Re: Submitting Grantlee as a KF5 Framework

2020-02-20 Thread Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
Hi Daniel, Am Donnerstag, 20. Februar 2020, 22:14:29 CET schrieb Daniel Nicoletti: > Yes, an user just raised an issue which I fixed in one PR, > however the PR is 5yo, should I redo it in gitlab? > Shouldn't the GitHub repo be removed or marked as moved to KDE? Seems you missed that Grantlee for

Re: Submitting Grantlee as a KF5 Framework

2020-02-20 Thread Daniel Nicoletti
Yes, an user just raised an issue which I fixed in one PR, however the PR is 5yo, should I redo it in gitlab? Shouldn't the GitHub repo be removed or marked as moved to KDE? Em sáb., 21 de dez. de 2019 às 10:23, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau < kosse...@kde.org> escreveu: > Hi Stephen, > > Am Samstag,

Re: CMake config & target challenges on moving to KF5 namespace; dir structure & API dox (Re: Submitting Grantlee as a KF5 Framework)

2020-01-09 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 3:03 AM Stephen Kelly wrote: > > > On 28/12/2019 23:30, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: > > Why are you proposing to do a step back instead to the old state, which > > everyone including you considered not that satisfying? > > Because it's a temporary situation. We still ha

Re: CMake config & target challenges on moving to KF5 namespace; dir structure & API dox (Re: Submitting Grantlee as a KF5 Framework)

2019-12-30 Thread Dominik Haumann
Hi Steve, Stephen Kelly schrieb am Mo., 30. Dez. 2019, 11:57: > > On 30/12/2019 10:55, Christoph Cullmann wrote: > > Hi, > > > >>> With my KTextEditor hat on: KF6:TextDocument implies somehow a link > >>> to QTextDocument or KF6:TextEditor, which both is incorrect, right? > >> > >> QTextDocument

Re: CMake config & target challenges on moving to KF5 namespace; dir structure & API dox (Re: Submitting Grantlee as a KF5 Framework)

2019-12-30 Thread Stephen Kelly
On 30/12/2019 10:55, Christoph Cullmann wrote: Hi, With my KTextEditor hat on: KF6:TextDocument implies somehow a link to QTextDocument or KF6:TextEditor, which both is incorrect, right? QTextDocument is exactly what it's about, which makes the name KF6::TextDocument fully appropriate and c

Re: CMake config & target challenges on moving to KF5 namespace; dir structure & API dox (Re: Submitting Grantlee as a KF5 Framework)

2019-12-30 Thread Christoph Cullmann
Hi, With my KTextEditor hat on: KF6:TextDocument implies somehow a link to QTextDocument or KF6:TextEditor, which both is incorrect, right? QTextDocument is exactly what it's about, which makes the name KF6::TextDocument fully appropriate and correct. Before starting this work, let's clarify

Re: CMake config & target challenges on moving to KF5 namespace; dir structure & API dox (Re: Submitting Grantlee as a KF5 Framework)

2019-12-30 Thread Stephen Kelly
On 30/12/2019 08:55, Dominik Haumann wrote: Hi, Stephen Kelly mailto:steve...@gmail.com>> schrieb am So., 29. Dez. 2019, 15:03: On 28/12/2019 23:30, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: > Why are you proposing to do a step back instead to the old state, which > everyone including

Re: CMake config & target challenges on moving to KF5 namespace; dir structure & API dox (Re: Submitting Grantlee as a KF5 Framework)

2019-12-30 Thread Dominik Haumann
Hi, Stephen Kelly schrieb am So., 29. Dez. 2019, 15:03: > > On 28/12/2019 23:30, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: > > Why are you proposing to do a step back instead to the old state, which > > everyone including you considered not that satisfying? > > Because it's a temporary situation. We still

Re: CMake config & target challenges on moving to KF5 namespace; dir structure & API dox (Re: Submitting Grantlee as a KF5 Framework)

2019-12-29 Thread Stephen Kelly
On 28/12/2019 23:30, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: Why are you proposing to do a step back instead to the old state, which everyone including you considered not that satisfying? Because it's a temporary situation. We still have a way forward in KF6 (which will open in a few months). Gen

Re: CMake config & target challenges on moving to KF5 namespace; dir structure & API dox (Re: Submitting Grantlee as a KF5 Framework)

2019-12-28 Thread Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
Hi Stephen, Am Sonntag, 29. Dezember 2019, 00:10:50 CET schrieb Stephen Kelly: > On 22/12/2019 16:08, Stephen Kelly wrote: > > On 21/12/2019 23:55, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: > >> Perhaps joining the "Release Service" (formerly known as "KDE > >> Applications") > >> is a better place then, it

