---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102802/
---
(Updated Oct. 18, 2011, 6:53 a.m.)
Review request for KDE Base Apps.
Cha
> On Oct. 14, 2011, 12:05 a.m., Christoph Feck wrote:
> > Nice, work, as always :) Only one question: Do the port spin boxes need the
> > "Port:" labels, as seen in the ASCII drawings from bug 147340? Or would it
> > clutter the interface? Maybe a "Hostname" and "Port" headline for the two
> >
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102802/
---
(Updated Oct. 14, 2011, 8:38 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Base Apps.
Des
> On Oct. 14, 2011, 12:05 a.m., Christoph Feck wrote:
> > Nice, work, as always :) Only one question: Do the port spin boxes need the
> > "Port:" labels, as seen in the ASCII drawings from bug 147340? Or would it
> > clutter the interface? Maybe a "Hostname" and "Port" headline for the two
> >
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102802/
---
(Updated Oct. 14, 2011, 5:32 a.m.)
Review request for KDE Base Apps.
Cha
> On Oct. 14, 2011, 12:05 a.m., Christoph Feck wrote:
> > Nice, work, as always :) Only one question: Do the port spin boxes need the
> > "Port:" labels, as seen in the ASCII drawings from bug 147340? Or would it
> > clutter the interface? Maybe a "Hostname" and "Port" headline for the two
> >
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102802/#review7304
---
Nice, work, as always :) Only one question: Do the port spin box
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102802/
---
Review request for KDE Base Apps.
Description
---
This patch complete