Re: Review Request 109538: port KFileMetaDataReader to QProcess

2013-05-06 Thread Kevin Ottens
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109538/ --- (Updated May 6, 2013, 11:57 a.m.) Status -- This change has been disc

Re: Review Request 109538: port KFileMetaDataReader to QProcess

2013-03-18 Thread Kevin Ottens
> On March 17, 2013, 2:05 p.m., Vishesh Handa wrote: > > But why? KFileMetadataReader and the other KFileMetadataStuff should just > > be marked as deprecated. Why are we porting them? We already have better > > alternatives in the nepomuk-widgets repository. > > Martin Tobias Holmedahl Sandsm

Re: Review Request 109538: port KFileMetaDataReader to QProcess

2013-03-18 Thread Frank Reininghaus
> On March 17, 2013, 2:05 p.m., Vishesh Handa wrote: > > But why? KFileMetadataReader and the other KFileMetadataStuff should just > > be marked as deprecated. Why are we porting them? We already have better > > alternatives in the nepomuk-widgets repository. > > Martin Tobias Holmedahl Sandsm

Re: Review Request 109538: port KFileMetaDataReader to QProcess

2013-03-17 Thread Kevin Ottens
> On March 17, 2013, 2:05 p.m., Vishesh Handa wrote: > > But why? KFileMetadataReader and the other KFileMetadataStuff should just > > be marked as deprecated. Why are we porting them? We already have better > > alternatives in the nepomuk-widgets repository. > > Martin Tobias Holmedahl Sandsm

Re: Review Request 109538: port KFileMetaDataReader to QProcess

2013-03-17 Thread Vishesh Handa
> On March 17, 2013, 2:05 p.m., Vishesh Handa wrote: > > But why? KFileMetadataReader and the other KFileMetadataStuff should just > > be marked as deprecated. Why are we porting them? We already have better > > alternatives in the nepomuk-widgets repository. > > Martin Tobias Holmedahl Sandsm

Re: Review Request 109538: port KFileMetaDataReader to QProcess

2013-03-17 Thread Martin Tobias Holmedahl Sandsmark
> On March 17, 2013, 2:05 p.m., Vishesh Handa wrote: > > But why? KFileMetadataReader and the other KFileMetadataStuff should just > > be marked as deprecated. Why are we porting them? We already have better > > alternatives in the nepomuk-widgets repository. Because it was a simple user of KP

Re: Review Request 109538: port KFileMetaDataReader to QProcess

2013-03-17 Thread Vishesh Handa
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109538/#review29377 --- But why? KFileMetadataReader and the other KFileMetadataStuff s

Review Request 109538: port KFileMetaDataReader to QProcess

2013-03-17 Thread Martin Tobias Holmedahl Sandsmark
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109538/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks, kdelibs, David Faure, and Vishesh Handa.