---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121755/
---
(Updated Aug. 4, 2015, 5:53 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been mar
> On Juli 30, 2015, 12:05 nachm., Thomas Lübking wrote:
> > This is Qt4, right?
> >
> > ::activateWindow() should be equivalent to "XSetInputFocus(display,
> > winId(), XRevertToParent, X11->time);" unless
> > a) _NET_ACTIVE_WINDOW is listed in _NET_SUPPORTED on the root window
> > (supposed t
> On Juli 30, 2015, 10:05 vorm., Thomas Lübking wrote:
> > This is Qt4, right?
> >
> > ::activateWindow() should be equivalent to "XSetInputFocus(display,
> > winId(), XRevertToParent, X11->time);" unless
> > a) _NET_ACTIVE_WINDOW is listed in _NET_SUPPORTED on the root window
> > (supposed to
> On Juli 30, 2015, 12:05 nachm., Thomas Lübking wrote:
> > This is Qt4, right?
> >
> > ::activateWindow() should be equivalent to "XSetInputFocus(display,
> > winId(), XRevertToParent, X11->time);" unless
> > a) _NET_ACTIVE_WINDOW is listed in _NET_SUPPORTED on the root window
> > (supposed t
> On Juli 30, 2015, 10:05 vorm., Thomas Lübking wrote:
> > This is Qt4, right?
> >
> > ::activateWindow() should be equivalent to "XSetInputFocus(display,
> > winId(), XRevertToParent, X11->time);" unless
> > a) _NET_ACTIVE_WINDOW is listed in _NET_SUPPORTED on the root window
> > (supposed to
> On Juli 30, 2015, 12:05 nachm., Thomas Lübking wrote:
> > This is Qt4, right?
> >
> > ::activateWindow() should be equivalent to "XSetInputFocus(display,
> > winId(), XRevertToParent, X11->time);" unless
> > a) _NET_ACTIVE_WINDOW is listed in _NET_SUPPORTED on the root window
> > (supposed t
> On Juli 30, 2015, 10:05 vorm., Thomas Lübking wrote:
> > This is Qt4, right?
> >
> > ::activateWindow() should be equivalent to "XSetInputFocus(display,
> > winId(), XRevertToParent, X11->time);" unless
> > a) _NET_ACTIVE_WINDOW is listed in _NET_SUPPORTED on the root window
> > (supposed to
> On Juli 31, 2015, 10:24 vorm., Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > the description makes a good commit message, so please make sure you use
> > that (apart from adding the BUG lines).
Yes, of course.
It's not my first commit to kde-workspace and I always handled it like that,
i.e. using my descri
> On Juli 30, 2015, 12:05 nachm., Thomas Lübking wrote:
> > This is Qt4, right?
> >
> > ::activateWindow() should be equivalent to "XSetInputFocus(display,
> > winId(), XRevertToParent, X11->time);" unless
> > a) _NET_ACTIVE_WINDOW is listed in _NET_SUPPORTED on the root window
> > (supposed t
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121755/#review83215
---
Ship it!
the description makes a good commit message, so plea
> On Juli 30, 2015, 10:05 vorm., Thomas Lübking wrote:
> > This is Qt4, right?
> >
> > ::activateWindow() should be equivalent to "XSetInputFocus(display,
> > winId(), XRevertToParent, X11->time);" unless
> > a) _NET_ACTIVE_WINDOW is listed in _NET_SUPPORTED on the root window
> > (supposed to
> On Juli 30, 2015, 12:05 nachm., Thomas Lübking wrote:
> > This is Qt4, right?
> >
> > ::activateWindow() should be equivalent to "XSetInputFocus(display,
> > winId(), XRevertToParent, X11->time);" unless
> > a) _NET_ACTIVE_WINDOW is listed in _NET_SUPPORTED on the root window
> > (supposed t
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121755/#review83168
---
This is Qt4, right?
::activateWindow() should be equivalent t
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121755/
---
Review request for kde-workspace, Thomas Lübking and Oswald Buddenhagen.
14 matches
Mail list logo