On Wednesday, May 25, 2011 22:36:58 Alex Richardson wrote:
> I have a mostly finished port of kmenuedit on my machine. It uses a
> model/view based interface instead of the QTreeWidget.
that would be better than a simple port of the existing code. i'd be
interested in it when it's all the way fni
On Thursday, 26 de May de 2011 17:57:30 Leo Savernik wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 25. Mai 2011 schrieb Boudewijn Rempt:
> > No, I'm not joking. If QWidget/QPainter are declared "done" now, then
> > with Qt6, they will be gone, just like qt3support will be gone in Qt5.
> > And that will be in a relatively
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Leo Savernik wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 25. Mai 2011 schrieb Boudewijn Rempt:
>> No, I'm not joking. If QWidget/QPainter are declared "done" now, then with
>> Qt6, they will be gone, just like qt3support will be gone in Qt5. And that
>> will be in a relatively short pe
Am Mittwoch, 25. Mai 2011 schrieb Boudewijn Rempt:
> No, I'm not joking. If QWidget/QPainter are declared "done" now, then with
> Qt6, they will be gone, just like qt3support will be gone in Qt5. And that
> will be in a relatively short period of time: five years or so. Which
> might sound like a l
Am Mittwoch, 25. Mai 2011, 17:48:42 schrieb Aaron J. Seigo:
> hi :)
>
> i just finished pushing a set of changes to the (ironically named?)
> qt3support branch in kde-workspace which leaves no traces of qt3support or
> kde3support left in that module. huzzah!
>
> i'm ok with holding on to the bra
On Wednesday 25 May 2011, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 May 2011 May, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > A Wednesday, May 25, 2011, Boudewijn Rempt va escriure:
...
> > > (As well as QWidget/QPainter code, too, of course.)
> >
> > Hope you are really joking with this one.
>
> No, I'm not jok
A Wednesday, May 25, 2011, Boudewijn Rempt va escriure:
> On Wednesday 25 May 2011 May, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > A Wednesday, May 25, 2011, Boudewijn Rempt va escriure:
> > > Best get it removed everywhere as soon as possible.
> >
> > Disagree, removing it for the sake of removing it, is just
On Wednesday 25 May 2011, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> hi :)
>
> i just finished pushing a set of changes to the (ironically named?)
> qt3support branch in kde-workspace which leaves no traces of qt3support or
> kde3support left in that module. huzzah!
Cool :-)
> i'm ok with holding on to the branch
On Wednesday 25 May 2011 May, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> A Wednesday, May 25, 2011, Boudewijn Rempt va escriure:
> > On Wed, 25 May 2011, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > > A Wednesday, May 25, 2011, Aaron J. Seigo va escriure:
> > >> hi :)
> > >>
> > >> i just finished pushing a set of changes to the
A Wednesday, May 25, 2011, Boudewijn Rempt va escriure:
> On Wed, 25 May 2011, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > A Wednesday, May 25, 2011, Aaron J. Seigo va escriure:
> >> hi :)
> >>
> >> i just finished pushing a set of changes to the (ironically named?)
> >> qt3support branch in kde-workspace which
On Wed, 25 May 2011, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
A Wednesday, May 25, 2011, Aaron J. Seigo va escriure:
hi :)
i just finished pushing a set of changes to the (ironically named?)
qt3support branch in kde-workspace which leaves no traces of qt3support or
kde3support left in that module. huzzah!
i'
A Wednesday, May 25, 2011, Aaron J. Seigo va escriure:
> hi :)
>
> i just finished pushing a set of changes to the (ironically named?)
> qt3support branch in kde-workspace which leaves no traces of qt3support or
> kde3support left in that module. huzzah!
>
> i'm ok with holding on to the branch u
hi :)
i just finished pushing a set of changes to the (ironically named?) qt3support
branch in kde-workspace which leaves no traces of qt3support or kde3support
left in that module. huzzah!
i'm ok with holding on to the branch until 4.8, but if there is interest in
getting this into 4.7 it sho
13 matches
Mail list logo
