On Wednesday 02 March 2011 15:31:21 Anders Lund wrote:
> On Onsdag den 2. marts 2011, Stefan Majewsky wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Marco Martin wrote:
> > > what about having two config file, a primary one that is the "real one"
> > > and a set of secondary ones that can be loaded a
On Onsdag den 2. marts 2011, Stefan Majewsky wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Marco Martin wrote:
> > what about having two config file, a primary one that is the "real one"
> > and a set of secondary ones that can be loaded and changed on the fly
> > depending on activity change?
>
> Pe
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Marco Martin wrote:
> what about having two config file, a primary one that is the "real one" and a
> set of secondary ones that can be loaded and changed on the fly depending on
> activity change?
Perfectly possible from the technical side thanks to KConfig, but:
On Sunday 27 February 2011, Jonathan Schmidt-Dominé wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > however, i don't think it's the right place for it
> > depends here why we want multiple configuration files.
> > to have things like a different set of bookmarks, a different set of file
> > open some mail folders hidden? that
Hi!
> however, i don't think it's the right place for it
> depends here why we want multiple configuration files.
> to have things like a different set of bookmarks, a different set of file
> open some mail folders hidden? that's something for activities, yes, but
> not to be achieved by the means
On Saturday 26 February 2011, Jonathan Schmidt-Dominé wrote:
> todd rme wrote:
> > Couldn't this be handled with activities?
>
> Graphical integration into the activities-concept would be probably nice,
> but actiities do not provide an implementation for multiple configuration-
> files.
well, an
todd rme wrote:
> Couldn't this be handled with activities?
Graphical integration into the activities-concept would be probably nice,
but actiities do not provide an implementation for multiple configuration-
files.
--
http://the-user.org/
> ... but then, I wonder if this works in any application, marble or kwrite
> for example does not appear to care ...
Well, quite often applications use more than one config-file.
--
http://the-user.org/
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 4:58 AM, Jonathan Schmidt-Dominé
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> In Mozilla-applications so called “profiles”, sets of user-configuration,
> are a quite common feature, Konqueror implements them, too. But wouldn't it
> be possibe to provide this feature for all KDE-applications by changin
On Lørdag den 26. februar 2011, Anders Lund wrote:
> Or use the --config
> option that kapplication provides ;)
... but then, I wonder if this works in any application, marble or kwrite for
example does not appear to care ...
--
Venlig hilsen,
Anders
On Lørdag den 26. februar 2011, Andreas Hartmetz wrote:
> On Saturday 26 February 2011 10:58:23 Jonathan Schmidt-Dominé wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > In Mozilla-applications so called “profiles”, sets of user-configuration,
> > are a quite common feature, Konqueror implements them, too. But wouldn't
> >
On Saturday 26 February 2011 10:58:23 Jonathan Schmidt-Dominé wrote:
> Hi!
>
> In Mozilla-applications so called “profiles”, sets of user-configuration,
> are a quite common feature, Konqueror implements them, too. But wouldn't it
> be possibe to provide this feature for all KDE-applications by ch
Hi!
In Mozilla-applications so called “profiles”, sets of user-configuration,
are a quite common feature, Konqueror implements them, too. But wouldn't it
be possibe to provide this feature for all KDE-applications by changing
KApplication, KConfig and friends? It should be possible to pass some
pa
13 matches
Mail list logo
