On 06/13/2012 10:58 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Dimecres, 13 de juny de 2012, a les 17:43:10, Vishesh Handa va escriure:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Sebastian Trüg wrote:
I am totally lost. What is the problem with that commit?
AFAIK, the problem is that changes were made in both So
The relevant commits have been reverted in the KDE/4.8.x branch.
This should fix the issues.
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 2:29 AM, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> El Dimecres, 13 de juny de 2012, a les 14:47:08, Will Stephenson va
> escriure:
> > > On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Sebastian Trüg
> wrote
El Dimecres, 13 de juny de 2012, a les 14:47:08, Will Stephenson va escriure:
> > On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Sebastian Trüg
wrote:
> > > I am totally lost. What is the problem with that commit?
> >
> > AFAIK, the problem is that changes were made in both Soprano and KDElibs
> > for 4.9, bu
El Dimecres, 13 de juny de 2012, a les 17:43:10, Vishesh Handa va escriure:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Sebastian Trüg wrote:
> > I am totally lost. What is the problem with that commit?
>
> AFAIK, the problem is that changes were made in both Soprano and KDElibs
> for 4.9, but for 4.8.4,
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Sebastian Trüg wrote:
> > I am totally lost. What is the problem with that commit?
>
> AFAIK, the problem is that changes were made in both Soprano and KDElibs
> for 4.9, but for 4.8.4, they are using this "changed" kdelibs with the old
> soprano.
Not correct -
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Sebastian Trüg wrote:
> I am totally lost. What is the problem with that commit?
AFAIK, the problem is that changes were made in both Soprano and KDElibs
for 4.9, but for 4.8.4, they are using this "changed" kdelibs with the old
soprano.
>
>
> On 06/12/2012 07
I am totally lost. What is the problem with that commit?
On 06/12/2012 07:40 PM, José Manuel Santamaría Lema wrote:
Therefore, I tend to think the kdelibs commit mentioned in that bug report
(3d66d429cb48781881af3e735f2a80af2114ab25) shouldn't have been done for
4.8.4. A confirmation from a Ne
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 12:33 AM, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On 2012-06-12, Sebastian Trüg wrote:
> > I do not have much time. But the real problem is that I am not sure
> > where to look. It has to do with my own implementation of unix socket
> > communication. Someone with experience in that a
On 2012-06-12, Sebastian Trüg wrote:
> I do not have much time. But the real problem is that I am not sure
> where to look. It has to do with my own implementation of unix socket
> communication. Someone with experience in that area might want to review
> the *Socket* classes in soprano/client.
On 06/12/2012 06:43 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Sune Vuorela mailto:nos...@vuorela.dk>> wrote:
On 2012-06-12, Vishesh Handa mailto:m...@vhanda.in>> wrote:
> --bcaec554d60626569204c246cba9
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Y
El Dimarts, 12 de juny de 2012, a les 19:23:38, Vishesh Handa va escriure:
> Yeah. So Nepomuk is the cause of the problems -
>
> Here our our options -
>
> 1. I revert Sebastian's commits in kdelibs. This should fix the issue, but
> we would need to reintroduce the changes for 4.9, and since we d
> Therefore, I tend to think the kdelibs commit mentioned in that bug report
> (3d66d429cb48781881af3e735f2a80af2114ab25) shouldn't have been done for
> 4.8.4. A confirmation from a Nepomuk developer would be highly
> appreciated.
Just in case it isn't obvious enough, actually I meant this one sh
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On 2012-06-12, Vishesh Handa wrote:
> > --bcaec554d60626569204c246cba9
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> >
> > Yeah. So Nepomuk is the cause of the problems -
> >
> > Here our our options -
> >
> > 1. I revert Sebastian's co
On 2012-06-12, Vishesh Handa wrote:
> --bcaec554d60626569204c246cba9
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Yeah. So Nepomuk is the cause of the problems -
>
> Here our our options -
>
> 1. I revert Sebastian's commits in kdelibs. This should fix the issue, but
> we would need to reint
Yeah. So Nepomuk is the cause of the problems -
Here our our options -
1. I revert Sebastian's commits in kdelibs. This should fix the issue, but
we would need to reintroduce the changes for 4.9, and since we do not have
separate branches ...
2. Sebastian should release a new version (2.8) of So
I just wanted to note, that the root of all those crashes is not an ABI-
breakage or a bug in kdelibs. It's once more a problem with threading and Qt
Sockets. The reason why >soprano-2.7.6 works is that it introduced
Soprano::Socket.
