> On March 22, 2011, 6:23 p.m., John Layt wrote:
> > My thoughts are if the anonymous tickbox is first focus it should be above
> > the username/password fields and the username/password fields should be
> > disabled if anonymous is selected. But that may look a little weird with
> > the text
> On March 22, 2011, 6:23 p.m., John Layt wrote:
> > My thoughts are if the anonymous tickbox is first focus it should be above
> > the username/password fields and the username/password fields should be
> > disabled if anonymous is selected. But that may look a little weird with
> > the text
> On March 22, 2011, 6:23 p.m., John Layt wrote:
> > My thoughts are if the anonymous tickbox is first focus it should be above
> > the username/password fields and the username/password fields should be
> > disabled if anonymous is selected. But that may look a little weird with
> > the text
> On March 22, 2011, 6:23 p.m., John Layt wrote:
> > My thoughts are if the anonymous tickbox is first focus it should be above
> > the username/password fields and the username/password fields should be
> > disabled if anonymous is selected. But that may look a little weird with
> > the text
> On March 22, 2011, 6:23 p.m., John Layt wrote:
> > My thoughts are if the anonymous tickbox is first focus it should be above
> > the username/password fields and the username/password fields should be
> > disabled if anonymous is selected. But that may look a little weird with
> > the text
> On March 22, 2011, 6:23 p.m., John Layt wrote:
> > My thoughts are if the anonymous tickbox is first focus it should be above
> > the username/password fields and the username/password fields should be
> > disabled if anonymous is selected. But that may look a little weird with
> > the text
> On March 22, 2011, 6:23 p.m., John Layt wrote:
> > My thoughts are if the anonymous tickbox is first focus it should be above
> > the username/password fields and the username/password fields should be
> > disabled if anonymous is selected. But that may look a little weird with
> > the text
> On March 22, 2011, 6:23 p.m., John Layt wrote:
> > My thoughts are if the anonymous tickbox is first focus it should be above
> > the username/password fields and the username/password fields should be
> > disabled if anonymous is selected. But that may look a little weird with
> > the text
> On March 22, 2011, 6:23 p.m., John Layt wrote:
> > My thoughts are if the anonymous tickbox is first focus it should be above
> > the username/password fields and the username/password fields should be
> > disabled if anonymous is selected. But that may look a little weird with
> > the text
> On March 22, 2011, 6:23 p.m., John Layt wrote:
> > My thoughts are if the anonymous tickbox is first focus it should be above
> > the username/password fields and the username/password fields should be
> > disabled if anonymous is selected. But that may look a little weird with
> > the text
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/100920/#review2106
---
My thoughts are if the anonymous tickbox is first focus it shoul
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/100920/
---
Review request for kdelibs.
Summary
---
The attached patch renames an
12 matches
Mail list logo