Re: CMake config & target challenges on moving to KF5 namespace; dir structure & API dox (Re: Submitting Grantlee as a KF5 Framework)

2019-12-28 Thread Stephen Kelly
On 22/12/2019 16:08, Stephen Kelly wrote: On 21/12/2019 23:55, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: Perhaps joining the "Release Service" (formerly known as "KDE Applications") is a better place then, it also contains a set of libraries already. That would serve the purpose of having releases hap

Re: Exemptions to try KF "grow" vs. consistent experience (Re: Submitting Grantlee as a KF5 Framework)

2019-12-28 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El divendres, 27 de desembre de 2019, a les 11:03:25 CET, Volker Krause va escriure: > On Thursday, 26 December 2019 19:25:09 CET Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > El dimarts, 24 de desembre de 2019, a les 13:05:23 CET, Friedrich W. H. > Kossebau va escriure: > > > Am Montag, 23. Dezember 2019, 09:57:

Re: Exemptions to try KF "grow" vs. consistent experience (Re: Submitting Grantlee as a KF5 Framework)

2019-12-27 Thread Dominik Haumann
Hi, Volker Krause schrieb am Fr., 27. Dez. 2019, 11:04: > On Thursday, 26 December 2019 19:25:09 CET Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > El dimarts, 24 de desembre de 2019, a les 13:05:23 CET, Friedrich W. H. > Kossebau va escriure: > > > Am Montag, 23. Dezember 2019, 09:57:57 CET schrieb Volker Krause

Re: Exemptions to try KF "grow" vs. consistent experience (Re: Submitting Grantlee as a KF5 Framework)

2019-12-27 Thread Volker Krause
On Thursday, 26 December 2019 19:25:09 CET Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El dimarts, 24 de desembre de 2019, a les 13:05:23 CET, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau va escriure: > > Am Montag, 23. Dezember 2019, 09:57:57 CET schrieb Volker Krause: > > > On Sunday, 22 December 2019 09:46:02 CET Dominik Haumann w

Re: Exemptions to try KF "grow" vs. consistent experience (Re: Submitting Grantlee as a KF5 Framework)

2019-12-26 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El dimarts, 24 de desembre de 2019, a les 13:05:23 CET, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau va escriure: > Am Montag, 23. Dezember 2019, 09:57:57 CET schrieb Volker Krause: > > On Sunday, 22 December 2019 09:46:02 CET Dominik Haumann wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > in any case, maybe the discussed points s

Exemptions to try KF "grow" vs. consistent experience (Re: Submitting Grantlee as a KF5 Framework)

2019-12-24 Thread Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
Am Montag, 23. Dezember 2019, 09:57:57 CET schrieb Volker Krause: > On Sunday, 22 December 2019 09:46:02 CET Dominik Haumann wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > in any case, maybe the discussed points should go to the KF6 workboard? > > https://phabricator.kde.org/project/view/310/ > > > > I indeed believ

Re: CMake config & target challenges on moving to KF5 namespace; dir structure & API dox (Re: Submitting Grantlee as a KF5 Framework)

2019-12-23 Thread Volker Krause
On Sunday, 22 December 2019 09:46:02 CET Dominik Haumann wrote: > Hi all, > > in any case, maybe the discussed points should go to the KF6 workboard? > https://phabricator.kde.org/project/view/310/ > > I indeed believe that consistency in the KF5 world is an important feature, > so Friedrich does

Re: CMake config & target challenges on moving to KF5 namespace; dir structure & API dox (Re: Submitting Grantlee as a KF5 Framework)

2019-12-22 Thread Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
Am Sonntag, 22. Dezember 2019, 17:08:15 CET schrieb Stephen Kelly: > On 21/12/2019 23:55, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: > > Perhaps joining the "Release Service" (formerly known as "KDE > > Applications") is a better place then, it also contains a set of > > libraries already. That would serve th

Re: CMake config & target challenges on moving to KF5 namespace; dir structure & API dox (Re: Submitting Grantlee as a KF5 Framework)

2019-12-22 Thread Stephen Kelly
On 21/12/2019 23:55, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: Perhaps joining the "Release Service" (formerly known as "KDE Applications") is a better place then, it also contains a set of libraries already. That would serve the purpose of having releases happening regularly. The goals of making Gran

Re: CMake config & target challenges on moving to KF5 namespace; dir structure & API dox (Re: Submitting Grantlee as a KF5 Framework)

2019-12-22 Thread Dominik Haumann
Hi all, in any case, maybe the discussed points should go to the KF6 workboard? https://phabricator.kde.org/project/view/310/ I indeed believe that consistency in the KF5 world is an important feature, so Friedrich does have a point here. Other framework additions had to adapt as well (what comes

Re: CMake config & target challenges on moving to KF5 namespace; dir structure & API dox (Re: Submitting Grantlee as a KF5 Framework)

