On Thursday 06 December 2012 12:17:08 Diggory Hardy wrote:
> So you're suggesting that we (or someone) should somehow bring all
> implementations in line with an updated spec? How would one go about doing
> this? My aim was to make what KDE does more robust in the face of differing
> implementation
On 5 December 2012 22:35, David Faure wrote:
> On Friday 23 November 2012 02:58:36 Diggory Hardy wrote:
> > Dear list,
> >
> > Since this bug — https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=245482 — has not
> been
> > addressed and since it makes KDE's trash somewhat incompatible with other
> > implementa
On Friday 23 November 2012 02:58:36 Diggory Hardy wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> Since this bug — https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=245482 — has not been
> addressed and since it makes KDE's trash somewhat incompatible with other
> implementations, I thought I'd have a go at addressing it.
Great.
>
Dear list,
Since this bug — https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=245482 — has not been
addressed and since it makes KDE's trash somewhat incompatible with other
implementations, I thought I'd have a go at addressing it.
First, does anyone besides KDE use the ~/.local/share/Trash/metadata file?
It
