---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102283/#review23938
---
This review has been submitted with commit
4b66601c7bb036c2904
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102283/#review23303
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Sebastian Trueg
On Aug. 10, 2011, 3:22
> On Wednesday 10 August 2011 15:22:51 Vishesh Handa wrote:
>> If I push it into the 'frameworks' branch, then it won't be a part of
>> KDE
>> until KDE Platform 5, which is quite far away.
>
> Yes, this is why we were talking about splitting out nepomuk into its own
> repo, since it's already sepa
On Wednesday 10 August 2011 15:22:51 Vishesh Handa wrote:
> If I push it into the 'frameworks' branch, then it won't be a part of KDE
> until KDE Platform 5, which is quite far away.
Yes, this is why we were talking about splitting out nepomuk into its own
repo, since it's already separate.
But
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102283/
---
(Updated Aug. 10, 2011, 3:22 p.m.)
Review request for kdelibs, Nepomuk and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102283/#review5602
---
IMHO we should not push this before having the support in the KI
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102283/
---
(Updated Aug. 10, 2011, 2:15 p.m.)
Review request for kdelibs, Nepomuk and
