Re: Koko in KDEReview

2021-05-05 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello, Disclaimer: likely a super useless email. On Wednesday, 5 May 2021 15:23:11 CEST Nate Graham wrote: > On 5/5/21 6:41 AM, Harald Sitter wrote: > > On 04.05.21 17:53, Carl Schwan wrote: > > Side note: this isn't a special need TBH ;) > > Pretty much everyone has that need. So much so that I

Re: Koko in KDEReview

2021-05-05 Thread Nate Graham
On 5/5/21 6:41 AM, Harald Sitter wrote: On 04.05.21 17:53, Carl Schwan wrote: Side note: this isn't a special need TBH ;) Pretty much everyone has that need. So much so that I kind of have a general game plan that there ought to be a kbugreport utility which is able to gobble up all the very spec

Re: Koko in KDEReview

2021-05-05 Thread Harald Sitter
On 04.05.21 17:53, Carl Schwan wrote: > Le mardi, mai 4, 2021 4:53 PM, Adriaan de Groot a écrit : > >> On Tuesday, 4 May 2021 15:50:27 CEST Halla Rempt wrote: >> >>> On Tuesday, 4 May 2021 15:28:30 CEST Nate Graham wrote: >>> I don't see anyone really trying to argue otherwise. >>> >>> I hav

Re: Koko in KDEReview

2021-05-04 Thread Nate Graham
On 5/4/21 1:23 PM, Ben Cooksley wrote: Side note here: It is actually possible to disable issues on Gitlab projects. Given that developers generally need a way to collaborate amongst themselves (as Phabricator tasks are used for) we leave the feature enabled however and generally don't all

Re: Koko in KDEReview

2021-05-04 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Wed, 5 May 2021, 1:28 am Nate Graham, wrote: > On 5/4/21 1:16 AM, Harald Sitter wrote: > > Every time the bugz vs gitlab schism comes up I eventually tune out with > > the distinct feeling that there is strong opposition to moving. What I, > > what we all, do not want is to end up with two sys

Re: Koko in KDEReview

2021-05-04 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Wed, 5 May 2021, 7:02 am Nate Graham, wrote: > On 5/4/21 12:57 PM, Alexander Semke wrote: > > Jira can do all of this, except of the tight integration with GitLab out > of > > the box maybe, and even more. I'm heavily using Jira at work on the > daily base > > and it's a very reliable and feat

Re: Koko in KDEReview

2021-05-04 Thread Nate Graham
On 5/4/21 12:57 PM, Alexander Semke wrote: Jira can do all of this, except of the tight integration with GitLab out of the box maybe, and even more. I'm heavily using Jira at work on the daily base and it's a very reliable and feature-rich tool for project management and issue tracking. Many open

Re: Koko in KDEReview

2021-05-04 Thread Alexander Semke
On Dienstag, 4. Mai 2021 18:09:53 CEST Nate Graham wrote: > * Far simpler interface means that it's harder to get confused and > accidentally add information in the wrong place > * Inline images makes it much easier to describe a bug visually compared > to BZ where images are attachments that you h

Re: Koko in KDEReview

2021-05-04 Thread Martin Flöser
Am Dienstag, 4. Mai 2021, 16:53:39 CEST schrieb Adriaan de Groot: > On Tuesday, 4 May 2021 15:50:27 CEST Halla Rempt wrote: > > On Tuesday, 4 May 2021 15:28:30 CEST Nate Graham wrote: > > > I don't see anyone really trying to argue otherwise. > > > > I have certainly made that argument many times.

Re: Koko in KDEReview

2021-05-04 Thread Nate Graham
On 5/4/21 8:54 AM, Halla Rempt wrote: On Tuesday, 4 May 2021 16:26:22 CEST Nate Graham wrote: Again, my point was not that everything about GLI is universally better than everything about BZ. Just that most things are mostly better in most ways that most of us care about. List them? I cannot

Re: Koko in KDEReview

2021-05-04 Thread Carl Schwan
Le mardi, mai 4, 2021 4:53 PM, Adriaan de Groot a écrit : > On Tuesday, 4 May 2021 15:50:27 CEST Halla Rempt wrote: > > > On Tuesday, 4 May 2021 15:28:30 CEST Nate Graham wrote: > > > > > I don't see anyone really trying to argue otherwise. > > > > I have certainly made that argument many times.

