Well if we simply ignore the "private session" cookies in the cookie
management dialog, then the problem becomes much easier. One will only have
to add the concept of "private" cookies to the cookiejar and make sure
cookies marked as such are always treated as session cookies and only
available to
I though that way, too. My problem was just that implementing my ideas
about did not lead to a "working" solution. And I really cannot release
another time with a private "non-really-private" incognito mode.
About your difficulties, I can just say that, IMHO, "private session"
cookies have to be co
The issue looks very similar, yes.
2012/12/19 Sebastian Kügler
> On Tuesday, December 18, 2012 23:14:01 Dawit A wrote:
> > Well that is not entirely correct. We can definitely implement support
> for
> > private mode in the cookiejar itself easily. There are a couple of
> > approaches we can ta
On Tuesday, December 18, 2012 23:14:01 Dawit A wrote:
> Well that is not entirely correct. We can definitely implement support for
> private mode in the cookiejar itself easily. There are a couple of
> approaches we can take. The difficult part has always been how to handle
> the "private session"
Well that is not entirely correct. We can definitely implement support for
private mode in the cookiejar itself easily. There are a couple of
approaches we can take. The difficult part has always been how to handle
the "private session" cookies in the cookie management dialogs. Anyhow, I
promised t
Yes, I'm obviously trying.
My first attempt was a tiny change in the KCookieServer/KCookieJar API to
let people search just for persistent cookies.
But it failed.
I'm currently working on a second attempt following the same approach. If
not, I though about implementing a different jar for the priva
On Sunday 16 December 2012 18:41:31 andrea diamantini wrote:
> - New private browsing mode (NOT based on KIO, as it seems our cookiejar is
> not enough "malleable" for it. At least in kde4)
Are you working on patches to make it "malleable" enough in the future?
If you need something, make it happ
Hi all,
just a brief announce here saying that finally rekonq 2 code has been
merged in rekonq main repository. It's really not 100% new code, but I'll
be glad you can find one moment to review it.
Keys news I'll be glad to hear comments and hints about are:
- kwebapp remove and code reorganization
