[This message is a reply to all people requesting a long-term-maintained
frameworks branch.]
On Sunday 04 May 2014 16:27:44 Luigi Toscano wrote:
> Kevin Ottens ha scritto:
> > So, we had a team discussion here with Albert, Aleix, Alex, Alex,
> > Aurélien, David, Rohan and myself. We juggled with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 04.05.2014 18:36, schrieb David Faure:
> [Cross posting against my will...]
>
> On Sunday 04 May 2014 16:27:44 Luigi Toscano wrote:
>> I understand that the big concern was about the testing: stable
>> branches did not receive the same attention
On Monday, May 05, 2014 11:11:53 Martin Klapetek wrote:
> However this highly depends on the distro policies - if some of the big
> distros say "we will not update KF5 every month because our policies", then
> the 6 months buffer is just moved elsewhere, at the distro level because
> they will upda
On Sunday, May 04, 2014 16:27:44 Luigi Toscano wrote:
> Kevin Ottens ha scritto:
> > So, we had a team discussion here with Albert, Aleix, Alex, Alex,
> > Aurélien,
> > David, Rohan and myself. We juggled with several options, trying to
> > address
> >
> > the following constraints:
> > * We don'
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Martin Klapetek
wrote:
> On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 6:36 PM, David Faure wrote:
>>
>> [Cross posting against my will...]
>>
>> On Sunday 04 May 2014 16:27:44 Luigi Toscano wrote:
>> > I understand that the big concern was about the testing: stable branches
>> > did
>>
0.0.1 version releases seem to work pretty well for Qt and are released
as necessary iiuc.
On 5/5/2014 2:36 AM, David Faure wrote:
[Cross posting against my will...]
On Sunday 04 May 2014 16:27:44 Luigi Toscano wrote:
I understand that the big concern was about the testing: stable branches di
On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 6:36 PM, David Faure wrote:
> [Cross posting against my will...]
>
> On Sunday 04 May 2014 16:27:44 Luigi Toscano wrote:
> > I understand that the big concern was about the testing: stable branches
> did
> > not receive the same attention
>
> This is not the main concern.
>
[Cross posting against my will...]
On Sunday 04 May 2014 16:27:44 Luigi Toscano wrote:
> I understand that the big concern was about the testing: stable branches did
> not receive the same attention
This is not the main concern.
My main concern is that application developers prefer to work aroun
Kevin Ottens ha scritto:
> So, we had a team discussion here with Albert, Aleix, Alex, Alex, Aurélien,
> David, Rohan and myself. We juggled with several options, trying to address
> the following constraints:
> * We don't have many contributors;
> * We don't have enough testing in the stable b
On Sunday 27 April 2014, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> Of course, going with this type of cycle comes with some price of its own:
> * Features in released modules can only be introduced in a very fine
> grained way so as to not jeopardize the stability;
on one hand I'll probably miss feature branches, on
Hello people,
As you may have noticed, we're covering quite a few tasks here during the
sprint. But, we're also having discussion topics, and the most important one
we covered is the release cycle. Indeed, we got the question several times
already of "once 5.0 is out what will happen?" It is wh
11 matches
Mail list logo
