Re: Review Request 120406: ksysguardd: Avoid including IO-wait in CPU load.

2014-10-06 Thread Søren Holm
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120406/ --- (Updated okt. 6, 2014, 6:53 p.m.) Review request for kde-workspace and Jo

Re: Review Request 120406: ksysguardd: Avoid including IO-wait in CPU load.

2014-10-06 Thread Søren Holm
> On okt. 5, 2014, 10:29 a.m., Milian Wolff wrote: > > Hmm... there is no way to see the wait time anywhere then, right? I don't > > see a way to add individual columns for that. Maybe that should be > > re-thought for frameworks. I.e. keep the CPU% like now but add more columns > > for the in

Re: Review Request 120406: ksysguardd: Avoid including IO-wait in CPU load.

2014-10-06 Thread Søren Holm
> On okt. 5, 2014, 10:29 a.m., Milian Wolff wrote: > > Hmm... there is no way to see the wait time anywhere then, right? I don't > > see a way to add individual columns for that. Maybe that should be > > re-thought for frameworks. I.e. keep the CPU% like now but add more columns > > for the in

Re: Review Request 120406: ksysguardd: Avoid including IO-wait in CPU load.

2014-10-06 Thread Søren Holm
> On okt. 5, 2014, 10:29 a.m., Milian Wolff wrote: > > Hmm... there is no way to see the wait time anywhere then, right? I don't > > see a way to add individual columns for that. Maybe that should be > > re-thought for frameworks. I.e. keep the CPU% like now but add more columns > > for the in

Re: Review Request 120406: ksysguardd: Avoid including IO-wait in CPU load.

2014-10-06 Thread Thomas Lübking
> On Okt. 5, 2014, 10:29 vorm., Milian Wolff wrote: > > Hmm... there is no way to see the wait time anywhere then, right? I don't > > see a way to add individual columns for that. Maybe that should be > > re-thought for frameworks. I.e. keep the CPU% like now but add more columns > > for the i

Re: Review Request 120406: ksysguardd: Avoid including IO-wait in CPU load.

2014-10-06 Thread Martin Gräßlin
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120406/#review67978 --- as that is a change which might break "My Workflow"(TM) (expec

Re: Review Request 120406: ksysguardd: Avoid including IO-wait in CPU load.

2014-10-05 Thread Thomas Lübking
> On Okt. 5, 2014, 10:29 vorm., Milian Wolff wrote: > > Hmm... there is no way to see the wait time anywhere then, right? I don't > > see a way to add individual columns for that. Maybe that should be > > re-thought for frameworks. I.e. keep the CPU% like now but add more columns > > for the i

Re: Review Request 120406: ksysguardd: Avoid including IO-wait in CPU load.

2014-10-05 Thread Thomas Lübking
> On Okt. 5, 2014, 10:29 vorm., Milian Wolff wrote: > > Hmm... there is no way to see the wait time anywhere then, right? I don't > > see a way to add individual columns for that. Maybe that should be > > re-thought for frameworks. I.e. keep the CPU% like now but add more columns > > for the i

Re: Review Request 120406: ksysguardd: Avoid including IO-wait in CPU load.

2014-10-05 Thread Milian Wolff
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120406/#review67948 --- Hmm... there is no way to see the wait time anywhere then, rig

Re: Review Request 120406: ksysguardd: Avoid including IO-wait in CPU load.

2014-09-29 Thread Søren Holm
Giv en that my change will be accepted, but is it applied. I have not commit right. Søndag den 28. september 2014 15:07:51 skrev Søren Holm: > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://git.reviewboard.kde.or

Review Request 120406: ksysguardd: Avoid including IO-wait in CPU load.

2014-09-28 Thread Søren Holm
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120406/ --- Review request for kde-workspace. Repository: kde-workspace Description