right Ben,
I used wrong url... It work now...
Gilles Caulier
2013/2/8 Ben Cooksley
> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 10:30 PM, Gilles Caulier
> wrote:
> > It must be a right access failure i think
>
> Hi Gilles,
>
> >
> > I process private repository using my account name "cgilles"...
> >
> > but :
>
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 10:30 PM, Gilles Caulier
wrote:
> It must be a right access failure i think
Hi Gilles,
>
> I process private repository using my account name "cgilles"...
>
> but :
>
> [gilles@localhost Devel]$ git clone g...@git.kde.org:cgilles ./cgilles
> Cloning into './cgilles'...
> X
Thanks
Gilles
2013/2/7 Ivan Čukić
>
> > > You should migrate those to repositories under your scratch namespace
> > > on git.kde.org.
> >
> > Hi Ben,
> >
> > My scratch namespace ? I'm not sure to understand...
>
>
> http://community.kde.org/Sysadmin/GitKdeOrgManual#Personal_scratch_repositori
> > You should migrate those to repositories under your scratch namespace
> > on git.kde.org.
>
> Hi Ben,
>
> My scratch namespace ? I'm not sure to understand...
http://community.kde.org/Sysadmin/GitKdeOrgManual#Personal_scratch_repositories
Cheerio,
Ivan
2013/2/7 Ben Cooksley
> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 1:38 AM, Gilles Caulier
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
>
> Hi Gilles,
>
> >
> > What's about user home dir hosted in SVN repository which must be moved
> > somewhere is GIT.
> >
> > Typically, mine is here :
> >
> > http://websvn.kde.org/branches/work/~cgille
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 1:38 AM, Gilles Caulier wrote:
> Hi all,
Hi Gilles,
>
> What's about user home dir hosted in SVN repository which must be moved
> somewhere is GIT.
>
> Typically, mine is here :
>
> http://websvn.kde.org/branches/work/~cgilles/
You should migrate those to repositories und
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 1:26 AM, Marco Martin wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 January 2013, Nicolás Alvarez wrote:
>> The initial draft of the SVN shutdown plan is available on the community
>> wiki: http://community.kde.org/Sysadmin/SVNInfrastructureShutdown
>>
>> As you can see this is a long-term plan.
Hi all,
What's about user home dir hosted in SVN repository which must be moved
somewhere is GIT.
Typically, mine is here :
http://websvn.kde.org/branches/work/~cgilles/
Best
Gilles Caulier
2013/2/7 Marco Martin
> On Wednesday 02 January 2013, Nicolás Alvarez wrote:
> > The initial draft
On Wednesday 02 January 2013, Nicolás Alvarez wrote:
> The initial draft of the SVN shutdown plan is available on the community
> wiki: http://community.kde.org/Sysadmin/SVNInfrastructureShutdown
>
> As you can see this is a long-term plan. None of this is written in
> stone; any feedback is welco
El Dilluns, 21 de gener de 2013, a les 11:53:04, Ben Cooksley va escriure:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Luigi Toscano
wrote:
> > Ben Cooksley wrote:
> >> On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 06:52:32PM -0300, Nicolás Alvarez wrote:
>
Ben Cooksley wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Luigi Toscano
> wrote:
>> But it's not the same situation.
>> For what I remember, even if I was not an active contributor at that time,
>> the
>> new svn repository basically matched the content of the old one; moreover,
>> the
>> structu
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Burkhard Lück wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 2. Januar 2013, 18:52:32 schrieb Nicolás Alvarez:
>> The initial draft of the SVN shutdown plan is available on the community
>> wiki: http://community.kde.org/Sysadmin/SVNInfrastructureShutdown
>>
> http://community.kde.org/Sysa
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Luigi Toscano wrote:
> Ben Cooksley wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 06:52:32PM -0300, Nicolás Alvarez wrote:
http://community.kde.org/Sysadmin/SVNInfrastructureShutdown
>>
>> Hi Oswald,
>>
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Luigi Toscano wrote:
> Ben Cooksley wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 2:28 AM, Oliver Henshaw
>> wrote:
>>> On 4 January 2013 10:31, David Faure wrote:
The plan seems OK, except for the very last step, "final shutdown".
