I raised the issue on python-dev again, let's see what happens. In
case they accept this then at least for the python 3 version the
python fork could be removed after a few changes on my side (for
python 2 it would have to stay, but python 2 is legacy stuff anyways,
and updates to both my and the p
2012/12/26 Ben Cooksley :
> I see in that bug report that this was supposed to be referred to a
> Python development mailing list as a result of the objections of a
> single person in that bug. What was the result of that?
Hello!
Nothing, it just died. Here is the thread:
http://mail.python.org/p
2012/12/26 Sune Vuorela :
> On 2012-12-25, Sven Brauch wrote:
>> Also, I'm still not sure what exactly concerns you about security and
>> maintenance. Problems I see include increased build time, and
>> maintenance efforts for me personally in updating the fork, but none
>> really seem fatal. Can
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 5:59 AM, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On 2012-12-25, Sven Brauch wrote:
>> Also, I'm still not sure what exactly concerns you about security and
>> maintenance. Problems I see include increased build time, and
>> maintenance efforts for me personally in updating the fork, but non
On 2012-12-25, Sven Brauch wrote:
> Also, I'm still not sure what exactly concerns you about security and
> maintenance. Problems I see include increased build time, and
> maintenance efforts for me personally in updating the fork, but none
> really seem fatal. Can you elaborate a bit about which
2012/12/25 Pino Toscano :
> Hi,
>
> (please do not top-post, thanks.)
>
> Alle venerdì 21 dicembre 2012, Sven Brauch ha scritto:
>> the two-week review period for this project (kdev-python) has passed.
>> The only complaint raised was related to the python fork in the
>> repository. Was the necessa
Great. :)
I personally agree with the internal python reasoning, and it can be
changed later anyway if it turns out to be a real problem.
Laszlo
On 12/25/12, Sven Brauch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> since there were no further questions or complaints, I will consider
> kdev-python to have passed the review
Hi,
(please do not top-post, thanks.)
Alle venerdì 21 dicembre 2012, Sven Brauch ha scritto:
> the two-week review period for this project (kdev-python) has passed.
> The only complaint raised was related to the python fork in the
> repository. Was the necessarity of this sufficiently explained b
Hi,
since there were no further questions or complaints, I will consider
kdev-python to have passed the review process now. Thanks!
Greetings,
Sven
2012/12/21 Sven Brauch :
> Hello,
>
> the two-week review period for this project (kdev-python) has passed.
> The only complaint raised was related
Hello,
the two-week review period for this project (kdev-python) has passed.
The only complaint raised was related to the python fork in the
repository. Was the necessarity of this sufficiently explained by my
follow-up email, or does anyone think this issue needs further
discussion?
Best regards
Hi!
Yeah, basic python3 support is there (syntax works) but not all the
features are handled correctly, e.g. nonlocal is not implemented yet
etc.
As milian already said, for 1.5 there will probably be two versions, a
python 2 and a python 3 one. Most of the development from now on will
happen for
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Milian Wolff wrote:
> On Friday 07 December 2012 06:01:19 Laszlo Papp wrote:
> > > Out of the curiosity: how much python3 is available? Thank you for your
> > > work.
> >
> > python3 _support_
>
> please read http://scummos.blogspot.de/2012/11/kdev-python-14-stabl
On Friday 07 December 2012 06:01:19 Laszlo Papp wrote:
> > Out of the curiosity: how much python3 is available? Thank you for your
> > work.
>
> python3 _support_
please read http://scummos.blogspot.de/2012/11/kdev-python-14-stable-
released.html
1.5 will get python3 support
--
Milian Wolff
m..
Hello!
Unfortunately, I don't think it's possible to use an external version
of python. The official parser does not provide some of the
information which is required for proper static analysis; upstream
refused to accept my patches changing what would have been needed to
make it work (see http://
>
> Out of the curiosity: how much python3 is available? Thank you for your
> work.
>
python3 _support_
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 8:25 PM, Sven Brauch wrote:
> Hi!
>
> For quite exactly two years I have been working on integrating the
> Python scripting language into KDevelop. Recently this project, called
> kdev-python, has seen its first stable release (called 1.4 in order to
> match kdevplatform ver
Alle giovedì 6 dicembre 2012, Sven Brauch ha scritto:
> If you find any issues, please tell me so I can fix them as quickly
> as possible.
The embedded (and modified) copy of python 2.7.1 does not seem a good
idea... is there *really* no way to use an external (lib)python?
It seems python gets so
Hi!
For quite exactly two years I have been working on integrating the
Python scripting language into KDevelop. Recently this project, called
kdev-python, has seen its first stable release (called 1.4 in order to
match kdevplatform version numbers). The release seems to be
successful so far, no cr
18 matches
Mail list logo