Re: Koko in KDEReview

2021-05-04 Thread Halla Rempt
On Tuesday, 4 May 2021 16:26:22 CEST Nate Graham wrote: > Again, my point was not that everything about GLI is universally better > than everything about BZ. Just that most things are mostly better in > most ways that most of us care about. List them? I cannot think of a single thing that's go

Re: Koko in KDEReview

2021-05-04 Thread Adriaan de Groot
On Tuesday, 4 May 2021 15:50:27 CEST Halla Rempt wrote: > On Tuesday, 4 May 2021 15:28:30 CEST Nate Graham wrote: > > I don't see anyone really trying to argue otherwise. > > I have certainly made that argument many times. Since only developers can > add tags, it will be impossible for ordinary us

Re: Koko in KDEReview

2021-05-04 Thread Nate Graham
On 5/4/21 7:50 AM, Halla Rempt wrote: On Tuesday, 4 May 2021 15:28:30 CEST Nate Graham wrote: I don't see anyone really trying to argue otherwise. I have certainly made that argument many times. Since only developers can add tags, it will be impossible for ordinary users to provide enough inf

Re: Koko in KDEReview

2021-05-04 Thread Nate Graham
On 5/4/21 8:10 AM, Harald Sitter wrote:> Sure, I suppose, I mean, not this conservation, this conversation was about koko and how it needs crash tracking because quite clearly there's opportunity for crashing. The reality right here right now is that drkonqi only sports bugz support and will not

Re: Koko in KDEReview

2021-05-04 Thread Harald Sitter
On 04.05.21 15:28, Nate Graham wrote: > On 5/4/21 1:16 AM, Harald Sitter wrote: >> Every time the bugz vs gitlab schism comes up I eventually tune out with >> the distinct feeling that there is strong opposition to moving. What I, >> what we all, do not want is to end up with two systems that requi

Re: Koko in KDEReview

2021-05-04 Thread Halla Rempt
On Tuesday, 4 May 2021 15:28:30 CEST Nate Graham wrote: > I don't see anyone really trying to argue otherwise. I have certainly made that argument many times. Since only developers can add tags, it will be impossible for ordinary users to provide enough information to classify the bug. Tagging s

Re: Koko in KDEReview

2021-05-04 Thread Nate Graham
On 5/4/21 1:16 AM, Harald Sitter wrote: Every time the bugz vs gitlab schism comes up I eventually tune out with the distinct feeling that there is strong opposition to moving. What I, what we all, do not want is to end up with two systems that require us to maintain two client libraries with dou

Re: Koko in KDEReview

2021-05-04 Thread Harald Sitter
On 04.05.21 00:07, Carl Schwan wrote: > Le lundi, mai 3, 2021 4:35 PM, Harald Sitter a écrit : > >> On 23.04.21 01:00, Carl Schwan wrote: >> > >>> - please get a bugzilla produce created for it > > > Not a fan of that. This will ends up exactly like the www bugs, something > t

Re: Koko in KDEReview

2021-05-03 Thread Michael Reeves
Please don't make my life hard with this kind of unilateral decision making if kde aa whole decides to move ro gitlab that's one thing. I am not going to keep dealing with users confusion caused by projects like yours engaging in undiscussed experiments for support. That.comes frim someone who woul

Re: Koko in KDEReview

2021-05-03 Thread Nate Graham
On 5/3/21 4:44 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: El dimarts, 4 de maig de 2021, a les 0:36:57 (CEST), Carl Schwan va escriure: "The project stays true to established practices" The established practice in KDE is clearly using bugzilla for bugs. Sure, but if we never investigated alternatives and st

Re: Koko in KDEReview

2021-05-03 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El dimarts, 4 de maig de 2021, a les 0:36:57 (CEST), Carl Schwan va escriure: > Le mardi, mai 4, 2021 12:21 AM, Albert Astals Cid a écrit : > > > El dimarts, 4 de maig de 2021, a les 0:07:19 (CEST), Carl Schwan va > > escriure: > > > > > Le lundi, mai 3, 2021 4:35 PM, Harald Sitter sit...@kde.or

Re: Koko in KDEReview

2021-05-03 Thread Carl Schwan
Le mardi, mai 4, 2021 12:21 AM, Albert Astals Cid a écrit : > El dimarts, 4 de maig de 2021, a les 0:07:19 (CEST), Carl Schwan va escriure: > > > Le lundi, mai 3, 2021 4:35 PM, Harald Sitter sit...@kde.org a écrit : > > > > > On 23.04.21 01:00, Carl Schwan wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > - please

Re: Koko in KDEReview

2021-05-03 Thread Nate Graham
On 5/3/21 4:21 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: El dimarts, 4 de maig de 2021, a les 0:07:19 (CEST), Carl Schwan va escriure: Le lundi, mai 3, 2021 4:35 PM, Harald Sitter a écrit : On 23.04.21 01:00, Carl Schwan wrote: Would you be open to an MR adding GitLab support to DrKonqi? We don't use g

Re: Koko in KDEReview

2021-05-03 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El dimarts, 4 de maig de 2021, a les 0:07:19 (CEST), Carl Schwan va escriure: > Le lundi, mai 3, 2021 4:35 PM, Harald Sitter a écrit : > > > On 23.04.21 01:00, Carl Schwan wrote: > > > > > > > > > - please get a bugzilla produce created for it > > > > > > > > > > Not a fan of that. This will en

Re: Koko in KDEReview

2021-05-03 Thread Carl Schwan
Le lundi, mai 3, 2021 4:35 PM, Harald Sitter a écrit : > On 23.04.21 01:00, Carl Schwan wrote: > > > > > > > - please get a bugzilla produce created for it > > > > > > > > Not a fan of that. This will ends up exactly like the www bugs, > > > > something > > > > that I look into every 6 months.

