s a spdx license header, resulting in much
> > > tidier file headers.
> > >
> > > I entirely fail to understand why we need to slap a FileCopyrightText
> > > on files. The copyright surely applies whether or not I put the
> > > FileCopyrightText there. The
> I entirely fail to understand why we need to slap a FileCopyrightText
> > on files. The copyright surely applies whether or not I put the
> > FileCopyrightText there. The list is also just about always
> > incomplete, further calling its use into question. Not to mention that
&g
On Monday, January 29, 2024 10:43:04 AM CET Harald Sitter wrote:
> do we really need it?
>
> systemd for example only has a spdx license header, resulting in much
> tidier file headers.
>
> I entirely fail to understand why we need to slap a FileCopyrightText
> on files.
On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 9:43 AM Harald Sitter wrote:
>
> do we really need it?
>
> systemd for example only has a spdx license header, resulting in much
> tidier file headers.
>
> I entirely fail to understand why we need to slap a FileCopyrightText
> on files. The
do we really need it?
systemd for example only has a spdx license header, resulting in much
tidier file headers.
I entirely fail to understand why we need to slap a FileCopyrightText
on files. The copyright surely applies whether or not I put the
FileCopyrightText there. The list is also just
