On Sunday 01 December 2013 14:18:35 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On domingo, 1 de dezembro de 2013 13:42:15, Rex Dieter wrote:
> > Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
> > > On Thursday 28 November 2013, Michael Palimaka wrote:
> > >> Any thoughts?
> > >
> > > In an ideal world we would convince the distros t
On domingo, 1 de dezembro de 2013 13:42:15, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
> > On Thursday 28 November 2013, Michael Palimaka wrote:
> >> Any thoughts?
> >
> > In an ideal world we would convince the distros to enable Qt namespace on
> > Qt5, so that Qt4 and Qt5 symbols does not
Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
>
> On Thursday 28 November 2013, Michael Palimaka wrote:
>>
>> Any thoughts?
>>
> In an ideal world we would convince the distros to enable Qt namespace on
> Qt5, so that Qt4 and Qt5 symbols does not clash, and does not cause
> crashes when loaded as plugins etc.
On Thursday 28 November 2013, Michael Palimaka wrote:
>
> Any thoughts?
>
In an ideal world we would convince the distros to enable Qt namespace on Qt5,
so that Qt4 and Qt5 symbols does not clash, and does not cause crashes when
loaded as plugins etc.
`Allan
Hi,
Is there an established best practice for libraries to support both Qt4
and Qt5?
Currently, some libraries such as phonon rename their Qt5 versions,
permitting full parallel installation and usage (even of development and
CMake config files).
Other libraries such as attica bump the maj