Please keep svn.kde.org arou
Am Mittwoch, 2. Januar 2013, 18:52:32 schrieb Nicolás Alvarez:
> The initial draft of the SVN shutdown plan is available on the community
> wiki: http://community.kde.org/Sysadmin/SVNInfrastructureShutdown
>
http://community.kde.org/Sysadmin/SVNInfrastructureShutdown#Note says:
"The only exceptio
Ben Cooksley wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 2:28 AM, Oliver Henshaw
> wrote:
>> On 4 January 2013 10:31, David Faure wrote:
>>> The plan seems OK, except for the very last step, "final shutdown".
>>>
>>> Please keep svn.kde.org around, readonly.
>>> [...] so if we could just keep a readonly svn
Ben Cooksley wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 06:52:32PM -0300, Nicolás Alvarez wrote:
>>> http://community.kde.org/Sysadmin/SVNInfrastructureShutdown
>
> Hi Oswald,
>
>>>
>> this whole thing ignores that svn is still simply the bette
On 2013-01-12 23:24, Ben Cooksley wrote:
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 3:26 AM, Urs Wolfer wrote:
On 2013-01-02 22:52, Nicolás Alvarez wrote:
Hello KDE developers!
As you know, a few years ago KDE decided to move to Git, and a lot
of
our applications were migrated. However, we're not done yet. SV
On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 06:52:32PM -0300, Nicolás Alvarez wrote:
>> http://community.kde.org/Sysadmin/SVNInfrastructureShutdown
Hi Oswald,
>>
> this whole thing ignores that svn is still simply the better option for
> certain types of
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 3:26 AM, Urs Wolfer wrote:
> On 2013-01-02 22:52, Nicolás Alvarez wrote:
>>
>> Hello KDE developers!
>>
>> As you know, a few years ago KDE decided to move to Git, and a lot of
>> our applications were migrated. However, we're not done yet. SVN is
>> still alive and kicking,
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 2:28 AM, Oliver Henshaw
wrote:
> On 4 January 2013 10:31, David Faure wrote:
>> The plan seems OK, except for the very last step, "final shutdown".
>>
>> Please keep svn.kde.org around, readonly.
>> [...] so if we could just keep a readonly svn
>> around (surely this shoul
On 4 January 2013 10:31, David Faure wrote:
> The plan seems OK, except for the very last step, "final shutdown".
>
> Please keep svn.kde.org around, readonly.
> [...] so if we could just keep a readonly svn
> around (surely this shouldn't require much maintainance), it would be useful
> for arche
On 2013-01-02 22:52, Nicolás Alvarez wrote:
Hello KDE developers!
As you know, a few years ago KDE decided to move to Git, and a lot of
our applications were migrated. However, we're not done yet. SVN is
still alive and kicking, hosting kdeadmin, kdeartwork, kdenetwork,
kdesdk, several websites,
On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 06:52:32PM -0300, Nicolás Alvarez wrote:
> http://community.kde.org/Sysadmin/SVNInfrastructureShutdown
>
this whole thing ignores that svn is still simply the better option for
certain types of content - multimedia data in particular.
of course git could be hacked to Not Su
On Wednesday 02 January 2013 18:52:32 Nicolás Alvarez wrote:
> So it's time to plan the shutdown of our SVN infrastructure. We have
> written a timeline for the SVN decomissioning, for tasks such as
> removing SVN support from secondary services, stop giving SVN access
> to new developers, disablin
El 02/01/2013, a las 23:07, "T.C. Hollingsworth"
escribió:
> On 1/2/13, Nicolás Alvarez wrote:
>> any feedback is welcome!
>
> Why does commitfilter have to die? AFAICT, projects.kde.org offers
> exactly zero of it's features--all it has is a pretty `git log` and an
> RSS feed.
>
> Leaving as
Am Mittwoch, 2. Januar 2013, 19:07:36 schrieb T.C. Hollingsworth:
> On 1/2/13, Nicolás Alvarez wrote:
> > any feedback is welcome!
>
> Why does commitfilter have to die? AFAICT, projects.kde.org offers
> exactly zero of it's features--all it has is a pretty `git log` and an
> RSS feed.
>
> Leavin
2013/1/2, Nicolás Alvarez :
> So it's time to plan the shutdown of our SVN infrastructure. We have
> written a timeline for the SVN decomissioning, for tasks such as
> removing SVN support from secondary services, stop giving SVN access
> to new developers, disabling our anonsvn mirrors, and the fi
Hello KDE developers!
As you know, a few years ago KDE decided to move to Git, and a lot of
our applications were migrated. However, we're not done yet. SVN is
still alive and kicking, hosting kdeadmin, kdeartwork, kdenetwork,
kdesdk, several websites, many extragear and playground applications,
a
29 matches
Mail list logo
