Re: Feature matrix for future infrastructure

2015-01-30 Thread Milian Wolff
On Thursday 29 January 2015 22:02:15 Thomas Lübking wrote: > On Donnerstag, 29. Januar 2015 12:54:25 CET, Jan Kundrát wrote: > > On Thursday, 29 January 2015 12:49:17 CEST, Christoph Feck wrote: > >> If it even allows to edit a change request from a different > >> person online, then I *want that*.

Re: Feature matrix for future infrastructure

2015-01-29 Thread Thomas Lübking
On Donnerstag, 29. Januar 2015 12:54:25 CET, Jan Kundrát wrote: On Thursday, 29 January 2015 12:49:17 CEST, Christoph Feck wrote: If it even allows to edit a change request from a different person online, then I *want that*. I find it much more time consuming and demotivating to nitpick small s

Re: Feature matrix for future infrastructure

2015-01-29 Thread Jan Kundrát
On Thursday, 29 January 2015 12:49:17 CEST, Christoph Feck wrote: If it even allows to edit a change request from a different person online, then I *want that*. I find it much more time consuming and demotivating to nitpick small style/whitespace changes, than to simply edit them out. Yes, it

Re: Feature matrix for future infrastructure

2015-01-29 Thread Christoph Feck
On Thursday 29 January 2015 00:10:02 Jan Kundrát wrote: > It will be even easier -- the upcoming Gerrit 2.11 contains an > online editor, so the workflow will be "open file, edit it, push a > button for making a change request". If it even allows to edit a change request from a different person o

Re: Feature matrix for future infrastructure

2015-01-28 Thread Jan Kundrát
On Monday, 26 January 2015 18:11:34 CEST, Thomas Lübking wrote: Eg. I can very well see that somebody concerned w/ i18n would like to lookup code via cgit (or similar - no flames here, please ;-), download a single file, fix a so far untranslated string, "diff -pru" it with the original and sim

Re: Feature matrix for future infrastructure

2015-01-26 Thread Thomas Lübking
On Montag, 26. Januar 2015 01:38:54 CET, Kevin Kofler wrote: Thomas Lübking wrote: If you had followed the discussion or at least looked at that feature matrix Milian started and that you liked to high-handedly deem as rubbish, you'd have noticed that webfrontends to upload patches (like suggest

Re: Feature matrix for future infrastructure

2015-01-26 Thread Kevin Kofler
Thomas Lübking wrote: > If you had followed the discussion or at least looked at that feature > matrix Milian started and that you liked to high-handedly deem as rubbish, > you'd have noticed that webfrontends to upload patches (like suggested > https://tools.wmflabs.org/gerrit-patch-uploader/) are

Re: Feature matrix for future infrastructure

2015-01-24 Thread Thomas Lübking
Sorry, not fast enough away from the Ctrl key. On Freitag, 23. Januar 2015 15:21:34 CEST, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: Gerrit is just a kind of reviewboard with a git integration, phabricator is a whole integrated development platform. And, apart from detail-by-detail comparisons, gerrit would

Re: Feature matrix for future infrastructure

2015-01-24 Thread Jan Kundrát
On Friday, 23 January 2015 15:21:34 CEST, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: There is no way an artist who has a nice patch for Krita is ever going to be able to inducted into becoming a Krita developer if they have to follow instructions like this: https://techbase.kde.org/Development/Gerrit Hi Boudewi

Re: Feature matrix for future infrastructure

2015-01-24 Thread Thomas Lübking
On Freitag, 23. Januar 2015 15:21:34 CEST, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: Gerrit is just a kind of reviewboard with a git integration, phabricator is a whole integrated development platform. And, apart from detail-by-detail comparisons, gerrit would be an exceedingly bad choice for a community like

Re: Feature matrix for future infrastructure

2015-01-24 Thread Milian Wolff
On Friday 23 January 2015 15:21:34 Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > On Thu, 22 Jan 2015, Milian Wolff wrote: > > Hey all, > > > > I started this page just now: > > > > https://community.kde.org/Sysadmin/FutureInfrastructure > > > > It's pretty limited, so far. I hope everyone could help out and extend i

Re: Feature matrix for future infrastructure

2015-01-23 Thread Boudewijn Rempt
On Thu, 22 Jan 2015, Milian Wolff wrote: Hey all, I started this page just now: https://community.kde.org/Sysadmin/FutureInfrastructure It's pretty limited, so far. I hope everyone could help out and extend it and fill it with the information and verify that each contestant is displayed in a

Re: Feature matrix for future infrastructure

2015-01-23 Thread Boudewijn Rempt
Hm... That matrix needs a heck of a lot of work before it's worth its while. It basically perpetuates the illusion that phabricator and gerrit are the same thing, which isn't correct. Gerrit is basically a reviewboard with a git integration, phabricator is a whole integrated development platfo

Re: Feature matrix for future infrastructure

2015-01-23 Thread Martin Klapetek
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Milian Wolff wrote: > Hey all, > > I started this page just now: > > https://community.kde.org/Sysadmin/FutureInfrastructure > > It's pretty limited, so far. I hope everyone could help out and extend it > and > fill it with the information and verify that each con

Feature matrix for future infrastructure

2015-01-23 Thread Milian Wolff
Hey all, I started this page just now: https://community.kde.org/Sysadmin/FutureInfrastructure It's pretty limited, so far. I hope everyone could help out and extend it and fill it with the information and verify that each contestant is displayed in a fair light. Please add links, comments etc