On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 3:41 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Wednesday, 10 de November de 2010 09:32:48 Dawit A wrote:
>> sigh I got everthing crossed up! Indeed since this is the system bus
>> a sendmsg here is response back to the client. For some reason this
>> response does not seem to make it
On Wednesday, 10 de November de 2010 09:32:48 Dawit A wrote:
> sigh I got everthing crossed up! Indeed since this is the system bus
> a sendmsg here is response back to the client. For some reason this
> response does not seem to make it to the client or at least cause the
> client to react until 2
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 3:14 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Wednesday, 10 de November de 2010 09:04:02 Dawit A wrote:
>> I cannot figure out when the reply was sent back because there is a
>> lot of chatter on the system dbus, but I definitely see the pause
>> after the following message was sent
On Wednesday, 10 de November de 2010 09:04:02 Dawit A wrote:
> I cannot figure out when the reply was sent back because there is a
> lot of chatter on the system dbus, but I definitely see the pause
> after the following message was sent
>
> 1289374216.174405 sendmsg(23, {msg_name(0)=NULL,
> msg_i
Well
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Saturday, 6 de November de 2010 13:58:33 Dawit A wrote:
>> Hmm... if the call times out though, why doesn't it return an error ?
>> I get back the expected reply for the introspection call instead...
>
> Can you check with strace on
On Saturday, 6 de November de 2010 13:58:33 Dawit A wrote:
> Hmm... if the call times out though, why doesn't it return an error ?
> I get back the expected reply for the introspection call instead...
Can you check with strace on the system bus when the reply was actually sent?
strace -ttt -e sen
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 2:15 AM, Dawit A wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 12:35 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
>> On Friday, 5 de November de 2010 18:54:43 Dawit A wrote:
>>> > Can you give me a "thr apply all bt full" of this lockup?
>>>
>>> I guess I would need to recompile both qt and dbus in debug
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 12:35 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Friday, 5 de November de 2010 18:54:43 Dawit A wrote:
>> > Can you give me a "thr apply all bt full" of this lockup?
>>
>> I guess I would need to recompile both qt and dbus in debug mode for
>> this... In the meantime, I have attached w
On Friday, 5 de November de 2010 18:54:43 Dawit A wrote:
> > Can you give me a "thr apply all bt full" of this lockup?
>
> I guess I would need to recompile both qt and dbus in debug mode for
> this... In the meantime, I have attached what you requested with what
> I have now. The freeze occurred
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 9:21 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Friday, 5 de November de 2010 16:25:46 Dawit A wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
>> > On Thursday, 4 de November de 2010 18:15:31 Dawit A wrote:
>> >> QDBusConnectionPrivate(0x1f9b8b0) sending message (bloc
On Friday, 5 de November de 2010 16:25:46 Dawit A wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > On Thursday, 4 de November de 2010 18:15:31 Dawit A wrote:
> >> QDBusConnectionPrivate(0x1f9b8b0) sending message (blocking):
> >> QDBusMessage(type=MethodCall, service="org.freede
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Thursday, 4 de November de 2010 18:15:31 Dawit A wrote:
>> QDBusConnectionPrivate(0x1f9b8b0) sending message (blocking):
>> QDBusMessage(type=MethodCall, service="org.freedesktop.UDisks",
>> path="/org/freedesktop/UDisks",
>> interface="o
On Thursday, 4 de November de 2010 18:15:31 Dawit A wrote:
> QDBusConnectionPrivate(0x1f9b8b0) sending message (blocking):
> QDBusMessage(type=MethodCall, service="org.freedesktop.UDisks",
> path="/org/freedesktop/UDisks",
> interface="org.freedesktop.DBus.Introspectable", member="Introspect",
> si
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> On Thursday 4 November 2010 18:58:09 Dawit A wrote:
>> BTW, I noticed a couple of things in UDisksManager that I want to ask
>> about... The first issue is why does a device that has its
>> "DeviceIsOpticalDisc" property set to true inserted in
On Thursday 4 November 2010 18:58:09 Dawit A wrote:
> BTW, I noticed a couple of things in UDisksManager that I want to ask
> about... The first issue is why does a device that has its
> "DeviceIsOpticalDisc" property set to true inserted into the
> m_deviceCache 2x, once normally and once with ":m
BTW, I noticed a couple of things in UDisksManager that I want to ask
about... The first issue is why does a device that has its
"DeviceIsOpticalDisc" property set to true inserted into the
