> On Oct. 8, 2014, 9:22 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > According to
> > https://techbase.kde.org/Policies/Binary_Compatibility_Issues_With_C++
> > "changing the const/volatile qualifiers of the function" is BIC
> >
> > Now the thing is if we allow BIC changes in frameworks like attica or n
> On Oct. 8, 2014, 3:22 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > According to
> > https://techbase.kde.org/Policies/Binary_Compatibility_Issues_With_C++
> > "changing the const/volatile qualifiers of the function" is BIC
> >
> > Now the thing is if we allow BIC changes in frameworks like attica or n
> On Oct. 8, 2014, 9:22 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > According to
> > https://techbase.kde.org/Policies/Binary_Compatibility_Issues_With_C++
> > "changing the const/volatile qualifiers of the function" is BIC
> >
> > Now the thing is if we allow BIC changes in frameworks like attica or n
> On Oct. 8, 2014, 3:22 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > According to
> > https://techbase.kde.org/Policies/Binary_Compatibility_Issues_With_C++
> > "changing the const/volatile qualifiers of the function" is BIC
> >
> > Now the thing is if we allow BIC changes in frameworks like attica or n
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120535/#review68095
---
According to
https://techbase.kde.org/Policies/Binary_Compati
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120535/
---
(Updated Oct. 8, 2014, 3:20 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks, kdel
