On Sonntag, 27. März 2016 10:01:09 CEST Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On domingo, 27 de março de 2016 15:31:47 PDT Martin Koller wrote:
> > The latest openSuse (Leap 42.1) ships the Qt4 based kdepim, although it
> > uses plasma5 desktop.
> >
> > Speaking of it: given that openSuse decided against shipp
Hi all,
Due to dependency conflicts between libraptor and dependencies of
Oyranos, kolor-manager's builds for all Qt 4 variants have now been
removed. libraptor is a dependency of Soprano, and thus kdelibs, while
Oyranos is a dependency of kolor-manager.
Regards,
Ben
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> laurent Montel wrote:
>> Oh?:)
>> Fedora continue to support some programs which are not supported from
>> several years before kdepim5 ?
>
> Fedora would not have to do that if you were not removing functionality as
> large as entire applica
Le lundi 28 mars 2016, 00:50:20 CEST Kevin Kofler a écrit :
> laurent Montel wrote:
> > Oh?:)
> > Fedora continue to support some programs which are not supported from
> > several years before kdepim5 ?
>
> Fedora would not have to do that if you were not removing functionality as
> large as entir
Thank you all for your input. We have decided to remove all Qt4 builds that
a) Have a kf5 version in Release. b) Not actively developed.
This thread is ONLY about KDE CI builds. Nothing else.
Thank you
Scarlett
On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 3:50 PM, Kevin Kofler
wrote:
> laurent Montel wrote:
> > Oh?:
laurent Montel wrote:
> Oh?:)
> Fedora continue to support some programs which are not supported from
> several years before kdepim5 ?
Fedora would not have to do that if you were not removing functionality as
large as entire applications (!) between releases.
Also, KNode still works great, mayb
ystem is concerned, Baloo
>> has no Qt 4 branches and is Qt 5 only)
>>
>> You've two options here:
>> 1) Drop Qt 4 PIM.
>> 2) Reinstate Baloo's Qt 4 branches.
>>
>> I intend to carry out option #1 if there is no response to this.
>>
>&
options here:
> 1) Drop Qt 4 PIM.
> 2) Reinstate Baloo's Qt 4 branches.
>
> I intend to carry out option #1 if there is no response to this.
>
> As a general anecdote, the community needs to decide if we are going
> to continue releasing and supporting Qt 4 builds at all. C
On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 11:47 AM, Martin Klapetek wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 1:14 PM, Scarlett Clark <
> scarlett.gately.cl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> libaccounts-qt ( ktp stack I believe affected here ) will not build qt4
>>
>> https://build.kde.org/job/libaccounts-qt%20master%20latest-q
On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 1:14 PM, Scarlett Clark <
scarlett.gately.cl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> libaccounts-qt ( ktp stack I believe affected here ) will not build qt4
>
> https://build.kde.org/job/libaccounts-qt%20master%20latest-qt4/PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc/2/console
> Reading the log upstream
On Sunday, 27 March 2016 16:19:07 CEST laurent Montel wrote:
> >
> > The latest openSuse (Leap 42.1) ships the Qt4 based kdepim, although it
> > uses plasma5 desktop.
>
> It's opensuse problem :)
>
> > Speaking of it: given that openSuse decided against shipping KF5-based
> > PIM,
> > how stable
On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 10:20 AM, Kai Uwe Broulik
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > gwenview depends on baloo as well
>
> isn't Gwenview already released as kf5? At least I've been running it for
> years almost without a problem.
>
> Most of these are. We are talking about the qt4 builds in the CI. Projects
hav
Hi,> gwenview depends on baloo as well isn't Gwenview already released as kf5? At least I've been running it for years almost without a problem. Cheers, Kai Uwe
Unrelated to PIM We have others affected by various qt4 unsupported
upstream.
gwenview depends on baloo as well
libaccounts-qt ( ktp stack I believe affected here ) will not build qt4
https://build.kde.org/job/libaccounts-qt%20master%20latest-qt4/PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc/2/console
Reading the
On domingo, 27 de março de 2016 15:31:47 PDT Martin Koller wrote:
> The latest openSuse (Leap 42.1) ships the Qt4 based kdepim, although it uses
> plasma5 desktop.
