Re: Review Request: KAuth support in KDM kcontrol module

2011-03-02 Thread cyberbeat
> On May 12, 2010, 1:33 p.m., Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > > > But on the other hand I can suggest probably a better place for this - > > > kdm itself ;) > > > > > no, it may very well make sense to accept way more than what should be > > permitted via the kcm. in fact, my own local setup is tot

Re: Review Request: KAuth support in KDM kcontrol module

2011-03-02 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
> On May 12, 2010, 1:33 p.m., Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > > > But on the other hand I can suggest probably a better place for this - > > > kdm itself ;) > > > > > no, it may very well make sense to accept way more than what should be > > permitted via the kcm. in fact, my own local setup is tot