> any feedback on that?
As I already said in previous message:
>> Regarding reviews, I am not against them. I just continue directly
>> committing changes that do not influence on the behavior, such as for
>> example, changes to follow pep8 rules and refactorings.
And, as I already said in chat,
Hi,
On 2024-07-15 21:50, christ...@cullmann.io wrote:
Hi,
On 2024-07-15 20:13, Andrew Shark wrote:
You mean new python dependencies? I never added them. Oppositely, I
reduce them. For example, I gladly got rid of the "promise"
dependency.
yes, with dependencies I meant Python libs and the Py
Hi,
On 2024-07-15 20:13, Andrew Shark wrote:
You mean new python dependencies? I never added them. Oppositely, I
reduce them. For example, I gladly got rid of the "promise"
dependency.
yes, with dependencies I meant Python libs and the Python version.
There was some rather lengthy discussions
On 2024-07-13 15:52, christ...@cullmann.io wrote:
On 2024-07-12 23:01, Thiago Masato Costa Sueto wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to ask about the status of the KDE Review for kde-builder.
The existing issue tracking this has been without activity for a
while: https://invent.kde.org/sdk/kde-builder/-/issue
On 2024-07-12 23:01, Thiago Masato Costa Sueto wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to ask about the status of the KDE Review for kde-builder.
The existing issue tracking this has been without activity for a
while: https://invent.kde.org/sdk/kde-builder/-/issues/84
So far ashark seems to have fulfilled what wa
Hi,
I'd like to ask about the status of the KDE Review for kde-builder.
The existing issue tracking this has been without activity for a while:
https://invent.kde.org/sdk/kde-builder/-/issues/84
So far ashark seems to have fulfilled what was asked of them, and I believe
they're just waiting for
On 09.04.2024 13:51, Sune Vuorela wrote:
On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 10:05 AM wrote:
and deprecating the kdesrc-build. That way we can move forward with new tool.
I don't think reviewing or not of kde-builder should have any effect on
kdesrc-build.
I think also we should be slightly wary of changi
El dimarts, 9 d’abril del 2024, a les 12:51:50 (CEST), Sune Vuorela va
escriure:
> On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 10:05 AM wrote:
> > and deprecating the kdesrc-build. That way we can move forward with new
> > tool.
> I don't think reviewing or not of kde-builder should have any effect on
> kdesrc-build.
On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 10:05 AM wrote:
> and deprecating the kdesrc-build. That way we can move forward with new tool.
I don't think reviewing or not of kde-builder should have any effect on
kdesrc-build.
I think also we should be slightly wary of changing a long-running 20y
old tool written by
On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 11:26 AM Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> ash...@linuxcomp.ru wrote:
> > I've been working on KDE Builder project. This is a reimplementation of
> > kdesrc-build in Python.
>
> What is the point of rewriting a tool originally written in a stable
> language that guarantees long-term b
ash...@linuxcomp.ru wrote:
> I've been working on KDE Builder project. This is a reimplementation of
> kdesrc-build in Python.
What is the point of rewriting a tool originally written in a stable
language that guarantees long-term backwards compatibility (since the
originally planned incompatibl
On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 10:05 AM wrote:
>
> Hi all!
>
> I've been working on KDE Builder project. This is a reimplementation of
> kdesrc-build in Python. At this point, the tool is rather mature, but some
> minor bugs may probably be unnoticed. I'd like to officially request a review
> of KDE Bu
Hi all!
I've been working on KDE Builder project. This is a reimplementation of kdesrc-build in Python. At this point, the tool is rather mature, but some minor bugs may probably be unnoticed. I'd like to officially request a review of KDE Builder for declaring it official tool, and deprecating th
13 matches
Mail list logo
