Re: Required VS compiler

Hi, sorry for the late reply. On Sat, 26 Mar 2016 16:07:03 +0100 Dominik Haumann wrote: > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 7:51 AM, Thomas Friedrichsmeier > wrote: > > On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 22:07:57 +0100 > > Dominik Haumann wrote: > [...] > >> Therefore, I would like to propose v2015 as required compile

Re: Required VS compiler

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 7:51 AM, Thomas Friedrichsmeier wrote: > On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 22:07:57 +0100 > Dominik Haumann wrote: [...] >> Therefore, I would like to propose v2015 as required compiler >> and Qt5.6 as required Qt version on Windows, or are there >> reasons against it? > > I'll put it t

Re: Required VS compiler

Well, this thread is already split across two lists, so I'm cross-replying... On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 22:07:57 +0100 Dominik Haumann wrote: > I installed Qt 5.6.0 and MSVC 2015, and surprisingly Kate > including all its dependencies compiled out of the box. > > I still see QStringLiteral fixes from

Re: Fwd: Required VS compiler

Dominik Haumann wrote: > I still see QStringLiteral fixes from time to time on the commit > mailing list. Given MSVC 2015 Community Edition is available > just like v2013, and it seems to work I believe that committing > such fixes does not make sense, in fact, it often makes code > worse. If the

Fwd: Required VS compiler

Hi all, I installed Qt 5.6.0 and MSVC 2015, and surprisingly Kate including all its dependencies compiled out of the box. I still see QStringLiteral fixes from time to time on the commit mailing list. Given MSVC 2015 Community Edition is available just like v2013, and it seems to work I believe t