Re: Koko in KDEReview

2021-05-03 Thread Harald Sitter
On 23.04.21 01:00, Carl Schwan wrote: > - please get a bugzilla produce created for it >>> >>> Not a fan of that. This will ends up exactly like the www bugs, something >>> that I look into every 6 months. We already have many issues opened in >>> invent and it's working fine for us. >> >> Di

Re: Koko in KDEReview

2021-04-22 Thread Carl Schwan
Le mardi, mars 23, 2021 1:31 PM, Harald Sitter a écrit : > On 16.03.21 20:10, Carl Schwan wrote: > > > Le mardi, mars 16, 2021 12:55 PM, Harald Sitter sit...@kde.org a > > écrit : > > > > > On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 12:49 PM Harald Sitter sit...@kde.org wrote: > > > > > > Yay! > > > > Thanks for t

Re: Koko in KDEReview

2021-03-23 Thread Harald Sitter
On 16.03.21 20:10, Carl Schwan wrote: > Le mardi, mars 16, 2021 12:55 PM, Harald Sitter a écrit : > >> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 12:49 PM Harald Sitter sit...@kde.org wrote: >> > >>> Yay! > > Thanks for the big review :) > >>> > >>> - please get a bugzilla produce created for it > > Not a fa

Re: Koko in KDEReview

2021-03-18 Thread Volker Krause
On Dienstag, 16. März 2021 20:10:46 CET Carl Schwan wrote: > Le mardi, mars 16, 2021 12:55 PM, Harald Sitter a écrit : > > - since it doesn't appear in the UI, I can't check: is the geodata > > > > actually getting localized? at least the geocoder seems to spit out > > non-localized val

Re: Koko in KDEReview

2021-03-16 Thread Adriaan de Groot
On Tuesday, 16 March 2021 20:10:46 CET Carl Schwan wrote: > > > - on the topic of licensing: since the code base is really close to > > > complete reuse coverage it might be nice to push it over the finishing > > > line and then `reuse lint` it to not have it fall behind again > > This will be a

Re: Koko in KDEReview

2021-03-16 Thread Carl Schwan
ld like to move Koko to KDEReview. Koko is a convergent image > > > viewer that works on both Plasma Desktop and Plasma Mobile. It's the > > > second try of Koko in KDEReview, the first try failed1 because Koko > > > didn't really worked with traditional packaging

Re: Koko in KDEReview

2021-03-16 Thread Carl Schwan
Le mardi, mars 16, 2021 12:55 PM, Harald Sitter a écrit : > On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 12:49 PM Harald Sitter sit...@kde.org wrote: > > > Yay! Thanks for the big review :) > > > > - please get a bugzilla produce created for it Not a fan of that. This will ends up exactly like the www bugs, some

Re: Koko in KDEReview

2021-03-16 Thread Harald Sitter
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 12:49 PM Harald Sitter wrote: > > Yay! > > - please get a bugzilla produce created for it > - COPYING-CMAKE-SCRIPTS seems unused > - the find_package calls on qt5 probably should be versioned on > whatever version you actually tested with, currently it's unversioned > which

Re: Koko in KDEReview

2021-03-16 Thread Harald Sitter
Yay! - please get a bugzilla produce created for it - COPYING-CMAKE-SCRIPTS seems unused - the find_package calls on qt5 probably should be versioned on whatever version you actually tested with, currently it's unversioned which I doubt is correct - same for kquickimageeditor - kquickimageeditor i

Re: Koko in KDEReview

2021-03-13 Thread Nate Graham
On 3/13/21 4:22 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: I would really like if we had a kxmlgui equivalent for QtQuick that gave me the "configure shortcuts" and stuff functionality, but that's unrelated to koko :) +100 See also https://phabricator.kde.org/T13770 Nate

Re: Koko in KDEReview

2021-03-13 Thread Carl Schwan
and Plasma Mobile. It's the > > second try of Koko in KDEReview, the first try failed1 because Koko > > didn't really worked with traditional packaging and was too focused > > on the mobile usecase. > > Since the first attempt, a lot of things changed. There is

Re: Koko in KDEReview

2021-03-13 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El dissabte, 13 de març de 2021, a les 20:14:26 CET, Carl Schwan va escriure: > Hi, > > I would like to move Koko to KDEReview. Koko is a convergent image > viewer that works on both Plasma Desktop and Plasma Mobile. It's the > second try of Koko in KDEReview, the first try fa

Re: Koko in KDEReview

2021-03-13 Thread Ingo Klöcker
On Samstag, 13. März 2021 20:14:26 CET Carl Schwan wrote: > I would like to move Koko to KDEReview. Koko is a convergent image > viewer that works on both Plasma Desktop and Plasma Mobile. It's the > second try of Koko in KDEReview, the first try failed[1] because Koko > didn

Koko in KDEReview

2021-03-13 Thread Carl Schwan
Hi, I would like to move Koko to KDEReview. Koko is a convergent image viewer that works on both Plasma Desktop and Plasma Mobile. It's the second try of Koko in KDEReview, the first try failed[1] because Koko didn't really worked with traditional packaging and was too focused on