On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Mark wrote:
> Well, in that direction.. it's not written in QML or anything.. :
> http://ppenz.blogspot.com/2011/08/introducing-dolphin-20.html
Just because Dolphin is being rewritten using itemviews-ng and
QGraphics* doesn't mean that it's heading towards the QML
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Stefan Majewsky
wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Mark wrote:
>>> Dolphin is going in the QML direction?
>>> Yes, I think a Juk rewritten in QML could be a good thing.
>>
>> Well, in that direction.. it's not written in QML or anything.. :
>> http://ppenz.
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Mark wrote:
> Ah oke. Just some idea i have now.. Right now someone is working on a
> Phonon QML thing.
SOMEONE? like seriously? :P
I guess I need to work on my public image a bit :P
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Mark wrote:
>> Dolphin is going in the QML direction?
>> Yes, I think a Juk rewritten in QML could be a good thing.
>
> Well, in that direction.. it's not written in QML or anything.. :
> http://ppenz.blogspot.com/2011/08/introducing-dolphin-20.html
Of course it d
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Tomaz Canabrava wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Mark wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Tomaz Canabrava wrote:
>>> juk should be a lightweigth music player, while amarok should be an
>>> all-featured media player. I say should because juk is in
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Mark wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Tomaz Canabrava wrote:
>> juk should be a lightweigth music player, while amarok should be an
>> all-featured media player. I say should because juk is in a stage
>> where it's not lightweigth, for the code there nee
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Tomaz Canabrava wrote:
> juk should be a lightweigth music player, while amarok should be an
> all-featured media player. I say should because juk is in a stage
> where it's not lightweigth, for the code there needs much love. that
> said, juk is part of KDE softwa
juk should be a lightweigth music player, while amarok should be an
all-featured media player. I say should because juk is in a stage
where it's not lightweigth, for the code there needs much love. that
said, juk is part of KDE software, while Amarok does not follow the
KDE rules to be part of the
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 12:08 AM, Lydia Pintscher
wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 03:15, Michael Pyne wrote:
>> On Monday, August 08, 2011 18:44:40 Tomaz Canabrava wrote:
>>> Juk is an easy target, and in need of love.
>>
>> Honestly I was going to recommend the same thing.
>>
>> I don't agree th
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 03:15, Michael Pyne wrote:
> On Monday, August 08, 2011 18:44:40 Tomaz Canabrava wrote:
>> Juk is an easy target, and in need of love.
>
> Honestly I was going to recommend the same thing.
>
> I don't agree that it's (all) easy (although there is certainly a lot of "low-
> h
On Monday, August 08, 2011 18:44:40 Tomaz Canabrava wrote:
> Juk is an easy target, and in need of love.
Honestly I was going to recommend the same thing.
I don't agree that it's (all) easy (although there is certainly a lot of "low-
hanging fruit"), but it does have the advantage that I'm at lea
Juk is an easy target, and in need of love.
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Lydia Pintscher wrote:
> Heya folks :)
>
> I'm at the Desktop Summit and was asked by someone for a smallish
> project that he could hack on in KDE and that needs help. Ideally he'd
> like to start hacking on it tomorrow
Heya folks :)
I'm at the Desktop Summit and was asked by someone for a smallish
project that he could hack on in KDE and that needs help. Ideally he'd
like to start hacking on it tomorrow and work more on it over the next
couple of days during the workshops.
If you have nice ideas please let me kn
13 matches
Mail list logo
