Re: kdelibs git mess

2012-11-10 Thread David Faure
On Thursday 08 November 2012 19:31:30 Stephen Kelly wrote: > Christoph Feck wrote: > > Hi, > > > > my git foo is limited, but if I interpret http://ompldr.org/vZzZxaw > > correctly, then somehow master got merged into KDE/4.9 branch, > > meaning, for example, that Alex's commits to depend on cmake

Re: kdelibs git mess

2012-11-08 Thread Stephen Kelly
Christoph Feck wrote: > Hi, > > my git foo is limited, but if I interpret http://ompldr.org/vZzZxaw > correctly, then somehow master got merged into KDE/4.9 branch, > meaning, for example, that Alex's commits to depend on cmake 2.8.8 are > now in KDE/4.9 branch. > > I suggest to not to commit to

Re: kdelibs git mess

2012-11-08 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Thursday 08 November 2012, Christoph Feck wrote: > Hi, > > my git foo is limited, but if I interpret http://ompldr.org/vZzZxaw > correctly, then somehow master got merged into KDE/4.9 branch, > meaning, for example, that Alex's commits to depend on cmake 2.8.8 are > now in KDE/4.9 branch. > >

Re: kdelibs git mess

2012-11-08 Thread Allen Winter
On Thursday 08 November 2012 04:12:09 AM Christoph Feck wrote: > Hi, > > my git foo is limited, but if I interpret http://ompldr.org/vZzZxaw > correctly, then somehow master got merged into KDE/4.9 branch, > meaning, for example, that Alex's commits to depend on cmake 2.8.8 are > now in KDE/4.9

kdelibs git mess

2012-11-07 Thread Christoph Feck
Hi, my git foo is limited, but if I interpret http://ompldr.org/vZzZxaw correctly, then somehow master got merged into KDE/4.9 branch, meaning, for example, that Alex's commits to depend on cmake 2.8.8 are now in KDE/4.9 branch. I suggest to not to commit to kdelibs, until this is resolved.