual it has been held on #kde-devel at 4pm Paris time. Were present: afiestas, agateau, alexmerry, apol, d_ed, mck182, mgraesslin, Riddell, sandsmark, sebas, svuorela and myself. Announcement: * Happy new year! * TP1 is offi

Re: KDE Frameworks: Moving toward 5.0 final and Governance

On Tuesday 07 January 2014 07:22:01 Kevin Ottens wrote: > On Tuesday 07 January 2014 00:45:19 Christoph Feck wrote: > > On Monday 06 January 2014 23:54:46 Kevin Ottens wrote: > > > On Monday 06 January 2014 22:26:27 Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > > > IMO something like

Re: KF5 Update Meeting Minutes 2014-w2

Hello, As a reminder the maintainers list is available there: http://community.kde.org/Frameworks/List People willing to maintain a framework should put their name in the corresponding column. On Tuesday 07 January 2014 16:53:30 Kevin Ottens wrote: > * agateau plans to work on kapi

Re: KDE Frameworks: Moving toward 5.0 final and Governance

Hello, On Tuesday 07 January 2014 18:10:10 John Layt wrote: > On 6 January 2014 07:52, Kevin Ottens wrote: > > I urge everyone, and in particular people volunteering to maintain a > > framework, to do a pass of review of our code base and APIs to modernize > > them when appr

Re: KDE Frameworks: Moving toward 5.0 final and Governance

On Tuesday 07 January 2014 23:30:28 John Layt wrote: > On 7 January 2014 19:49, Kevin Ottens wrote: > >> Most of the > >> dialog code from there has been merged into Qt5.2, or is planned for > >> Qt 5.3, so needs deleting. I'm also wondering if we still nee

  1   2   3   >