>
> Speaking of it: given that openSuse decided against shipping KF5-based PIM,
> how stable is KF5-based PIM considered these days ?
On domingo, 27 de março de 2016 10:57:18 PDT Ben Cooksley wrote:
> As a general anecdote, the community needs to decide if we are going
> to continue releasing and supporting Qt 4 builds at all. Considering
> Qt 4 itself is EOL per upstream I believe, I think it's time we
> fo
Le dimanche 27 mars 2016, 15:31:47 CEST Martin Koller a écrit :
> On Sunday 27 March 2016 09:21:01 laurent Montel wrote:
> > Le dimanche 27 mars 2016, 10:57:18 CEST Ben Cooksley a écrit :
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > As part of the CI overhaul, we've attempted to perform a complete set
> > > of build
Le dimanche 27 mars 2016, 16:08:09 CEST Luigi Toscano a écrit :
> laurent Montel ha scritto:
> > Le dimanche 27 mars 2016, 14:02:26 CEST Luigi Toscano a écrit :
> >> laurent Montel ha scritto:
> >>> Le dimanche 27 mars 2016, 11:58:07 CEST Kevin Kofler a écrit :
> laurent Montel wrote:
> >
laurent Montel ha scritto:
> Le dimanche 27 mars 2016, 14:02:26 CEST Luigi Toscano a écrit :
>> laurent Montel ha scritto:
>>> Le dimanche 27 mars 2016, 11:58:07 CEST Kevin Kofler a écrit :
laurent Montel wrote:
> We will not create more release from kdepim4, no distro uses it even
> d
Le dimanche 27 mars 2016, 14:02:26 CEST Luigi Toscano a écrit :
> laurent Montel ha scritto:
> > Le dimanche 27 mars 2016, 11:58:07 CEST Kevin Kofler a écrit :
> >> laurent Montel wrote:
> >>> We will not create more release from kdepim4, no distro uses it even
> >>> debian :)
> >>
> >> Fedora wil
On Sunday 27 March 2016 09:21:01 laurent Montel wrote:
> Le dimanche 27 mars 2016, 10:57:18 CEST Ben Cooksley a écrit :
> > Hi all,
> >
> > As part of the CI overhaul, we've attempted to perform a complete set
> > of builds for Qt 4, as it's still (unfortunately) used.
> >
> > Sadly, as expected
laurent Montel ha scritto:
> Le dimanche 27 mars 2016, 11:58:07 CEST Kevin Kofler a écrit :
>> laurent Montel wrote:
>>> We will not create more release from kdepim4, no distro uses it even
>>> debian :)
>>
>> Fedora will ship (it's currently under review) a kdepim4 package containing
>> KNode and
Le dimanche 27 mars 2016, 11:58:07 CEST Kevin Kofler a écrit :
> laurent Montel wrote:
> > We will not create more release from kdepim4, no distro uses it even
> > debian :)
>
> Fedora will ship (it's currently under review) a kdepim4 package containing
> KNode and KTimeTracker, which are not incl
laurent Montel wrote:
> We will not create more release from kdepim4, no distro uses it even
> debian :)
Fedora will ship (it's currently under review) a kdepim4 package containing
KNode and KTimeTracker, which are not included in the new KF5 kdepim.
Kevin Kofler
; 1) Drop Qt 4 PIM.
> 2) Reinstate Baloo's Qt 4 branches.
>
> I intend to carry out option #1 if there is no response to this.
I vote for #1 too.
We will not create more release from kdepim4, no distro uses it even debian :)
So +1 for #1
Regards
>
> As a general anecdote, the c
eneral anecdote, the community needs to decide if we are going
to continue releasing and supporting Qt 4 builds at all. Considering
Qt 4 itself is EOL per upstream I believe, I think it's time we
followed suit.
Regards,
Ben
26 matches
Mail list logo
