Hello,
2011/11/16 Albert Astals Cid :
> In case someone is interested since it has never mentioned in this list, there
> is a frameworks mailing list at kde-frameworks-devel
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
I won't comment on having a separate list or whatever, since t
On Sunday 20 November 2011 12.49.46 Thomas Friedrichsmeier wrote:
> > so, if we're very honest with the situation, what some people are
> > actually asking for is their feature to be released sooner, freeze and
> > devel plans non- withstanding.
[]
> > we already have a consensus position, we alrea
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 9:28 AM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> On Tuesday 22 November 2011, Alex Merry wrote:
>> On 20/11/11 20:57, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
>> > This sounds like a "If you are going to disagree we don't want you in"
>> > mantra, which is kind of worrying.
>>
>> I think it's more of
On Tuesday 22 November 2011, Alex Merry wrote:
> On 20/11/11 20:57, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > This sounds like a "If you are going to disagree we don't want you in"
> > mantra, which is kind of worrying.
>
> I think it's more of a "if you're going to keep returning to decisions
> that have alre
On 20/11/11 20:57, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
This sounds like a "If you are going to disagree we don't want you in" mantra,
which is kind of worrying.
I think it's more of a "if you're going to keep returning to decisions
that have already been made, we don't want you in".
I'm not sure creati
On 11/20/2011 09:57 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
A Dijous, 17 de novembre de 2011, Aaron J. Seigo vàreu escriure:
On Wednesday, November 16, 2011 09:48:15 Thomas Friedrichsmeier wrote:
On Wednesday 16 November 2011, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
In case someone is interested since it has never ment
A Dijous, 17 de novembre de 2011, Aaron J. Seigo vàreu escriure:
> On Wednesday, November 16, 2011 09:48:15 Thomas Friedrichsmeier wrote:
> > On Wednesday 16 November 2011, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > > In case someone is interested since it has never mentioned in this
> > > list, there is a frame
Hi,
I'll start with the bottom of your mail, and only add some clarifications after
that.
On Saturday 19 November 2011, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> so .. to summarize:
>
> * k-c-d needs more active guidance, and that guidance needs the support of
> core members of the community
>
> * decisions nee
On Saturday, November 19, 2011 21:03:50 Thomas Friedrichsmeier wrote:
> I don't want to play the blame-game. But I'm really worried about this
> tendency to take essential discussions to side-channels. So I'm sorry to
it worries me, too. we need to realize that it was our behaviour here on k-c-d
Hi,
I don't want to play the blame-game. But I'm really worried about this
tendency to take essential discussions to side-channels. So I'm sorry to
continue on one of those another lengthy meta discussions.
On Saturday 19 November 2011, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Thursday, November 17, 2011 18:
On Saturday, November 19, 2011 12:22:33 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> How about doing something similar for the frameworks stuff ?
> Use k-c-d, but prefix the subject with "KF5" or something.
that does not prevent people from derailing the discussions by sending off-
topic emails. noise is, unfortun
On Thursday, November 17, 2011 18:17:30 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> If the signal to noise ratio here is considered too low, then having the KF5
> discussions here
> * would have increased the signal, and thereby increased the SNR
this assumes that the tendency to noise on this list would not prev
On Saturday 19 November 2011, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Thursday, November 17, 2011 16:21:55 Steven Sroka wrote:
> > True, but then shouldnn't those interested in reviewboard patches go
> > read what's on the reviewboard?
>
> the point of having them CC'd here is so that discussion of patches are
On Thursday, November 17, 2011 16:21:55 Steven Sroka wrote:
> True, but then shouldnn't those interested in reviewboard patches go
> read what's on the reviewboard?
the point of having them CC'd here is so that discussion of patches are
visible to everyone involved in kdelibs development. with th
>2011/11/17 Andras Mantia :
> On Thursday, November 17, 2011 18:17:30 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
>> > i was not sure i agreed with that approach, but i have to say that
>> > the last few threads on this topic on k-c-d have supported their
>> > point :(
>> I would draw exactly the opposite conclusion
On Thursday, November 17, 2011 18:17:30 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > i was not sure i agreed with that approach, but i have to say that
> > the last few threads on this topic on k-c-d have supported their
> > point :(
> I would draw exactly the opposite conclusion.
>
> If the signal to noise rati
On Thursday 17 November 2011, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 16, 2011 09:48:15 Thomas Friedrichsmeier wrote:
> > On Wednesday 16 November 2011, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > > In case someone is interested since it has never mentioned in this
> > > list, there is a frameworks mailing
On Wednesday, November 16, 2011 09:48:15 Thomas Friedrichsmeier wrote:
> On Wednesday 16 November 2011, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > In case someone is interested since it has never mentioned in this list,
> > there is a frameworks mailing list at kde-frameworks-devel
> > https://mail.kde.org/mailm
On Wednesday 16 November 2011, Andras Mantia wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 16, 2011 09:48:15 Thomas Friedrichsmeier wrote:
> > So why have this discussion on a separate list, at all? Isn't that
> > just the� sort of topic that kde-core-devel is for?
>
> I agree...
>
> Andras
+1
Alex
On Wednesday, November 16, 2011 09:48:15 Thomas Friedrichsmeier wrote:
> So why have this discussion on a separate list, at all? Isn't that
> just the� sort of topic that kde-core-devel is for?
I agree...
Andras
A Dimecres, 16 de novembre de 2011, Thomas Friedrichsmeier vàreu escriure:
> On Wednesday 16 November 2011, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > In case someone is interested since it has never mentioned in this list,
> > there is a frameworks mailing list at kde-frameworks-devel
> > https://mail.kde.org/m
On Wednesday 16 November 2011, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> In case someone is interested since it has never mentioned in this list,
> there is a frameworks mailing list at kde-frameworks-devel
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
So why have this discussion on a separate lis
22 matches
Mail list logo