m_deviceCache 2x, once normally and once with ":media" attached to it
? The second issue is why even bother w
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 3:06 AM, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> On Thursday 4 November 2010 02:00:40 Dawit A wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Lukáš Tinkl wrote:
>> > Thanks, I'll look into it tomorrow... things can definitely get faster :)
>>
>> To that end I have consolidated all my local changes
On Thursday 4 November 2010 02:00:40 Dawit A wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Lukáš Tinkl wrote:
> > Thanks, I'll look into it tomorrow... things can definitely get faster :)
>
> To that end I have consolidated all my local changes into a single
> patch and updated bug # 253039 with it. F
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Lukáš Tinkl wrote:
> Dne Út 2. listopadu 2010 21:09:10 Dawit A napsal(a):
>> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Lukáš Tinkl wrote:
>> > Dne Po 1. listopadu 2010 18:25:33 Dawit A napsal(a):
>> >> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Lukáš Tinkl wrote:
>> >> > Dne Ne 31. ř
Dne Út 2. listopadu 2010 21:09:10 Dawit A napsal(a):
> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Lukáš Tinkl wrote:
> > Dne Po 1. listopadu 2010 18:25:33 Dawit A napsal(a):
> >> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Lukáš Tinkl wrote:
> >> > Dne Ne 31. října 2010 03:32:52 Dawit A napsal(a):
> >> >> On Wed, Oct
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 2:41 PM, Lukáš Tinkl wrote:
> Dne Po 1. listopadu 2010 19:24:55 Alexis Ménard napsal(a):
>> It's a supposed threading issue in dbus that has been fixed in the
>> latest version 1.4.0
>>
>> I'm running Archlinux and I got the upgrades some weeks ago. The
>> problem disappeare
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Lukáš Tinkl wrote:
> Dne Po 1. listopadu 2010 18:25:33 Dawit A napsal(a):
>> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Lukáš Tinkl wrote:
>> > Dne Ne 31. října 2010 03:32:52 Dawit A napsal(a):
>> >> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Dawit A wrote:
>> >> > On Wed, Oct 27, 2
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Alexis Ménard wrote:
> It's a supposed threading issue in dbus that has been fixed in the
> latest version 1.4.0
I am using the latest dbus:.
dbus 1.4.0-1
dbus-core 1.4.0-1
> I'm running Archlinux and I got the upgrades some weeks ago. The
> problem disappeared
Dne Po 1. listopadu 2010 19:24:55 Alexis Ménard napsal(a):
> It's a supposed threading issue in dbus that has been fixed in the
> latest version 1.4.0
>
> I'm running Archlinux and I got the upgrades some weeks ago. The
> problem disappeared since then...
Yup, that's why I'm not getting those iss
Dne Po 1. listopadu 2010 18:25:33 Dawit A napsal(a):
> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Lukáš Tinkl wrote:
> > Dne Ne 31. října 2010 03:32:52 Dawit A napsal(a):
> >> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Dawit A wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 7:48 AM, Lukáš Tinkl wrote:
> >> >> Dne St 27. říj
It's a supposed threading issue in dbus that has been fixed in the
latest version 1.4.0
I'm running Archlinux and I got the upgrades some weeks ago. The
problem disappeared since then...
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Dawit A wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Lukáš Tinkl wrote:
>> Dne
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Lukáš Tinkl wrote:
> Dne Ne 31. října 2010 03:32:52 Dawit A napsal(a):
>> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Dawit A wrote:
>> > On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 7:48 AM, Lukáš Tinkl wrote:
>> >> Dne St 27. října 2010 00:57:27 Christophe Giboudeaux napsal(a):
>> >>> Hi,
>>
Dne Ne 31. října 2010 03:32:52 Dawit A napsal(a):
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Dawit A wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 7:48 AM, Lukáš Tinkl wrote:
> >> Dne St 27. října 2010 00:57:27 Christophe Giboudeaux napsal(a):
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Le 27/10/2010 00:20, Dawit A a écrit :
> >>> > D
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 3:32 AM, Dawit A wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Dawit A wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 7:48 AM, Lukáš Tinkl wrote:
> >> Dne St 27. října 2010 00:57:27 Christophe Giboudeaux napsal(a):
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Le 27/10/2010 00:20, Dawit A a écrit :
> >>> > Do
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Dawit A wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 7:48 AM, Lukáš Tinkl wrote:
>> Dne St 27. října 2010 00:57:27 Christophe Giboudeaux napsal(a):
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Le 27/10/2010 00:20, Dawit A a écrit :
>>> > Does anyone have a problem opening project files (CTRL+O) in qtcre
30 matches
Mail list logo
