> On May 10, 2012, 8:41 a.m., David Faure wrote:
> > Preferred? I'm confused. Aren't the checked keywords the only ones that
> > work, and the other ones are disabled?
> >
> > IMHO this is enabled/disabled, not preferred (which sounds like the other
> > ones are working, just harder to reach)
> On May 10, 2012, 8:41 a.m., David Faure wrote:
> > Preferred? I'm confused. Aren't the checked keywords the only ones that
> > work, and the other ones are disabled?
> >
> > IMHO this is enabled/disabled, not preferred (which sounds like the other
> > ones are working, just harder to reach)
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104900/#review13653
---
Preferred? I'm confused. Aren't the checked keywords the only o
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104900/#review13631
---
This review has been submitted with commit
0707b07d3afb14870d5
> On May 9, 2012, 9:34 p.m., Andrea Diamantini wrote:
> > Ship It!
I like it. And code changes seem easy and safe.
- Andrea
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104900/#review1
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104900/#review13627
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Andrea Diamantini
On May 9, 2012, 8:35
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104900/
---
Review request for KDE Runtime.
Description
---
The following patch m
