On Sat, 2012-05-19 at 10:52 -0400, Dawit A wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Ben Martin
> wrote:
> I'm wondering if there is a timeframe for KIO refresh in KDE5?
>
> Getting improved metadata handling in there would be a great
> benefit
> IMH
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Ben Martin wrote:
> I'm wondering if there is a timeframe for KIO refresh in KDE5?
>
> Getting improved metadata handling in there would be a great benefit
> IMHO. To the point where I might start attaching patches to that
> effect ;)
>
What does improved meta-d
On sábado, 19 de maio de 2012 13.31.21, Ben Martin wrote:
> I'm wondering if there is a timeframe for KIO refresh in KDE5?
There is no timeframe. I don't think that doing more work on KIO was scheduled
at all.
If you want to do that work, I suggest communicating with the current
framework develop
I'm wondering if there is a timeframe for KIO refresh in KDE5?
Getting improved metadata handling in there would be a great benefit
IMHO. To the point where I might start attaching patches to that
effect ;)
On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 09:52 +0200, todd rme wrote:
...
> One question I think might be worth asking is "what (if anything) is
> kio missing?" We have applications that do device or file access,
> such as ark and k3b, that are not using kio slaves for that access.
> Why not? Is it just a lack of t
On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 12:22 +0200, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Friday, May 11, 2012 21:33:35 Casper Clemence wrote:
> > Libferris is an awesome piece of technology. It provides not just the
> > traditional features of a VFS but a uniform method of access for
> > applications and users to a large and
On Friday, May 11, 2012 21:33:35 Casper Clemence wrote:
> Libferris is an awesome piece of technology. It provides not just the
> traditional features of a VFS but a uniform method of access for
> applications and users to a large and expanding range of things. It has
others have asked the "what d
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 10:33 PM, Casper Clemence wrote:
> I'm want to start a discussion, put an idea out there. I am also being
> pushy, on someone else's behalf.
>
> Although it may be a difficult discussion I think it would be a great shame
> to miss the opportunity to have it. I'm not trying
On Fri, 2012-05-11 at 21:33 +0100, Casper Clemence wrote:
...
>
> The discussions is this "what part should libferris take in the
> refresh of KIO in KDE Frameworks 5?"
>
>
> Ben Martin really should be involved in any discussion of a redesign
> at the very least. He clearly has put a lot of wor
On Sun, 2012-05-13 at 12:58 +0200, David Faure wrote:
> On Sunday 13 May 2012 11:32:46 Casper Clemence wrote:
> > * it mounts lots more than an ordinary VFS - including XML documents (so
> > the tree of the document can be browsed), databases, X (so that window
> > position and size for example can
I thought I would hihack a reply to the windows support response to this
message.
For me that hasn't ever really been a priority so there isn't much
support for it right now. The main issue would be the Linux file
monitoring used by the file:// module. Beyond that there are some POSIX
calls which
On 13 May 2012 11:58, David Faure wrote:
>
> On Sunday 13 May 2012 11:32:46 Casper Clemence wrote:
> > * it mounts lots more than an ordinary VFS - including XML documents (so
> > the tree of the document can be browsed), databases, X (so that window
> > position and size for example can be read a
In short it is a virtual file system. However it takes the concept further
in several respects (for a fuller answer read the "about" page):
* it mounts lots more than an ordinary VFS - including XML documents (so
the tree of the document can be browsed), databases, X (so that window
position and s
On Sunday 13 May 2012 11:32:46 Casper Clemence wrote:
> * it mounts lots more than an ordinary VFS - including XML documents (so
> the tree of the document can be browsed), databases, X (so that window
> position and size for example can be read and modified as if they were data
> in the filesystem
On Sunday, 2012-05-13, David Faure wrote:
> On Friday 11 May 2012 21:33:35 Casper Clemence wrote:
> > Libferris is an awesome piece of technology. It provides not just the
> > traditional features of a VFS but a uniform method of access for
> > applications and users to a large and expanding range
On domingo, 13 de maio de 2012 11.53.13, David Faure wrote:
> On Friday 11 May 2012 21:33:35 Casper Clemence wrote:
> > Libferris is an awesome piece of technology. It provides not just the
> > traditional features of a VFS but a uniform method of access for
> > applications and users to a large an
On Friday 11 May 2012 21:33:35 Casper Clemence wrote:
> Libferris is an awesome piece of technology. It provides not just the
> traditional features of a VFS but a uniform method of access for
> applications and users to a large and expanding range of things
What does it do exactly, and how?
--
Am 11.05.2012 22:33, schrieb Casper Clemence:
> I'm want to start a discussion, put an idea out there. I am also being
> pushy, on someone else's behalf.
>
> Although it may be a difficult discussion I think it would be a great
> shame to miss the opportunity to have it. I'm not trying to tell any
I'm want to start a discussion, put an idea out there. I am also being
pushy, on someone else's behalf.
Although it may be a difficult discussion I think it would be a great shame
to miss the opportunity to have it. I'm not trying to tell anyone to "do it
this way".
Please excuse me for saying "w
19 matches
Mail list logo
