On Saturday, March 26, 2016 12:05:55 PM David Faure wrote:
> On Sunday 20 March 2016 18:43:04 Alexander Potashev wrote:
> > 2016-03-09 1:09 GMT+03:00 Kevin Funk :
> > > Added all versions from 5.5.0 to 5.19.0.
> >
> > 5.20.0 is out, could you please add it to Bugzilla as well?
>
> I have now inte
On Sunday 20 March 2016 18:43:04 Alexander Potashev wrote:
> 2016-03-09 1:09 GMT+03:00 Kevin Funk :
> > Added all versions from 5.5.0 to 5.19.0.
>
> 5.20.0 is out, could you please add it to Bugzilla as well?
I have now integrated Jonathan's script into release-tools, and I ran it for
5.20.0.
Wo
2016-03-09 1:09 GMT+03:00 Kevin Funk :
> Added all versions from 5.5.0 to 5.19.0.
5.20.0 is out, could you please add it to Bugzilla as well?
--
Alexander Potashev
Hi Vishesh,
Please find my comments below.
2016-03-16 23:40 GMT+03:00 Vishesh Handa :
> On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 7:57 PM, David Faure wrote:
>> So I think frameworks-baloo makes sense (and is consistent). The "users"
>> of the framework are application developers, who know how to find it in
>> b
On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 7:57 PM, David Faure wrote:
> On Saturday 12 March 2016 20:38:43 Vishesh Handa wrote:
>>
>> And from my point of view the user doesn't care if Baloo is part of
>> something called "Frameworks". There is a bug, they want to report it.
>> It's just added noise.
>
> Typically,
On Wednesday 16 March 2016 21:40:22 Vishesh Handa wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 7:57 PM, David Faure wrote:
> > On Saturday 12 March 2016 20:38:43 Vishesh Handa wrote:
> >>
> >> And from my point of view the user doesn't care if Baloo is part of
> >> something called "Frameworks". There is a bu
On Saturday 12 March 2016 04:02:11 Alexander Potashev wrote:
> I felt free and did the following:
>
> [...]
> 7. Created product frameworks-baloo and added
> versions 5.13.0+ [4]. Bugs for older, out-of-KF5 versions go into
> the "Baloo" product.
>
> 8. Added product "BalooWidgets", it's part of
Great!!
I also updated on january bugstest website with the latest version of
Bugzilla, that include a new API from upstream. Still not applied for
production.
Frédéric
On Saturday 12 March 2016 20:38:43 Vishesh Handa wrote:
>
> And from my point of view the user doesn't care if Baloo is part of
> something called "Frameworks". There is a bug, they want to report it.
> It's just added noise.
Typically, users report bugs in the app where they see them, and then
t
2016-03-12 22:38 GMT+03:00 Vishesh Handa :
> In the future, I would appreciate it if such decisions were run by the
> maintainer. I now have more work since my existing filters and
> bookmarks are now invalid. And the documentation which tells where to
> file a bug.
Hi Vishesh,
Sorry for not aski
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 4:02 AM, Alexander Potashev
wrote:
> 7. Created product frameworks-baloo and added versions 5.13.0+ [4].
> Bugs for older, out-of-KF5 versions go into the "Baloo" product.
>
For the record, this just doubles the number of places I need to look.
And from my point of view t
2016-03-09 1:40 GMT+03:00 Kevin Funk :
> On Wednesday, March 9, 2016 1:27:47 AM CET Alexander Potashev wrote:
>> 2016-03-09 1:09 GMT+03:00 Kevin Funk :
>> > Added all versions from 5.5.0 to 5.19.0.
>> >
>> > I've used this little gem here to "hammer" BKO:
>> > http://paste.ubuntu.com/15330672/
>>
On Tuesday 08 March 2016 23:09:33 Kevin Funk wrote:
> On Monday, March 7, 2016 1:23:01 PM CET Kevin Funk wrote:
> > Heh, nice one!
> >
> > I'll try this out on Frameworks when I find the time.
>
> Added all versions from 5.5.0 to 5.19.0.
Wow. Kevin and Jonathan, you're my heroes !
> http://pas
2016-03-07 8:10 GMT-03:00 Jonathan Riddell :
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 09:25:40AM +0100, Kevin Funk wrote:
>> Is there a way to batch-modify those versions? Obviously noone wants to go
>> through the Bugzilla UI, adding versions one-by-one for each(!) framework.
>> /me found [1].
>>
>> PS: It's not
On Wednesday, March 9, 2016 1:27:47 AM CET Alexander Potashev wrote:
> 2016-03-09 1:09 GMT+03:00 Kevin Funk :
> > Added all versions from 5.5.0 to 5.19.0.
> >
> > I've used this little gem here to "hammer" BKO:
> > http://paste.ubuntu.com/15330672/
>
> This was a wrong thing to do because e.g.
2016-03-09 1:09 GMT+03:00 Kevin Funk :
> Added all versions from 5.5.0 to 5.19.0.
>
> I've used this little gem here to "hammer" BKO:
> http://paste.ubuntu.com/15330672/
This was a wrong thing to do because e.g. bluez-qt did not have
releases 5.5.0 through 5.10.0.
--
Alexander Potashev
On Monday, March 7, 2016 1:23:01 PM CET Kevin Funk wrote:
> On Monday, March 7, 2016 11:10:13 AM CET Jonathan Riddell wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 09:25:40AM +0100, Kevin Funk wrote:
> > > Is there a way to batch-modify those versions? Obviously noone wants to
> > > go
> > > through the Bugzi
On Monday, March 7, 2016 11:10:13 AM CET Jonathan Riddell wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 09:25:40AM +0100, Kevin Funk wrote:
> > Is there a way to batch-modify those versions? Obviously noone wants to go
> > through the Bugzilla UI, adding versions one-by-one for each(!) framework.
> > /me found
On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 09:25:40AM +0100, Kevin Funk wrote:
> Is there a way to batch-modify those versions? Obviously noone wants to go
> through the Bugzilla UI, adding versions one-by-one for each(!) framework.
> /me found [1].
>
> PS: It's not just the case for frameworks, same applies to KDE
Heya,
The versions of some products on bugs.kde.org are quite out of date:
For example for frameworks:
https://bugs.kde.org/editproducts.cgi?action=edit&product=frameworks-solid
is at 5.9.0
https://bugs.kde.org/editproducts.cgi?action=edit&product=frameworks-khtml
is at 5.1.0
https://b
20 matches
Mail list logo
