Re: [kde-frameworks-devel] Review request: QBluez

2015-03-12 Thread David Rosca
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 6:49 PM, Jonathan Riddell wrote: > The name KF5BluezQt seems inelegant, is has both a prefix and a suffix, how > about just KF5Bluez? That would work, but only for cmake files, otherwise I would have to change namespace from BluezQt to just Bluez, which is obviously not

Re: [kde-frameworks-devel] Review request: QBluez

2015-03-11 Thread Jonathan Riddell
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 10:40:44AM +0100, David Rosca wrote: > Hi all, > I'd like to ask for a review of the QBluez library [1]. Looks like you've been working hard :) The name KF5BluezQt seems inelegant, is has both a prefix and a suffix, how about just KF5Bluez ? The headers get installed int