---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103829/#review10273
---
This review has been submitted with commit
827d7cb30d61fca61be
> On Jan. 30, 2012, 10:21 p.m., Frank Reininghaus wrote:
> > AFAIK, changing the order of virtual member functions might break binary
> > compatibility:
> >
> > http://techbase.kde.org/Policies/Binary_Compatibility_Issues_With_C++
Sorry about that, I missed the "Branch: frameworks".
- Frank
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103829/#review10252
---
AFAIK, changing the order of virtual member functions might bre
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103829/#review10251
---
Ship it!
That looks pretty straightforward and makes sense.
-
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103829/
---
Review request for kdelibs and David Faure.
Description
---
According