> On May 29, 2011, 1:05 p.m., Thomas Lübking wrote:
> > Not sure wheher it's really worth it (though using ARGB over XShape might
> > actually bring better performance) but I assume the style (oxygen) can deal
> > this more efficiently (via polishment) and also globally (not only for the
> > f
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101463/#review13308
---
For the record, I have implemented a 'modified' version of Thom
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101463/
---
(Updated April 19, 2012, 11:29 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Base Apps.
C
> On May 29, 2011, 1:05 p.m., Thomas Lübking wrote:
> > Not sure wheher it's really worth it (though using ARGB over XShape might
> > actually bring better performance) but I assume the style (oxygen) can deal
> > this more efficiently (via polishment) and also globally (not only for the
> > f
> On May 29, 2011, 1:05 p.m., Thomas Lübking wrote:
> > Not sure wheher it's really worth it (though using ARGB over XShape might
> > actually bring better performance) but I assume the style (oxygen) can deal
> > this more efficiently (via polishment) and also globally (not only for the
> > f
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101463/#review3574
---
Not sure wheher it's really worth it (though using ARGB over XSh
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101463/#review3579
---
this patch is a total hack. while the idea of using argb for the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101463/
---
Review request for KDE Base Apps.
Summary
---
This patch makes dragge
