Re: Finalized proposal for changes to i18n in KF5

2013-01-09 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 03:05:25PM +0100, Chusslove Illich wrote: > >> [: Chusslove Illich :] > >> I'm not opposed to some additional bureaucracy in order to make the > >> framework more accessible to potential users. [...] > > > > [: Oswald Buddenhagen :] > > [...] i'd hate it to see my thoroughly

Re: Finalized proposal for changes to i18n in KF5

2013-01-08 Thread Chusslove Illich
>> [: Chusslove Illich :] >> I'm not opposed to some additional bureaucracy in order to make the >> framework more accessible to potential users. [...] > > [: Oswald Buddenhagen :] > [...] i'd hate it to see my thoroughly engineered code being displaced by > a (possibly even slightly inferior) comp

Re: Finalized proposal for changes to i18n in KF5

2013-01-07 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 06:38:58PM +0100, Chusslove Illich wrote: > > [: Oswald Buddenhagen :] > > of course, it would be even better if you strived for submission to qt- > > project, if at all realistic (for now probably an add-on, but definitely > > under cla). otherwise you'll see the same effec

Re: Finalized proposal for changes to i18n in KF5

2013-01-05 Thread Chusslove Illich
> [: Oswald Buddenhagen :] > of course, it would be even better if you strived for submission to qt- > project, if at all realistic (for now probably an add-on, but definitely > under cla). otherwise you'll see the same effect every other useful lgpl'd > qt framework sees sonner or later: it gets r

Re: Finalized proposal for changes to i18n in KF5

2013-01-05 Thread Kevin Krammer
On Friday, 2013-01-04, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > random ramblings: > > i don't like the recommendation for extracted vs. disambiguating > comments (and closed-source authors will typically do the exact opposite > anyway). The opposite thing as in only having comments and not caring at all abou

Re: Finalized proposal for changes to i18n in KF5

2013-01-04 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 10:44:22AM +0100, Chusslove Illich wrote: > I have written up the headers and Doxygen pages for the Ki18n framework as > it should finally look like, available here: > excellent work. though i was too lazy to make a real api review. ^^ of course, it would be even better if

Re: Finalized proposal for changes to i18n in KF5

2012-12-27 Thread Dominik Haumann
On Saturday, December 22, 2012 10:44:22 AM Chusslove Illich wrote: > I have written up the headers and Doxygen pages for the Ki18n framework as > it should finally look like, available here: > > http://nedohodnik.net/misc/ki18n-kf5-01/html/index.html > http://nedohodnik.net/misc/ki18n-kf5-01/k

Re: Finalized proposal for changes to i18n in KF5

2012-12-27 Thread Chusslove Illich
> Nice writeup, very complete! On IRC Albert noted that I didn't quite cover tr2i18n use for .ui files, which also holds for .kcfg and .rc. For these I should document how to set the catalog and markup-awareness. For .ui this can be non-invasive (optional arguments to CMake *_ADD_UI_FILES macro) b

Re: Finalized proposal for changes to i18n in KF5

2012-12-26 Thread David Faure
On Saturday 22 December 2012 10:44:22 Chusslove Illich wrote: > I have written up the headers and Doxygen pages for the Ki18n framework as > it should finally look like, available here: > > http://nedohodnik.net/misc/ki18n-kf5-01/html/index.html > http://nedohodnik.net/misc/ki18n-kf5-01/klocal

Re: Finalized proposal for changes to i18n in KF5

2012-12-24 Thread Chusslove Illich
> [: Allen Winter :] > Plus, you documentation is really nice and easy to follow. Thank you. Given the general motivation behind Frameworks, my main intention was for documentation to be reasonably self-contained: without assuming that additional articles on Techbase must be read, that the code wi

Re: Finalized proposal for changes to i18n in KF5

2012-12-24 Thread Allen Winter
On Saturday 22 December 2012 10:44:22 AM Chusslove Illich wrote: > I have written up the headers and Doxygen pages for the Ki18n framework as > it should finally look like, available here: > > http://nedohodnik.net/misc/ki18n-kf5-01/html/index.html > http://nedohodnik.net/misc/ki18n-kf5-01/klo

Finalized proposal for changes to i18n in KF5

2012-12-22 Thread Chusslove Illich
I have written up the headers and Doxygen pages for the Ki18n framework as it should finally look like, available here: http://nedohodnik.net/misc/ki18n-kf5-01/html/index.html http://nedohodnik.net/misc/ki18n-kf5-01/klocalizedstring.h http://nedohodnik.net/misc/ki18n-kf5-01/kuitmarkup.h As