I already wrote it in another bug report, that I extracted a pa
On 06/10/2012 12:57 PM, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
Hi,
Am Sonntag, 10. Juni 2012 schrieb Peter Penz :
On 06/10/2012 11:20 AM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
On Sunday, June 10, 2012 03:23:04 José Manuel Santamaría Lema wrote:
#1 dolphin:
#2 gwenview
#6 konta
Hi,
Peter Penz
> The issue has been tracked at
> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=268064 - updating Soprano to the
> latest master resolves the crash. But I don't know more about the
> root-cause of this. Probably a Nepomuk-related update missed a proper
> versioning-check of Soprano?
There
El Diumenge, 10 de juny de 2012, a les 11:20:09, Aaron J. Seigo va escriure:
> On Sunday, June 10, 2012 03:23:04 José Manuel Santamaría Lema wrote:
> > #1 dolphin:
> > #2 gwenview
> > #6 kontact executing various components: calendar, to-do list, journal
> > #7 kmail links
>
> these are all the sa
El Diumenge, 10 de juny de 2012, a les 11:49:38, Anders Lund va escriure:
> Den 10-06-2012 11:38, Peter Penz skrev:
> > The issue has been tracked at
> > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=268064 - updating Soprano to the
> > latest master resolves the crash. But I don't know more about the
> > r
El Diumenge, 10 de juny de 2012, a les 12:57:09, Andreas Pakulat va escriure:
> Hi,
>
> Am Sonntag, 10. Juni 2012 schrieb Peter Penz :
> > On 06/10/2012 11:20 AM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> >> On Sunday, June 10, 2012 03:23:04 José Manuel Santamaría Lema wrote:
> >>> #1 dolphin:
> >>> #2 gwenview
> >
El Diumenge, 10 de juny de 2012, a les 11:30:13, Aaron J. Seigo va escriure:
> On Sunday, June 10, 2012 11:20:09 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > On Sunday, June 10, 2012 03:23:04 José Manuel Santamaría Lema wrote:
> > > #1 dolphin:
> > > #2 gwenview
> > > #6 kontact executing various components: calendar
Hello,
On sekmadienis 10 Birželis 2012 13:57:09 Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> There has been an abi breakage in soparano's latest release (fixed in the
> repository already), so updating to that soprano release requires
> rebuilding all other code that uses it. I've seen backtraces ending in
> qstring:
Hi,
Am Sonntag, 10. Juni 2012 schrieb Peter Penz :
> On 06/10/2012 11:20 AM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
>
>> On Sunday, June 10, 2012 03:23:04 José Manuel Santamaría Lema wrote:
>>
>>> #1 dolphin:
>>> #2 gwenview
>>> #6 kontact executing various components: calendar, to-do list, journal
>>> #7 kmail l
Den 10-06-2012 11:38, Peter Penz skrev:
The issue has been tracked at
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=268064 - updating Soprano to the
latest master resolves the crash. But I don't know more about the
root-cause of this. Probably a Nepomuk-related update missed a proper
versioning-check o
On 06/10/2012 11:20 AM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
On Sunday, June 10, 2012 03:23:04 José Manuel Santamaría Lema wrote:
#1 dolphin:
#2 gwenview
#6 kontact executing various components: calendar, to-do list, journal
#7 kmail links
these are all the same crash, or at least related to each other. it i
On Sunday, June 10, 2012 11:20:09 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Sunday, June 10, 2012 03:23:04 José Manuel Santamaría Lema wrote:
> > #1 dolphin:
> > #2 gwenview
> > #6 kontact executing various components: calendar, to-do list, journal
> > #7 kmail links
>
> these are all the same crash, or at least
On Sunday, June 10, 2012 03:23:04 José Manuel Santamaría Lema wrote:
> #1 dolphin:
> #2 gwenview
> #6 kontact executing various components: calendar, to-do list, journal
> #7 kmail links
these are all the same crash, or at least related to each other. it is
crashing in KServiceTypeTrader::defaultO
Hello,
firstly, to be honest, let me say I'm doing huge effort to write this mail in a
way that I don't look like a clueless cretin who reports bugs to the mailing
lists instead of the proper place (bugs.kde.org) just to "cheat" and get "my"
bugs fixed. I promise I'm not that kind of person, I
29 matches
Mail list logo
