Re: Review Request: Prevent activation of tabs opened in the background

2013-01-02 Thread Commit Hook
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107048/#review24543 --- This review has been submitted with commit 506874cee8dff84fd13

Re: Review Request: Prevent activation of tabs opened in the background in konqueror

2013-01-02 Thread Commit Hook
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108017/#review24542 --- This review has been submitted with commit 94177c6268898177aed

Re: Review Request: Prevent activation of tabs opened in the background

2013-01-02 Thread David Faure
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107048/#review24415 --- Ship it! Ship It! - David Faure On Dec. 30, 2012, 1:37 a.m.

Review Request: Prevent activation of tabs opened in the background in konqueror

2012-12-29 Thread Dawit Alemayehu
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108017/ --- Review request for kdelibs and David Faure. Description --- This patc

Re: Review Request: Prevent activation of tabs opened in the background

2012-12-29 Thread Dawit Alemayehu
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107048/ --- (Updated Dec. 30, 2012, 1:37 a.m.) Review request for KDE Base Apps and Da

Re: Review Request: Prevent activation of tabs opened in the background

2012-12-24 Thread David Faure
> On Nov. 22, 2012, 11:04 a.m., David Faure wrote: > > Well, if setFocus() shouldn't trigger the PartManager, then the fix would > > be in PartManager itself. Otherwise the part manager and konqueror will > > have a different vision of the currently active part. > > > > In order to avoid break

Re: Review Request: Prevent activation of tabs opened in the background

2012-12-22 Thread Dawit Alemayehu
> On Nov. 22, 2012, 11:04 a.m., David Faure wrote: > > Well, if setFocus() shouldn't trigger the PartManager, then the fix would > > be in PartManager itself. Otherwise the part manager and konqueror will > > have a different vision of the currently active part. > > > > In order to avoid break

Re: Review Request: Prevent activation of tabs opened in the background

2012-11-22 Thread David Faure
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107048/#review22370 --- Well, if setFocus() shouldn't trigger the PartManager, then the

Re: Review Request: Prevent activation of tabs opened in the background

2012-11-15 Thread Commit Hook
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107048/#review22039 --- This review has been submitted with commit f1180645daa72b182f5

Re: Review Request: Prevent activation of tabs opened in the background

2012-10-30 Thread Dawit Alemayehu
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107048/ --- (Updated Oct. 30, 2012, 7:49 p.m.) Review request for KDE Base Apps and Da

Review Request: Prevent activation of tabs opened in the background

2012-10-26 Thread Dawit Alemayehu
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107048/ --- Review request for KDE Base Apps and David Faure. Description --- The