2019-12-21 Thread Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
Am Samstag, 21. Dezember 2019, 23:32:10 CET schrieb Stephen Kelly: > On 21/12/2019 19:12, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: > > Am Samstag, 21. Dezember 2019, 13:03:17 CET schrieb Stephen Kelly: > >> Great, Grantlee is now available at g...@git.kde.org:grantlee.git. > >> > >> I've pushed a few commi

Re: CMake config & target challenges on moving to KF5 namespace; dir structure & API dox (Re: Submitting Grantlee as a KF5 Framework)

2019-12-21 Thread Stephen Kelly
On 21/12/2019 19:12, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: Am Samstag, 21. Dezember 2019, 13:03:17 CET schrieb Stephen Kelly: Great, Grantlee is now available at g...@git.kde.org:grantlee.git. I've pushed a few commits to make it depend on ECM etc. Once the review period is finished it can be part

Re: CMake config & target challenges on moving to KF5 namespace; dir structure & API dox (Re: Submitting Grantlee as a KF5 Framework)

2019-12-21 Thread Stephen Kelly
On 21/12/2019 21:33, Volker Krause wrote: * Attracting external components and having them opt to move under the Frameworks umbrella is a sign that we are doing things right IMHO. So let's make this easy for people and avoid scaring off their users by forcing a larger migration on them when joi

Re: CMake config & target challenges on moving to KF5 namespace; dir structure & API dox (Re: Submitting Grantlee as a KF5 Framework)

2019-12-21 Thread Volker Krause
On Saturday, 21 December 2019 20:12:48 CET Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: > Am Samstag, 21. Dezember 2019, 13:03:17 CET schrieb Stephen Kelly: > > Great, Grantlee is now available at g...@git.kde.org:grantlee.git. > > > > I've pushed a few commits to make it depend on ECM etc. > > > > Once the r

CMake config & target challenges on moving to KF5 namespace; dir structure & API dox (Re: Submitting Grantlee as a KF5 Framework)

2019-12-21 Thread Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
Am Samstag, 21. Dezember 2019, 13:03:17 CET schrieb Stephen Kelly: > Great, Grantlee is now available at g...@git.kde.org:grantlee.git. > > I've pushed a few commits to make it depend on ECM etc. > > Once the review period is finished it can be part of KF5 releases. There are quite some things w

Re: Submitting Grantlee as a KF5 Framework

2019-12-21 Thread laurent Montel
Le samedi 21 décembre 2019, 13:03:17 CET Stephen Kelly a écrit : > On 08/12/2019 10:12, laurent Montel wrote: > > Le dimanche 8 décembre 2019, 10:52:19 CET Volker Krause a écrit : > >> Hi, > >> > >> very happy to see Grantlee "coming home" :) > >> > >> Technically I think it's largely in line wit

Re: Submitting Grantlee as a KF5 Framework

2019-12-21 Thread Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
Hi Stephen, Am Samstag, 21. Dezember 2019, 13:03:17 CET schrieb Stephen Kelly: > Great, Grantlee is now available at g...@git.kde.org:grantlee.git. > > I've pushed a few commits to make it depend on ECM etc. You pushed only to github though it seems :) Forwarded your commits now to the master b

Re: Submitting Grantlee as a KF5 Framework

2019-12-21 Thread Stephen Kelly
On 08/12/2019 10:12, laurent Montel wrote: Le dimanche 8 décembre 2019, 10:52:19 CET Volker Krause a écrit : Hi, very happy to see Grantlee "coming home" :) Technically I think it's largely in line with Frameworks requirements already, and it has been reliably powering e.g. KMail's message v

Re: Submitting Grantlee as a KF5 Framework

2019-12-08 Thread laurent Montel
Le dimanche 8 décembre 2019, 10:52:19 CET Volker Krause a écrit : > Hi, > > very happy to see Grantlee "coming home" :) > > Technically I think it's largely in line with Frameworks requirements > already, and it has been reliably powering e.g. KMail's message viewer for > years. Moving to a faste

Re: Submitting Grantlee as a KF5 Framework

2019-12-08 Thread Volker Krause
Hi, very happy to see Grantlee "coming home" :) Technically I think it's largely in line with Frameworks requirements already, and it has been reliably powering e.g. KMail's message viewer for years. Moving to a faster and, more importantly, predictable release cycle would help us a lot with u

Submitting Grantlee as a KF5 Framework

2019-12-06 Thread Stephen Kelly
Hello, I have been developing Grantlee for over 10 years with contributions from a community of others mostly connected with KDE. https://github.com/steveire/grantlee I have not been able to maintain a reasonable release cadence of Grantlee in the last few years (last release 3 years ago)